Cargando…
Coronavirus Disease 2019’s (COVID-19’s) Silver Lining—Through the Eyes of Radiation Oncology Fellows
PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has propelled health care workers to the front lines against the pandemic. In addition to anxiety related to infection risks, trainees have the additional burden of learning and career planning while providing care in an uncertain and rapidly...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7377812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32838070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.07.004 |
_version_ | 1783562286022000640 |
---|---|
author | Pilar, Avinash Gravel, Samuel Bergeron Croke, Jennifer Soliman, Hany Chung, Peter Wong, Rebecca K.S. |
author_facet | Pilar, Avinash Gravel, Samuel Bergeron Croke, Jennifer Soliman, Hany Chung, Peter Wong, Rebecca K.S. |
author_sort | Pilar, Avinash |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has propelled health care workers to the front lines against the pandemic. In addition to anxiety related to infection risks, trainees have the additional burden of learning and career planning while providing care in an uncertain and rapidly changing environment. We conducted a survey to evaluate the practical and psychosocial impact on radiation oncology fellows during the first month of the pandemic. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 4-part survey was designed and distributed to the fellows in our program. The survey was designed to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on scope of activity and well-being (“Impact on You”) and to identify key lessons learned and social factors (“About You”) using Likert scales and open-ended response options. The survey included items from the Oldenburg Burnout questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 17 participants (71%) responded to the survey. Although there was a significant reduction in the mean time spent on in-person clinics (13.5 h/wk [pre-COVID] vs 9.3 h/wk [3 weeks into the COVID emergency response]; P = .002), this was replaced by virtual consults and other COVID-related activities. The proportion of respondents demonstrating features of burnout in the domains of “disengagement” and “exhaustion” was 71% and 64%, respectively. However, there was also evidence of resilience, with 47% respondents “feeling energized.” Top “concerns” and “negative changes” identified related to learning, infection risk and safety, patient care, coping, and concerns about their home country. Top “positive changes” highlighted include work culture, appreciation for leadership caring for the team, the insistence on evidence to guide change, and the implementation of virtual health care. CONCLUSIONS: Negative impact needs to be anticipated, acknowledged, and managed. We anticipate understanding the positives that have emerged under these extraordinary circumstances is the “silver lining” of the pandemic, giving us tools and the best leverage to plan for the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7377812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73778122020-07-24 Coronavirus Disease 2019’s (COVID-19’s) Silver Lining—Through the Eyes of Radiation Oncology Fellows Pilar, Avinash Gravel, Samuel Bergeron Croke, Jennifer Soliman, Hany Chung, Peter Wong, Rebecca K.S. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has propelled health care workers to the front lines against the pandemic. In addition to anxiety related to infection risks, trainees have the additional burden of learning and career planning while providing care in an uncertain and rapidly changing environment. We conducted a survey to evaluate the practical and psychosocial impact on radiation oncology fellows during the first month of the pandemic. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 4-part survey was designed and distributed to the fellows in our program. The survey was designed to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on scope of activity and well-being (“Impact on You”) and to identify key lessons learned and social factors (“About You”) using Likert scales and open-ended response options. The survey included items from the Oldenburg Burnout questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 17 participants (71%) responded to the survey. Although there was a significant reduction in the mean time spent on in-person clinics (13.5 h/wk [pre-COVID] vs 9.3 h/wk [3 weeks into the COVID emergency response]; P = .002), this was replaced by virtual consults and other COVID-related activities. The proportion of respondents demonstrating features of burnout in the domains of “disengagement” and “exhaustion” was 71% and 64%, respectively. However, there was also evidence of resilience, with 47% respondents “feeling energized.” Top “concerns” and “negative changes” identified related to learning, infection risk and safety, patient care, coping, and concerns about their home country. Top “positive changes” highlighted include work culture, appreciation for leadership caring for the team, the insistence on evidence to guide change, and the implementation of virtual health care. CONCLUSIONS: Negative impact needs to be anticipated, acknowledged, and managed. We anticipate understanding the positives that have emerged under these extraordinary circumstances is the “silver lining” of the pandemic, giving us tools and the best leverage to plan for the future. Elsevier 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7377812/ /pubmed/32838070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.07.004 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Pilar, Avinash Gravel, Samuel Bergeron Croke, Jennifer Soliman, Hany Chung, Peter Wong, Rebecca K.S. Coronavirus Disease 2019’s (COVID-19’s) Silver Lining—Through the Eyes of Radiation Oncology Fellows |
title | Coronavirus Disease 2019’s (COVID-19’s) Silver Lining—Through the Eyes of Radiation Oncology Fellows |
title_full | Coronavirus Disease 2019’s (COVID-19’s) Silver Lining—Through the Eyes of Radiation Oncology Fellows |
title_fullStr | Coronavirus Disease 2019’s (COVID-19’s) Silver Lining—Through the Eyes of Radiation Oncology Fellows |
title_full_unstemmed | Coronavirus Disease 2019’s (COVID-19’s) Silver Lining—Through the Eyes of Radiation Oncology Fellows |
title_short | Coronavirus Disease 2019’s (COVID-19’s) Silver Lining—Through the Eyes of Radiation Oncology Fellows |
title_sort | coronavirus disease 2019’s (covid-19’s) silver lining—through the eyes of radiation oncology fellows |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7377812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32838070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.07.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pilaravinash coronavirusdisease2019scovid19ssilverliningthroughtheeyesofradiationoncologyfellows AT gravelsamuelbergeron coronavirusdisease2019scovid19ssilverliningthroughtheeyesofradiationoncologyfellows AT crokejennifer coronavirusdisease2019scovid19ssilverliningthroughtheeyesofradiationoncologyfellows AT solimanhany coronavirusdisease2019scovid19ssilverliningthroughtheeyesofradiationoncologyfellows AT chungpeter coronavirusdisease2019scovid19ssilverliningthroughtheeyesofradiationoncologyfellows AT wongrebeccaks coronavirusdisease2019scovid19ssilverliningthroughtheeyesofradiationoncologyfellows |