Cargando…
Decellularised scaffolds: just a framework? Current knowledge and future directions
The use of decellularised matrices as scaffolds offers the advantage of great similarity with the tissue to be replaced. Moreover, decellularised tissues and organs can be repopulated with the patient’s own cells to produce bespoke therapies. Great progress has been made in research and development...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7376382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32742632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041731420942903 |
_version_ | 1783562033253318656 |
---|---|
author | García-Gareta, Elena Abduldaiem, Yousef Sawadkar, Prasad Kyriakidis, Christos Lali, Ferdinand Greco, Karin Vicente |
author_facet | García-Gareta, Elena Abduldaiem, Yousef Sawadkar, Prasad Kyriakidis, Christos Lali, Ferdinand Greco, Karin Vicente |
author_sort | García-Gareta, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of decellularised matrices as scaffolds offers the advantage of great similarity with the tissue to be replaced. Moreover, decellularised tissues and organs can be repopulated with the patient’s own cells to produce bespoke therapies. Great progress has been made in research and development of decellularised scaffolds, and more recently, these materials are being used in exciting new areas like hydrogels and bioinks. However, much effort is still needed towards preserving the original extracellular matrix composition, especially its minor components, assessing its functionality and scaling up for large tissues and organs. Emphasis should also be placed on developing new decellularisation methods and establishing minimal criteria for assessing the success of the decellularisation process. The aim of this review is to critically review the existing literature on decellularised scaffolds, especially on the preparation of these matrices, and point out areas for improvement, finishing with alternative uses of decellularised scaffolds other than tissue and organ reconstruction. Such uses include three-dimensional ex vivo platforms for idiopathic diseases and cancer modelling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7376382 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73763822020-07-31 Decellularised scaffolds: just a framework? Current knowledge and future directions García-Gareta, Elena Abduldaiem, Yousef Sawadkar, Prasad Kyriakidis, Christos Lali, Ferdinand Greco, Karin Vicente J Tissue Eng Review The use of decellularised matrices as scaffolds offers the advantage of great similarity with the tissue to be replaced. Moreover, decellularised tissues and organs can be repopulated with the patient’s own cells to produce bespoke therapies. Great progress has been made in research and development of decellularised scaffolds, and more recently, these materials are being used in exciting new areas like hydrogels and bioinks. However, much effort is still needed towards preserving the original extracellular matrix composition, especially its minor components, assessing its functionality and scaling up for large tissues and organs. Emphasis should also be placed on developing new decellularisation methods and establishing minimal criteria for assessing the success of the decellularisation process. The aim of this review is to critically review the existing literature on decellularised scaffolds, especially on the preparation of these matrices, and point out areas for improvement, finishing with alternative uses of decellularised scaffolds other than tissue and organ reconstruction. Such uses include three-dimensional ex vivo platforms for idiopathic diseases and cancer modelling. SAGE Publications 2020-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7376382/ /pubmed/32742632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041731420942903 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review García-Gareta, Elena Abduldaiem, Yousef Sawadkar, Prasad Kyriakidis, Christos Lali, Ferdinand Greco, Karin Vicente Decellularised scaffolds: just a framework? Current knowledge and future directions |
title | Decellularised scaffolds: just a framework? Current knowledge and
future directions |
title_full | Decellularised scaffolds: just a framework? Current knowledge and
future directions |
title_fullStr | Decellularised scaffolds: just a framework? Current knowledge and
future directions |
title_full_unstemmed | Decellularised scaffolds: just a framework? Current knowledge and
future directions |
title_short | Decellularised scaffolds: just a framework? Current knowledge and
future directions |
title_sort | decellularised scaffolds: just a framework? current knowledge and
future directions |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7376382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32742632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041731420942903 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciagaretaelena decellularisedscaffoldsjustaframeworkcurrentknowledgeandfuturedirections AT abduldaiemyousef decellularisedscaffoldsjustaframeworkcurrentknowledgeandfuturedirections AT sawadkarprasad decellularisedscaffoldsjustaframeworkcurrentknowledgeandfuturedirections AT kyriakidischristos decellularisedscaffoldsjustaframeworkcurrentknowledgeandfuturedirections AT laliferdinand decellularisedscaffoldsjustaframeworkcurrentknowledgeandfuturedirections AT grecokarinvicente decellularisedscaffoldsjustaframeworkcurrentknowledgeandfuturedirections |