Cargando…

Validation of a fast prognostic score for risk stratification of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrate an improved prognostic performance of the 2014 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) algorithm for risk stratification of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) compared to the 2008 ESC algorithm. The modified FAST and Bova scores appear especially helpful to ide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hobohm, Lukas, Becattini, Cecilia, Konstantinides, Stavros V., Casazza, Franco, Lankeit, Mareike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7376081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01593-w
_version_ 1783561974072737792
author Hobohm, Lukas
Becattini, Cecilia
Konstantinides, Stavros V.
Casazza, Franco
Lankeit, Mareike
author_facet Hobohm, Lukas
Becattini, Cecilia
Konstantinides, Stavros V.
Casazza, Franco
Lankeit, Mareike
author_sort Hobohm, Lukas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrate an improved prognostic performance of the 2014 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) algorithm for risk stratification of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) compared to the 2008 ESC algorithm. The modified FAST and Bova scores appear especially helpful to identify PE patients at intermediate-high risk. METHODS: We validated the prognostic performance of the modified FAST score compared to other scores for risk stratification in a post-hoc analysis of 868 normotensive PE patients included in the prospective Italian Pulmonary Embolism Registry. In-hospital adverse outcome was defined as PE-related death, mechanical ventilation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation or administration of catecholamines. RESULTS: Overall, 27 patients (3.1%) had an adverse outcome and 32 patients (3.7%) died. The rate of an adverse outcome was highest in the intermediate-high risk classes of the 2019 ESC algorithm (7.5%) and the modified FAST score (5.3%) while the Bova score failed to discriminate between intermediate-low and intermediate-high-risk patients. Patients classified as intermediate-high risk by the 2019 ESC algorithm (Odds Ratio [OR], 4.2 [95% CI, 1.9–9.0]) and modified FAST score (OR, 2.8 [1.3–6.2]) had a higher risk of an adverse outcome compared to patients classified by the Bova score (OR, 1.6 [0.7–3.7]). The c-index was higher for the 2019 ESC algorithm and the modified FAST score (AUC, 0.69 [0.58–0.79] and 0.67 [0.59–0.76]) compared to the Bova score (AUC, 0.64 [0.55–0.73]). CONCLUSIONS: The 2019 ESC algorithm provided the best prognostic performance, but also the modified FAST score accurately stratified normotensive PE patients in different risk classes while the Bova score failed to identify patients at highest risk. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00392-019-01593-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7376081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73760812020-07-27 Validation of a fast prognostic score for risk stratification of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism Hobohm, Lukas Becattini, Cecilia Konstantinides, Stavros V. Casazza, Franco Lankeit, Mareike Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrate an improved prognostic performance of the 2014 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) algorithm for risk stratification of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) compared to the 2008 ESC algorithm. The modified FAST and Bova scores appear especially helpful to identify PE patients at intermediate-high risk. METHODS: We validated the prognostic performance of the modified FAST score compared to other scores for risk stratification in a post-hoc analysis of 868 normotensive PE patients included in the prospective Italian Pulmonary Embolism Registry. In-hospital adverse outcome was defined as PE-related death, mechanical ventilation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation or administration of catecholamines. RESULTS: Overall, 27 patients (3.1%) had an adverse outcome and 32 patients (3.7%) died. The rate of an adverse outcome was highest in the intermediate-high risk classes of the 2019 ESC algorithm (7.5%) and the modified FAST score (5.3%) while the Bova score failed to discriminate between intermediate-low and intermediate-high-risk patients. Patients classified as intermediate-high risk by the 2019 ESC algorithm (Odds Ratio [OR], 4.2 [95% CI, 1.9–9.0]) and modified FAST score (OR, 2.8 [1.3–6.2]) had a higher risk of an adverse outcome compared to patients classified by the Bova score (OR, 1.6 [0.7–3.7]). The c-index was higher for the 2019 ESC algorithm and the modified FAST score (AUC, 0.69 [0.58–0.79] and 0.67 [0.59–0.76]) compared to the Bova score (AUC, 0.64 [0.55–0.73]). CONCLUSIONS: The 2019 ESC algorithm provided the best prognostic performance, but also the modified FAST score accurately stratified normotensive PE patients in different risk classes while the Bova score failed to identify patients at highest risk. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00392-019-01593-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-06 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7376081/ /pubmed/32025793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01593-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hobohm, Lukas
Becattini, Cecilia
Konstantinides, Stavros V.
Casazza, Franco
Lankeit, Mareike
Validation of a fast prognostic score for risk stratification of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism
title Validation of a fast prognostic score for risk stratification of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism
title_full Validation of a fast prognostic score for risk stratification of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism
title_fullStr Validation of a fast prognostic score for risk stratification of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a fast prognostic score for risk stratification of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism
title_short Validation of a fast prognostic score for risk stratification of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism
title_sort validation of a fast prognostic score for risk stratification of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7376081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01593-w
work_keys_str_mv AT hobohmlukas validationofafastprognosticscoreforriskstratificationofnormotensivepatientswithacutepulmonaryembolism
AT becattinicecilia validationofafastprognosticscoreforriskstratificationofnormotensivepatientswithacutepulmonaryembolism
AT konstantinidesstavrosv validationofafastprognosticscoreforriskstratificationofnormotensivepatientswithacutepulmonaryembolism
AT casazzafranco validationofafastprognosticscoreforriskstratificationofnormotensivepatientswithacutepulmonaryembolism
AT lankeitmareike validationofafastprognosticscoreforriskstratificationofnormotensivepatientswithacutepulmonaryembolism