Cargando…

Gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine

BACKGROUND: Feed efficiency is a crucial parameter in swine production, given both its economic and environmental impact. The gut microbiota plays an essential role in nutrient digestibility and is, therefore, likely to affect feed efficiency. This study aimed to characterize feed efficiency, fatnes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergamaschi, Matteo, Tiezzi, Francesco, Howard, Jeremy, Huang, Yi Jian, Gray, Kent A., Schillebeeckx, Constantino, McNulty, Nathan P., Maltecca, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7376719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00888-9
_version_ 1783562092185387008
author Bergamaschi, Matteo
Tiezzi, Francesco
Howard, Jeremy
Huang, Yi Jian
Gray, Kent A.
Schillebeeckx, Constantino
McNulty, Nathan P.
Maltecca, Christian
author_facet Bergamaschi, Matteo
Tiezzi, Francesco
Howard, Jeremy
Huang, Yi Jian
Gray, Kent A.
Schillebeeckx, Constantino
McNulty, Nathan P.
Maltecca, Christian
author_sort Bergamaschi, Matteo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Feed efficiency is a crucial parameter in swine production, given both its economic and environmental impact. The gut microbiota plays an essential role in nutrient digestibility and is, therefore, likely to affect feed efficiency. This study aimed to characterize feed efficiency, fatness traits, and gut microbiome composition in three major breeds of domesticated swine and investigate a possible link between feed efficiency and gut microbiota composition. RESULTS: Average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), residual feed intake (RFI), backfat, loin depth, and intramuscular fat of 615 pigs belonging to the Duroc (DR), Landrace (LR), and Large White (LW) breeds were measured. Gut microbiota composition was characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Orthogonal contrasts between paternal line (DR) and maternal lines (LR+LW) and between the two maternal lines (LR versus LW) were performed. Average daily feed intake and ADG were statistically different with DR having lower ADFI and ADG compared to LR and LW. Landrace and LW had a similar ADG and RFI, with higher ADFI and FCR for LW. Alpha diversity was higher in the fecal microbial communities of LR pigs than in those of DR and LW pigs for all time points considered. Duroc communities had significantly higher proportional representation of the Catenibacterium and Clostridium genera compared to LR and LW, while LR pigs had significantly higher proportions of Bacteroides than LW for all time points considered. Amplicon sequence variants from multiple genera (including Anaerovibrio, Bacteroides, Blautia, Clostridium, Dorea, Eubacterium, Faecalibacterium, Lactobacillus, Oscillibacter, and Ruminococcus) were found to be significantly associated with feed efficiency, regardless of the time point considered. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we characterized differences in the composition of the fecal microbiota of three commercially relevant breeds of swine, both over time and between breeds. Correlations between different microbiome compositions and feed efficiency were established. This suggests that the microbial community may contribute to shaping host productive parameters. Moreover, our study provides important insights into how the intestinal microbial community might influence host energy harvesting capacity. A deeper understanding of this process may allow us to modulate the gut microbiome in order to raise more efficient animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7376719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73767192020-07-23 Gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine Bergamaschi, Matteo Tiezzi, Francesco Howard, Jeremy Huang, Yi Jian Gray, Kent A. Schillebeeckx, Constantino McNulty, Nathan P. Maltecca, Christian Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: Feed efficiency is a crucial parameter in swine production, given both its economic and environmental impact. The gut microbiota plays an essential role in nutrient digestibility and is, therefore, likely to affect feed efficiency. This study aimed to characterize feed efficiency, fatness traits, and gut microbiome composition in three major breeds of domesticated swine and investigate a possible link between feed efficiency and gut microbiota composition. RESULTS: Average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), residual feed intake (RFI), backfat, loin depth, and intramuscular fat of 615 pigs belonging to the Duroc (DR), Landrace (LR), and Large White (LW) breeds were measured. Gut microbiota composition was characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Orthogonal contrasts between paternal line (DR) and maternal lines (LR+LW) and between the two maternal lines (LR versus LW) were performed. Average daily feed intake and ADG were statistically different with DR having lower ADFI and ADG compared to LR and LW. Landrace and LW had a similar ADG and RFI, with higher ADFI and FCR for LW. Alpha diversity was higher in the fecal microbial communities of LR pigs than in those of DR and LW pigs for all time points considered. Duroc communities had significantly higher proportional representation of the Catenibacterium and Clostridium genera compared to LR and LW, while LR pigs had significantly higher proportions of Bacteroides than LW for all time points considered. Amplicon sequence variants from multiple genera (including Anaerovibrio, Bacteroides, Blautia, Clostridium, Dorea, Eubacterium, Faecalibacterium, Lactobacillus, Oscillibacter, and Ruminococcus) were found to be significantly associated with feed efficiency, regardless of the time point considered. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we characterized differences in the composition of the fecal microbiota of three commercially relevant breeds of swine, both over time and between breeds. Correlations between different microbiome compositions and feed efficiency were established. This suggests that the microbial community may contribute to shaping host productive parameters. Moreover, our study provides important insights into how the intestinal microbial community might influence host energy harvesting capacity. A deeper understanding of this process may allow us to modulate the gut microbiome in order to raise more efficient animals. BioMed Central 2020-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7376719/ /pubmed/32698902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00888-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bergamaschi, Matteo
Tiezzi, Francesco
Howard, Jeremy
Huang, Yi Jian
Gray, Kent A.
Schillebeeckx, Constantino
McNulty, Nathan P.
Maltecca, Christian
Gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine
title Gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine
title_full Gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine
title_fullStr Gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine
title_full_unstemmed Gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine
title_short Gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine
title_sort gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7376719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00888-9
work_keys_str_mv AT bergamaschimatteo gutmicrobiomecompositiondifferencesamongbreedsimpactfeedefficiencyinswine
AT tiezzifrancesco gutmicrobiomecompositiondifferencesamongbreedsimpactfeedefficiencyinswine
AT howardjeremy gutmicrobiomecompositiondifferencesamongbreedsimpactfeedefficiencyinswine
AT huangyijian gutmicrobiomecompositiondifferencesamongbreedsimpactfeedefficiencyinswine
AT graykenta gutmicrobiomecompositiondifferencesamongbreedsimpactfeedefficiencyinswine
AT schillebeeckxconstantino gutmicrobiomecompositiondifferencesamongbreedsimpactfeedefficiencyinswine
AT mcnultynathanp gutmicrobiomecompositiondifferencesamongbreedsimpactfeedefficiencyinswine
AT malteccachristian gutmicrobiomecompositiondifferencesamongbreedsimpactfeedefficiencyinswine