Cargando…
Assessment of Preprint Policies of Top-Ranked Clinical Journals
This cross-sectional study examines the preprint publication policies of 100 clinical journals with the highest impact factor.
Autores principales: | Massey, Dorothy S., Opare, Michelle A., Wallach, Joshua D., Ross, Joseph S., Krumholz, Harlan M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7376388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32697320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11127 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Assessment of Concordance and Discordance Among Clinical Studies Posted as Preprints and Subsequently Published in High-Impact Journals
por: Shi, Xiaoting, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparison of Clinical Study Results Reported in medRxiv Preprints vs Peer-reviewed Journal Articles
por: Janda, Guneet, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals
por: Klebel, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Journal clubs in the time of preprints
por: Avasthi, Prachee, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Need for universal acceptance of preprinting by editors of journals of health professional education
por: Schvaneveldt, Nena
Publicado: (2022)