Cargando…

Comparison of Maternal Histories and Exposures in Children With Isolated Anorectal Malformation Versus Anorectal Malformation With Genitourinary Anomalies

Introduction To our knowledge, there are no studies to date that have compared patients with isolated anorectal malformation (ARM) to patients with ARM and an associated genitourinary (GU) malformation despite a possible etiological difference between these two entities. We examined the differences...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Mark A, Bucher, Brian T, Reeder, Ron W, Levitt, Marc, Avansino, Jeffrey, Durham, Megan M, Calkins, Casey M, Wood, Richard, Drake, Kaylea, Rollins, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7377652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32714700
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8762
_version_ 1783562249615441920
author Taylor, Mark A
Bucher, Brian T
Reeder, Ron W
Levitt, Marc
Avansino, Jeffrey
Durham, Megan M
Calkins, Casey M
Wood, Richard
Drake, Kaylea
Rollins, Michael
author_facet Taylor, Mark A
Bucher, Brian T
Reeder, Ron W
Levitt, Marc
Avansino, Jeffrey
Durham, Megan M
Calkins, Casey M
Wood, Richard
Drake, Kaylea
Rollins, Michael
author_sort Taylor, Mark A
collection PubMed
description Introduction To our knowledge, there are no studies to date that have compared patients with isolated anorectal malformation (ARM) to patients with ARM and an associated genitourinary (GU) malformation despite a possible etiological difference between these two entities. We examined the differences in maternal and prenatal exposures and comorbidities between patients with isolated ARM and patients with ARM and associated GU malformations. Materials and methods A retrospective cohort study of children with ARM, enrolled in the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) between February 2017 and October 2019, was performed comparing those with isolated ARM to those with ARM and associated GU anomalies (GU +/- additional anomalies) as well as to those with ARM and a GU anomaly with no anomaly of any other system (GU-only). We compared the prevalence of prematurity, family history of colorectal disorders, as well as maternal and prenatal comorbidities and exposures between these two cohorts and the isolated ARM cohort. Results A total of 505 patients (117 with isolated ARM and 388 with ARM and associated GU anomalies) were enrolled. Of the 388 patients with ARM and associated GU anomalies, 48 had an ARM with a GU anomaly without an anomaly in any other system. There was an increased prevalence of premature births in the GU +/- additional anomalies cohort compared to the isolated ARM cohort (27 vs 14%, p=0.003). This difference was not seen in the GU-only cohort. There was no difference between the cohorts regarding prevalence of family history of ARM or maternal and prenatal comorbidities or exposures. Conclusions Patients with an ARM and an associated GU anomaly with or without other congenital anomalies are more likely to be born prematurely compared to patients with an isolated ARM. Parents of these children should be counseled on this increased risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7377652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73776522020-07-24 Comparison of Maternal Histories and Exposures in Children With Isolated Anorectal Malformation Versus Anorectal Malformation With Genitourinary Anomalies Taylor, Mark A Bucher, Brian T Reeder, Ron W Levitt, Marc Avansino, Jeffrey Durham, Megan M Calkins, Casey M Wood, Richard Drake, Kaylea Rollins, Michael Cureus Obstetrics/Gynecology Introduction To our knowledge, there are no studies to date that have compared patients with isolated anorectal malformation (ARM) to patients with ARM and an associated genitourinary (GU) malformation despite a possible etiological difference between these two entities. We examined the differences in maternal and prenatal exposures and comorbidities between patients with isolated ARM and patients with ARM and associated GU malformations. Materials and methods A retrospective cohort study of children with ARM, enrolled in the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) between February 2017 and October 2019, was performed comparing those with isolated ARM to those with ARM and associated GU anomalies (GU +/- additional anomalies) as well as to those with ARM and a GU anomaly with no