Cargando…

Identification of Neuropsychiatric Copy Number Variants in a Health Care System Population

IMPORTANCE: Population screening for medically relevant genomic variants that cause diseases such as hereditary cancer and cardiovascular disorders is increasing to facilitate early disease detection or prevention. Neuropsychiatric disorders (NPDs) are common, complex disorders with clear genetic ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Christa Lese, Wain, Karen E., Oetjens, Matthew T., Tolwinski, Kasia, Palen, Emily, Hare-Harris, Abby, Habegger, Lukas, Maxwell, Evan K., Reid, Jeffrey G., Walsh, Lauren Kasparson, Myers, Scott M., Ledbetter, David H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7376464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32697297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2159
_version_ 1783562049921482752
author Martin, Christa Lese
Wain, Karen E.
Oetjens, Matthew T.
Tolwinski, Kasia
Palen, Emily
Hare-Harris, Abby
Habegger, Lukas
Maxwell, Evan K.
Reid, Jeffrey G.
Walsh, Lauren Kasparson
Myers, Scott M.
Ledbetter, David H.
author_facet Martin, Christa Lese
Wain, Karen E.
Oetjens, Matthew T.
Tolwinski, Kasia
Palen, Emily
Hare-Harris, Abby
Habegger, Lukas
Maxwell, Evan K.
Reid, Jeffrey G.
Walsh, Lauren Kasparson
Myers, Scott M.
Ledbetter, David H.
author_sort Martin, Christa Lese
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Population screening for medically relevant genomic variants that cause diseases such as hereditary cancer and cardiovascular disorders is increasing to facilitate early disease detection or prevention. Neuropsychiatric disorders (NPDs) are common, complex disorders with clear genetic causes; yet, access to genetic diagnosis is limited. We explored whether inclusion of NPD in population-based genomic screening programs is warranted by assessing 3 key factors: prevalence, penetrance, and personal utility. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the suitability of including pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) associated with NPD in population screening by determining their prevalence and penetrance and exploring the personal utility of disclosing results. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cohort study, the frequency of 31 NPD CNVs was determined in patient-participants via exome data. Associated clinical phenotypes were assessed using linked electronic health records. Nine CNVs were selected for disclosure by licensed genetic counselors, and participants’ psychosocial reactions were evaluated using a mixed-methods approach. A primarily adult population receiving medical care at Geisinger, a large integrated health care system in the United States with the only population-based genomic screening program approved for medically relevant results disclosure, was included. The cohort was identified from the Geisinger MyCode Community Health Initiative. Exome and linked electronic health record data were available for this cohort, which was recruited from February 2007 to April 2017. Data were collected for the qualitative analysis April 2017 through February 2018. Analysis began February 2018 and ended December 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The planned outcomes of this study include (1) prevalence estimate of NPD-associated CNVs in an unselected health care system population; (2) penetrance estimate of NPD diagnoses in CNV-positive individuals; and (3) qualitative themes that describe participants’ responses to receiving NPD-associated genomic results. RESULTS: Of 90 595 participants with CNV data, a pathogenic CNV was identified in 708 (0.8%; 436 women [61.6%]; mean [SD] age, 50.04 [18.74] years). Seventy percent (n = 494) had at least 1 associated clinical symptom. Of these, 28.8% (204) of CNV-positive individuals had an NPD code in their electronic health record, compared with 13.3% (11 835 of 89 887) of CNV-negative individuals (odds ratio, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.86-2.61; P < .001); 66.4% (470) of CNV-positive individuals had a history of depression and anxiety compared with 54.6% (49 118 of 89 887) of CNV-negative individuals (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.31-1.80; P < .001). 16p13.11 (71 [0.078%]) and 22q11.2 (108 [0.119%]) were the most prevalent deletions and duplications, respectively. Only 5.8% of individuals (41 of 708) had a previously known genetic diagnosis. Results disclosure was completed for 141 individuals. Positive participant responses included poignant reactions to learning a medical reason for lifelong cognitive and psychiatric disabilities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study informs critical factors central to the development of population-based genomic screening programs and supports the inclusion of NPD in future designs to promote equitable access to clinically useful genomic information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7376464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73764642020-08-10 Identification of Neuropsychiatric Copy Number Variants in a Health Care System Population Martin, Christa Lese Wain, Karen E. Oetjens, Matthew T. Tolwinski, Kasia Palen, Emily Hare-Harris, Abby Habegger, Lukas Maxwell, Evan K. Reid, Jeffrey G. Walsh, Lauren Kasparson Myers, Scott M. Ledbetter, David H. JAMA Psychiatry Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Population screening for medically relevant genomic variants that cause diseases such as hereditary cancer and cardiovascular disorders is increasing to facilitate early disease detection or prevention. Neuropsychiatric disorders (NPDs) are common, complex disorders with clear genetic causes; yet, access to genetic diagnosis is limited. We explored whether inclusion of NPD in population-based genomic screening programs is warranted by assessing 3 key factors: prevalence, penetrance, and personal utility. