Cargando…
Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project
To evaluate the feasibility of the Sunset semicontinuous organic and elemental carbon (OC/EC) monitor, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sponsored the deployment of this monitor at Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) sites with OC and EC measurements via quartz fiber filter collection in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7376833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos10050287 |
_version_ | 1783562108030418944 |
---|---|
author | Brown, Steven Minor, Hilary O’Brien, Theresa Hameed, Yousaf Feenstra, Brandon Kuebler, Dustin Wetherell, Will Day, Robert Tun, Richard Landis, Elizabeth Rice, Joann |
author_facet | Brown, Steven Minor, Hilary O’Brien, Theresa Hameed, Yousaf Feenstra, Brandon Kuebler, Dustin Wetherell, Will Day, Robert Tun, Richard Landis, Elizabeth Rice, Joann |
author_sort | Brown, Steven |
collection | PubMed |
description | To evaluate the feasibility of the Sunset semicontinuous organic and elemental carbon (OC/EC) monitor, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sponsored the deployment of this monitor at Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) sites with OC and EC measurements via quartz fiber filter collection in Chicago, Illinois; Houston, Texas; Las Vegas, Nevada; St. Louis, Missouri; Rubidoux, California; and Washington, D.C. Houston, St. Louis, and Washington also had collocated Aethalometer black carbon (BC) measurements. Sunset OC generally compared well with the CSN OC (r(2) = 0.73 across five sites); the Sunset/CSN OC ratio was, on average, 1.06, with a range among sites of 0.96 to 1.12. Sunset thermal EC and CSN EC did not compare as well, with an overall r(2) of 0.22, in part because 26% of the hourly Sunset EC measurements were below the detection limit. Sunset optical EC had a much better correlation to CSN EC (r(2) = 0.67 across all sites), with an average Sunset/CSN ratio of 0.90 (range of 0.7 to 1.08). There was also a high correlation of Sunset optical EC with Aethalometer BC (r(2) = 0.77 across all sites), though with a larger bias (average Sunset/Aethalometer ratio of 0.56). When the Sunset instrument was working well, OC and OptEC data were comparable to CSN OC and EC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7376833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73768332020-07-23 Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project Brown, Steven Minor, Hilary O’Brien, Theresa Hameed, Yousaf Feenstra, Brandon Kuebler, Dustin Wetherell, Will Day, Robert Tun, Richard Landis, Elizabeth Rice, Joann Atmosphere (Basel) Article To evaluate the feasibility of the Sunset semicontinuous organic and elemental carbon (OC/EC) monitor, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sponsored the deployment of this monitor at Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) sites with OC and EC measurements via quartz fiber filter collection in Chicago, Illinois; Houston, Texas; Las Vegas, Nevada; St. Louis, Missouri; Rubidoux, California; and Washington, D.C. Houston, St. Louis, and Washington also had collocated Aethalometer black carbon (BC) measurements. Sunset OC generally compared well with the CSN OC (r(2) = 0.73 across five sites); the Sunset/CSN OC ratio was, on average, 1.06, with a range among sites of 0.96 to 1.12. Sunset thermal EC and CSN EC did not compare as well, with an overall r(2) of 0.22, in part because 26% of the hourly Sunset EC measurements were below the detection limit. Sunset optical EC had a much better correlation to CSN EC (r(2) = 0.67 across all sites), with an average Sunset/CSN ratio of 0.90 (range of 0.7 to 1.08). There was also a high correlation of Sunset optical EC with Aethalometer BC (r(2) = 0.77 across all sites), though with a larger bias (average Sunset/Aethalometer ratio of 0.56). When the Sunset instrument was working well, OC and OptEC data were comparable to CSN OC and EC. 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC7376833/ /pubmed/32704395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos10050287 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Brown, Steven Minor, Hilary O’Brien, Theresa Hameed, Yousaf Feenstra, Brandon Kuebler, Dustin Wetherell, Will Day, Robert Tun, Richard Landis, Elizabeth Rice, Joann Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project |
title | Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project |
title_full | Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project |
title_fullStr | Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project |
title_short | Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project |
title_sort | review of sunset oc/ec instrument measurements during the epa’s sunset carbon evaluation project |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7376833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos10050287 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brownsteven reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject AT minorhilary reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject AT obrientheresa reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject AT hameedyousaf reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject AT feenstrabrandon reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject AT kueblerdustin reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject AT wetherellwill reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject AT dayrobert reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject AT tunrichard reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject AT landiselizabeth reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject AT ricejoann reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject |