Cargando…
Assessment of two prophylactic fluid strategies in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized trial
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of two prophylactic euvolemic fluid strategy regimens on the incidence of cerebral vasospasm and clinical outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: Ninety-six patients with a basal intravenous intake of 15 mL/kg/day of Ringer’s lact...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32689849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520927526 |
_version_ | 1783561929762013184 |
---|---|
author | Gál, Judit Fülesdi, Béla Varga, Dávid Fodor, Babett Varga, Eszter Siró, Péter Bereczki, Dániel Szabó, Sándor Molnár, Csilla |
author_facet | Gál, Judit Fülesdi, Béla Varga, Dávid Fodor, Babett Varga, Eszter Siró, Péter Bereczki, Dániel Szabó, Sándor Molnár, Csilla |
author_sort | Gál, Judit |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of two prophylactic euvolemic fluid strategy regimens on the incidence of cerebral vasospasm and clinical outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: Ninety-six patients with a basal intravenous intake of 15 mL/kg/day of Ringer’s lactate solution were included, and an additional 15 to 50 mL/kg/day Ringer’s lactate (RL-group) or hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 solution (HES-group) was administered to maintain the targeted mean arterial pressure. The primary end point was the occurrence of cerebral vasospasm during the first 14 days. The secondary end points were case fatality, Barthel’s index, and Glasgow Outcome Scores (GOS) at 30 days after SAH. RESULTS: Cerebral vasospasm developed in 42 patients (43.7%), and nine of these events were severe. The vasospasm rate among the RL- and HES-based groups was 25/48 and 17/48, respectively. For the secondary endpoint, four patients (4%) died by the end of follow-up (two in each group). Unfavorable outcome cases were not different in the RL and HES groups (9 vs. 14, respectively). There was no difference between the Barthel’s scores at 30 days between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Using starches in a prophylactic treatment strategy in aneurysmal SAH in not supported by the study. The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT02064075 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7375726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73757262020-07-31 Assessment of two prophylactic fluid strategies in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized trial Gál, Judit Fülesdi, Béla Varga, Dávid Fodor, Babett Varga, Eszter Siró, Péter Bereczki, Dániel Szabó, Sándor Molnár, Csilla J Int Med Res Prospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of two prophylactic euvolemic fluid strategy regimens on the incidence of cerebral vasospasm and clinical outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: Ninety-six patients with a basal intravenous intake of 15 mL/kg/day of Ringer’s lactate solution were included, and an additional 15 to 50 mL/kg/day Ringer’s lactate (RL-group) or hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 solution (HES-group) was administered to maintain the targeted mean arterial pressure. The primary end point was the occurrence of cerebral vasospasm during the first 14 days. The secondary end points were case fatality, Barthel’s index, and Glasgow Outcome Scores (GOS) at 30 days after SAH. RESULTS: Cerebral vasospasm developed in 42 patients (43.7%), and nine of these events were severe. The vasospasm rate among the RL- and HES-based groups was 25/48 and 17/48, respectively. For the secondary endpoint, four patients (4%) died by the end of follow-up (two in each group). Unfavorable outcome cases were not different in the RL and HES groups (9 vs. 14, respectively). There was no difference between the Barthel’s scores at 30 days between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Using starches in a prophylactic treatment strategy in aneurysmal SAH in not supported by the study. The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT02064075 SAGE Publications 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7375726/ /pubmed/32689849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520927526 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Prospective Clinical Research Report Gál, Judit Fülesdi, Béla Varga, Dávid Fodor, Babett Varga, Eszter Siró, Péter Bereczki, Dániel Szabó, Sándor Molnár, Csilla Assessment of two prophylactic fluid strategies in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized trial |
title | Assessment of two prophylactic fluid strategies in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized trial |
title_full | Assessment of two prophylactic fluid strategies in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Assessment of two prophylactic fluid strategies in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of two prophylactic fluid strategies in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized trial |
title_short | Assessment of two prophylactic fluid strategies in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized trial |
title_sort | assessment of two prophylactic fluid strategies in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized trial |
topic | Prospective Clinical Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32689849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520927526 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galjudit assessmentoftwoprophylacticfluidstrategiesinaneurysmalsubarachnoidhemorrhagearandomizedtrial AT fulesdibela assessmentoftwoprophylacticfluidstrategiesinaneurysmalsubarachnoidhemorrhagearandomizedtrial AT vargadavid assessmentoftwoprophylacticfluidstrategiesinaneurysmalsubarachnoidhemorrhagearandomizedtrial AT fodorbabett assessmentoftwoprophylacticfluidstrategiesinaneurysmalsubarachnoidhemorrhagearandomizedtrial AT vargaeszter assessmentoftwoprophylacticfluidstrategiesinaneurysmalsubarachnoidhemorrhagearandomizedtrial AT siropeter assessmentoftwoprophylacticfluidstrategiesinaneurysmalsubarachnoidhemorrhagearandomizedtrial AT bereczkidaniel assessmentoftwoprophylacticfluidstrategiesinaneurysmalsubarachnoidhemorrhagearandomizedtrial AT szabosandor assessmentoftwoprophylacticfluidstrategiesinaneurysmalsubarachnoidhemorrhagearandomizedtrial AT molnarcsilla assessmentoftwoprophylacticfluidstrategiesinaneurysmalsubarachnoidhemorrhagearandomizedtrial |