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the suitability of including pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) associated with NPD in population screening by determining their prevalence and penetrance and exploring the personal utility of disclosing results. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cohort study, the frequency of 31 NPD CNVs was determined in patient-participants via exome data. Associated clinical phenotypes were assessed using linked electronic health records. Nine CNVs were selected for disclosure by licensed genetic counselors, and participants’ psychosocial reactions were evaluated using a mixed-methods approach. A primarily adult population receiving medical care at Geisinger, a large integrated health care system in the United States with the only population-based genomic screening program approved for medically relevant results disclosure, was included. The cohort was identified from the Geisinger MyCode Community Health Initiative. Exome and linked electronic health record data were available for this cohort, which was recruited from February 2007 to April 2017. Data were collected for the qualitative analysis April 2017 through February 2018. Analysis began February 2018 and ended December 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The planned outcomes of this study include (1) prevalence estimate of NPD-associated CNVs in an unselected health care system population; (2) penetrance estimate of NPD diagnoses in CNV-positive individuals; and (3) qualitative themes that describe participants’ responses to receiving NPD-associated genomic results. RESULTS: Of 90 595 participants with CNV data, a pathogenic CNV was identified in 708 (0.8%; 436 women [61.6%]; mean [SD] age, 50.04 [18.74] years). Seventy percent (n = 494) had at least 1 associated clinical symptom. Of these, 28.8% (204) of CNV-positive individuals had an NPD code in their electronic health record, compared with 13.3% (11 835 of 89 887) of CNV-negative individuals (odds ratio, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.86-2.61; P < .001); 66.4% (470) of CNV-positive individuals had a history of depression and anxiety compared with 54.6% (49 118 of 89 887) of CNV-negative individuals (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.31-1.80; P < .001). 16p13.11 (71 [0.078%]) and 22q11.2 (108 [0.119%]) were the most prevalent deletions and duplications, respectively. Only 5.8% of individuals (41 of 708) had a previously known genetic diagnosis. Results disclosure was completed for 141 individuals. Positive participant responses included poignant reactions to learning a medical reason for lifelong cognitive and psychiatric disabilities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study informs critical factors central to the development of population-based genomic screening programs and supports the inclusion of NPD in future designs to promote equitable access to clinically useful genomic information. American Medical Association 2020-12 2020-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7376464/ /pubmed/32697297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2159 Text en Copyright 2020 Martin CL et al. JAMA Psychiatry. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Martin, Christa Lese
Wain, Karen E.
Oetjens, Matthew T.
Tolwinski, Kasia
Palen, Emily
Hare-Harris, Abby
Habegger, Lukas
Maxwell, Evan K.
Reid, Jeffrey G.
Walsh, Lauren Kasparson
Myers, Scott M.
Ledbetter, David H.
Identification of Neuropsychiatric Copy Number Variants in a Health Care System Population
title Identification of Neuropsychiatric Copy Number Variants in a Health Care System Population
title_full Identification of Neuropsychiatric Copy Number Variants in a Health Care System Population
title_fullStr Identification of Neuropsychiatric Copy Number Variants in a Health Care System Population
title_full_unstemmed Identification of Neuropsychiatric Copy Number Variants in a Health Care System Population
title_short Identification of Neuropsychiatric Copy Number Variants in a Health Care System Population
title_sort identification of neuropsychiatric copy number variants in a health care system population
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7376464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32697297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2159
work_keys_str_mv AT martinchristalese identificationofneuropsychiatriccopynumbervariantsinahealthcaresystempopulation
AT wainkarene identificationofneuropsychiatriccopynumbervariantsinahealthcaresystempopulation
AT oetjensmatthewt identificationofneuropsychiatriccopynumbervariantsinahealthcaresystempopulation
AT tolwinskikasia identificationofneuropsychiatriccopynumbervariantsinahealthcaresystempopulation
AT palenemily identificationofneuropsychiatriccopynumbervariantsinahealthcaresystempopulation
AT hareharrisabby identificationofneuropsychiatriccopynumbervariantsinahealthcaresystempopulation
AT habeggerlukas identificationofneuropsychiatriccopynumbervariantsinahealthcaresystempopulation
AT maxwellevank identificationofneuropsychiatriccopynumbervariantsinahealthcaresystempopulation
AT reidjeffreyg identificationofneuropsychiatriccopynumbervariantsinahealthcaresystempopulation
AT walshlaurenkasparson identificationofneuropsychiatriccopynumbervariantsinahealthcaresystempopulation
AT myersscottm identificationofneuropsychiatriccopynumbervariantsinahealthcaresystempopulation
AT ledbetterdavidh identificationofneuropsychiatriccopynumbervariantsinahealthcaresystempopulation