Cargando…

Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project

To evaluate the feasibility of the Sunset semicontinuous organic and elemental carbon (OC/EC) monitor, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sponsored the deployment of this monitor at Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) sites with OC and EC measurements via quartz fiber filter collection in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Steven, Minor, Hilary, O’Brien, Theresa, Hameed, Yousaf, Feenstra, Brandon, Kuebler, Dustin, Wetherell, Will, Day, Robert, Tun, Richard, Landis, Elizabeth, Rice, Joann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7376833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704395
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos10050287
_version_ 1783562108030418944
author Brown, Steven
Minor, Hilary
O’Brien, Theresa
Hameed, Yousaf
Feenstra, Brandon
Kuebler, Dustin
Wetherell, Will
Day, Robert
Tun, Richard
Landis, Elizabeth
Rice, Joann
author_facet Brown, Steven
Minor, Hilary
O’Brien, Theresa
Hameed, Yousaf
Feenstra, Brandon
Kuebler, Dustin
Wetherell, Will
Day, Robert
Tun, Richard
Landis, Elizabeth
Rice, Joann
author_sort Brown, Steven
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the feasibility of the Sunset semicontinuous organic and elemental carbon (OC/EC) monitor, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sponsored the deployment of this monitor at Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) sites with OC and EC measurements via quartz fiber filter collection in Chicago, Illinois; Houston, Texas; Las Vegas, Nevada; St. Louis, Missouri; Rubidoux, California; and Washington, D.C. Houston, St. Louis, and Washington also had collocated Aethalometer black carbon (BC) measurements. Sunset OC generally compared well with the CSN OC (r(2) = 0.73 across five sites); the Sunset/CSN OC ratio was, on average, 1.06, with a range among sites of 0.96 to 1.12. Sunset thermal EC and CSN EC did not compare as well, with an overall r(2) of 0.22, in part because 26% of the hourly Sunset EC measurements were below the detection limit. Sunset optical EC had a much better correlation to CSN EC (r(2) = 0.67 across all sites), with an average Sunset/CSN ratio of 0.90 (range of 0.7 to 1.08). There was also a high correlation of Sunset optical EC with Aethalometer BC (r(2) = 0.77 across all sites), though with a larger bias (average Sunset/Aethalometer ratio of 0.56). When the Sunset instrument was working well, OC and OptEC data were comparable to CSN OC and EC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7376833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73768332020-07-23 Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project Brown, Steven Minor, Hilary O’Brien, Theresa Hameed, Yousaf Feenstra, Brandon Kuebler, Dustin Wetherell, Will Day, Robert Tun, Richard Landis, Elizabeth Rice, Joann Atmosphere (Basel) Article To evaluate the feasibility of the Sunset semicontinuous organic and elemental carbon (OC/EC) monitor, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sponsored the deployment of this monitor at Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) sites with OC and EC measurements via quartz fiber filter collection in Chicago, Illinois; Houston, Texas; Las Vegas, Nevada; St. Louis, Missouri; Rubidoux, California; and Washington, D.C. Houston, St. Louis, and Washington also had collocated Aethalometer black carbon (BC) measurements. Sunset OC generally compared well with the CSN OC (r(2) = 0.73 across five sites); the Sunset/CSN OC ratio was, on average, 1.06, with a range among sites of 0.96 to 1.12. Sunset thermal EC and CSN EC did not compare as well, with an overall r(2) of 0.22, in part because 26% of the hourly Sunset EC measurements were below the detection limit. Sunset optical EC had a much better correlation to CSN EC (r(2) = 0.67 across all sites), with an average Sunset/CSN ratio of 0.90 (range of 0.7 to 1.08). There was also a high correlation of Sunset optical EC with Aethalometer BC (r(2) = 0.77 across all sites), though with a larger bias (average Sunset/Aethalometer ratio of 0.56). When the Sunset instrument was working well, OC and OptEC data were comparable to CSN OC and EC. 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC7376833/ /pubmed/32704395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos10050287 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Brown, Steven
Minor, Hilary
O’Brien, Theresa
Hameed, Yousaf
Feenstra, Brandon
Kuebler, Dustin
Wetherell, Will
Day, Robert
Tun, Richard
Landis, Elizabeth
Rice, Joann
Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project
title Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project
title_full Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project
title_fullStr Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project
title_full_unstemmed Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project
title_short Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA’s Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project
title_sort review of sunset oc/ec instrument measurements during the epa’s sunset carbon evaluation project
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7376833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704395
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos10050287
work_keys_str_mv AT brownsteven reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject
AT minorhilary reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject
AT obrientheresa reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject
AT hameedyousaf reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject
AT feenstrabrandon reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject
AT kueblerdustin reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject
AT wetherellwill reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject
AT dayrobert reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject
AT tunrichard reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject
AT landiselizabeth reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject
AT ricejoann reviewofsunsetocecinstrumentmeasurementsduringtheepassunsetcarbonevaluationproject