Chromosomal polymorphisms associated with reproductive outcomes after IVF-ET

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of the detail type of chromosomal polymorphisms (1/9/16qh(+/−), D/G group polymorphisms, and inv(9)) on the IVF-ET outcomes. METHODS: A total of 1335 infertile couples undergoing IVF/ICSI were enrolled and comprehensively analyzed the correlation between three detail types of chromosomal polymorphisms (1/9/16qh(+/−), D/G group polymorphisms, and inv(9)) and the outcome of IVF/ICSI embryo transfer. The fertilized rate, cleaved embryo rate, good-quality embryo rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and early stage miscarriage rate were compared between the chromosomal polymorphisms groups and the control group. RESULTS: Both the inv(9) and D/G group chromosomal polymorphisms related to female infertility significantly lead to a lower 2PN cleavage rate (86.44% vs. 97.58% and 90.67% vs. 97.58%, respectively, P < 0.05) undergoing IVF insemination, the inv(9) adversely increasing the early miscarriage rate, either undergoing IVF (21.4% vs. 3.0%, P < 0.05) or ICSI (50.0% vs. 2.0%, P < 0.05) insemination, female carriers (23.08% vs. 2.87%, P < 0.05) or male carriers (44.44% vs. 2.87%, P < 0.05). For D/G groups, ICSI insemination may increase the implantation rate (44.8% vs. 23.69%, P < 0.05) and clinical pregnancy rate (78.6% vs. 40.65%, P < 0.05). 1/9/16qh(+/−) had no apparent adverse effect on the patient’s clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that chromosome karyotype analysis is necessary for IVF patients in clinical practice; we should afford individual genetic counseling suggestion according to the polymorphism types.