anomaly of any other system (GU-only). We compared the prevalence of prematurity, family history of colorectal disorders, as well as maternal and prenatal comorbidities and exposures between these two cohorts and the isolated ARM cohort. Results A total of 505 patients (117 with isolated ARM and 388 with ARM and associated GU anomalies) were enrolled. Of the 388 patients with ARM and associated GU anomalies, 48 had an ARM with a GU anomaly without an anomaly in any other system. There was an increased prevalence of premature births in the GU +/- additional anomalies cohort compared to the isolated ARM cohort (27 vs 14%, p=0.003). This difference was not seen in the GU-only cohort. There was no difference between the cohorts regarding prevalence of family history of ARM or maternal and prenatal comorbidities or exposures. Conclusions Patients with an ARM and an associated GU anomaly with or without other congenital anomalies are more likely to be born prematurely compared to patients with an isolated ARM. Parents of these children should be counseled on this increased risk. Cureus 2020-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7377652/ /pubmed/32714700 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8762 Text en Copyright © 2020, Taylor et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Obstetrics/Gynecology
Taylor, Mark A
Bucher, Brian T
Reeder, Ron W
Levitt, Marc
Avansino, Jeffrey
Durham, Megan M
Calkins, Casey M
Wood, Richard
Drake, Kaylea
Rollins, Michael
Comparison of Maternal Histories and Exposures in Children With Isolated Anorectal Malformation Versus Anorectal Malformation With Genitourinary Anomalies
title Comparison of Maternal Histories and Exposures in Children With Isolated Anorectal Malformation Versus Anorectal Malformation With Genitourinary Anomalies
title_full Comparison of Maternal Histories and Exposures in Children With Isolated Anorectal Malformation Versus Anorectal Malformation With Genitourinary Anomalies
title_fullStr Comparison of Maternal Histories and Exposures in Children With Isolated Anorectal Malformation Versus Anorectal Malformation With Genitourinary Anomalies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Maternal Histories and Exposures in Children With Isolated Anorectal Malformation Versus Anorectal Malformation With Genitourinary Anomalies
title_short Comparison of Maternal Histories and Exposures in Children With Isolated Anorectal Malformation Versus Anorectal Malformation With Genitourinary Anomalies
title_sort comparison of maternal histories and exposures in children with isolated anorectal malformation versus anorectal malformation with genitourinary anomalies
topic Obstetrics/Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7377652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32714700
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8762
work_keys_str_mv AT taylormarka comparisonofmaternalhistoriesandexposuresinchildrenwithisolatedanorectalmalformationversusanorectalmalformationwithgenitourinaryanomalies
AT bucherbriant comparisonofmaternalhistoriesandexposuresinchildrenwithisolatedanorectalmalformationversusanorectalmalformationwithgenitourinaryanomalies
AT reederronw comparisonofmaternalhistoriesandexposuresinchildrenwithisolatedanorectalmalformationversusanorectalmalformationwithgenitourinaryanomalies
AT levittmarc comparisonofmaternalhistoriesandexposuresinchildrenwithisolatedanorectalmalformationversusanorectalmalformationwithgenitourinaryanomalies
AT avansinojeffrey comparisonofmaternalhistoriesandexposuresinchildrenwithisolatedanorectalmalformationversusanorectalmalformationwithgenitourinaryanomalies
AT durhammeganm comparisonofmaternalhistoriesandexposuresinchildrenwithisolatedanorectalmalformationversusanorectalmalformationwithgenitourinaryanomalies
AT calkinscaseym comparisonofmaternalhistoriesandexposuresinchildrenwithisolatedanorectalmalformationversusanorectalmalformationwithgenitourinaryanomalies
AT woodrichard comparisonofmaternalhistoriesandexposuresinchildrenwithisolatedanorectalmalformationversusanorectalmalformationwithgenitourinaryanomalies
AT drakekaylea comparisonofmaternalhistoriesandexposuresinchildrenwithisolatedanorectalmalformationversusanorectalmalformationwithgenitourinaryanomalies
AT rollinsmichael comparisonofmaternalhistoriesandexposuresinchildrenwithisolatedanorectalmalformationversusanorectalmalformationwithgenitourinaryanomalies