Cargando…

Managing residents in difficulty within CBME residency educational systems: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Best practices in managing residents in difficulty (RID) in the era of competency-based medical education (CBME) are not well described. This scoping review aimed to inventory the current literature and identify major themes in the articles that address or employ CBME as part of the iden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pirie, Jonathan, St. Amant, Lisa, Glover Takahashi, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7376876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32703231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02150-0
_version_ 1783562116777639936
author Pirie, Jonathan
St. Amant, Lisa
Glover Takahashi, Susan
author_facet Pirie, Jonathan
St. Amant, Lisa
Glover Takahashi, Susan
author_sort Pirie, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Best practices in managing residents in difficulty (RID) in the era of competency-based medical education (CBME) are not well described. This scoping review aimed to inventory the current literature and identify major themes in the articles that address or employ CBME as part of the identification and remediation of residents in difficulty. METHODS: Articles published between 2011 to 2017 were included if they were about postgraduate medical education, RID, and offered information to inform the structure and/or processes of CBME. All three reviewers performed a primary screening, followed by a secondary screening of abstracts of the chosen articles, and then a final comprehensive sub-analysis of the 11 articles identified as using a CBME framework. RESULTS: Of 165 articles initially identified, 92 qualified for secondary screening; the 63 remaining articles underwent full-text abstracting. Ten themes were identified from the content analysis with “identification of RID” (41%) and “defining and classifying deficiencies” (30%) being the most frequent. In the CBME article sub-analysis, the most frequent themes were: need to identify RID (64%), improving assessment tools (45%), and roles and responsibilities of players involved in remediation (27%). Almost half of the CBME articles were published in 2016–2017. CONCLUSIONS: Although CBME programs have been implemented for many years, articles have only recently begun specifically addressing RID within a competency framework. Much work is needed to describe the sequenced progression, tailored learning experiences, and competency-focused instruction. Finally, future research should focus on the outcomes of remediation in CBME programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7376876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73768762020-07-23 Managing residents in difficulty within CBME residency educational systems: a scoping review Pirie, Jonathan St. Amant, Lisa Glover Takahashi, Susan BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Best practices in managing residents in difficulty (RID) in the era of competency-based medical education (CBME) are not well described. This scoping review aimed to inventory the current literature and identify major themes in the articles that address or employ CBME as part of the identification and remediation of residents in difficulty. METHODS: Articles published between 2011 to 2017 were included if they were about postgraduate medical education, RID, and offered information to inform the structure and/or processes of CBME. All three reviewers performed a primary screening, followed by a secondary screening of abstracts of the chosen articles, and then a final comprehensive sub-analysis of the 11 articles identified as using a CBME framework. RESULTS: Of 165 articles initially identified, 92 qualified for secondary screening; the 63 remaining articles underwent full-text abstracting. Ten themes were identified from the content analysis with “identification of RID” (41%) and “defining and classifying deficiencies” (30%) being the most frequent. In the CBME article sub-analysis, the most frequent themes were: need to identify RID (64%), improving assessment tools (45%), and roles and responsibilities of players involved in remediation (27%). Almost half of the CBME articles were published in 2016–2017. CONCLUSIONS: Although CBME programs have been implemented for many years, articles have only recently begun specifically addressing RID within a competency framework. Much work is needed to describe the sequenced progression, tailored learning experiences, and competency-focused instruction. Finally, future research should focus on the outcomes of remediation in CBME programs. BioMed Central 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7376876/ /pubmed/32703231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02150-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pirie, Jonathan
St. Amant, Lisa
Glover Takahashi, Susan
Managing residents in difficulty within CBME residency educational systems: a scoping review
title Managing residents in difficulty within CBME residency educational systems: a scoping review
title_full Managing residents in difficulty within CBME residency educational systems: a scoping review
title_fullStr Managing residents in difficulty within CBME residency educational systems: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Managing residents in difficulty within CBME residency educational systems: a scoping review
title_short Managing residents in difficulty within CBME residency educational systems: a scoping review
title_sort managing residents in difficulty within cbme residency educational systems: a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7376876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32703231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02150-0
work_keys_str_mv AT piriejonathan managingresidentsindifficultywithincbmeresidencyeducationalsystemsascopingreview
AT stamantlisa managingresidentsindifficultywithincbmeresidencyeducationalsystemsascopingreview
AT glovertakahashisusan managingresidentsindifficultywithincbmeresidencyeducationalsystemsascopingreview