Cargando…

The development of categorisation and conceptual thinking in early childhood: methods and limitations

We present a systematic and qualitative review of academic literature on early conceptual development (0–24 months of age), with an emphasis on methodological aspects. The final sample of our review included 281 studies reported in 115 articles. The main aims of the article were four: first, to orga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alessandroni, Nicolás, Rodríguez, Cintia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7377002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32700155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41155-020-00154-9
_version_ 1783562137110577152
author Alessandroni, Nicolás
Rodríguez, Cintia
author_facet Alessandroni, Nicolás
Rodríguez, Cintia
author_sort Alessandroni, Nicolás
collection PubMed
description We present a systematic and qualitative review of academic literature on early conceptual development (0–24 months of age), with an emphasis on methodological aspects. The final sample of our review included 281 studies reported in 115 articles. The main aims of the article were four: first, to organise studies into sets according to methodological similarities and differences; second, to elaborate on the methodological procedures that characterise each set; third, to circumscribe the empirical indicators that different sets of studies consider as proof of the existence of concepts in early childhood; last, to identify methodological limitations and to propose possible ways to overcome them. We grouped the studies into five sets: preference and habituation experiments, category extension tasks, object sorting tasks, sequential touching tasks and object examination tasks. In the “Results” section, we review the core features of each set of studies. In the “Discussion” and “Conclusions” sections, we describe, for one thing, the most relevant methodological shortcomings. We end by arguing that a situated, semiotic and pragmatic perspective that emphasises the importance of ecological validity could open up new avenues of research to better understand the development of concepts in early childhood.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7377002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73770022020-07-27 The development of categorisation and conceptual thinking in early childhood: methods and limitations Alessandroni, Nicolás Rodríguez, Cintia Psicol Reflex Crit Review We present a systematic and qualitative review of academic literature on early conceptual development (0–24 months of age), with an emphasis on methodological aspects. The final sample of our review included 281 studies reported in 115 articles. The main aims of the article were four: first, to organise studies into sets according to methodological similarities and differences; second, to elaborate on the methodological procedures that characterise each set; third, to circumscribe the empirical indicators that different sets of studies consider as proof of the existence of concepts in early childhood; last, to identify methodological limitations and to propose possible ways to overcome them. We grouped the studies into five sets: preference and habituation experiments, category extension tasks, object sorting tasks, sequential touching tasks and object examination tasks. In the “Results” section, we review the core features of each set of studies. In the “Discussion” and “Conclusions” sections, we describe, for one thing, the most relevant methodological shortcomings. We end by arguing that a situated, semiotic and pragmatic perspective that emphasises the importance of ecological validity could open up new avenues of research to better understand the development of concepts in early childhood. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7377002/ /pubmed/32700155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41155-020-00154-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Alessandroni, Nicolás
Rodríguez, Cintia
The development of categorisation and conceptual thinking in early childhood: methods and limitations
title The development of categorisation and conceptual thinking in early childhood: methods and limitations
title_full The development of categorisation and conceptual thinking in early childhood: methods and limitations
title_fullStr The development of categorisation and conceptual thinking in early childhood: methods and limitations
title_full_unstemmed The development of categorisation and conceptual thinking in early childhood: methods and limitations
title_short The development of categorisation and conceptual thinking in early childhood: methods and limitations
title_sort development of categorisation and conceptual thinking in early childhood: methods and limitations
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7377002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32700155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41155-020-00154-9
work_keys_str_mv AT alessandroninicolas thedevelopmentofcategorisationandconceptualthinkinginearlychildhoodmethodsandlimitations
AT rodriguezcintia thedevelopmentofcategorisationandconceptualthinkinginearlychildhoodmethodsandlimitations
AT alessandroninicolas developmentofcategorisationandconceptualthinkinginearlychildhoodmethodsandlimitations
AT rodriguezcintia developmentofcategorisationandconceptualthinkinginearlychildhoodmethodsandlimitations