Cargando…

Coronavirus Disease 2019’s (COVID-19’s) Silver Lining—Through the Eyes of Radiation Oncology Fellows

PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has propelled health care workers to the front lines against the pandemic. In addition to anxiety related to infection risks, trainees have the additional burden of learning and career planning while providing care in an uncertain and rapidly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pilar, Avinash, Gravel, Samuel Bergeron, Croke, Jennifer, Soliman, Hany, Chung, Peter, Wong, Rebecca K.S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7377812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32838070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.07.004
_version_ 1783562286022000640
author Pilar, Avinash
Gravel, Samuel Bergeron
Croke, Jennifer
Soliman, Hany
Chung, Peter
Wong, Rebecca K.S.
author_facet Pilar, Avinash
Gravel, Samuel Bergeron
Croke, Jennifer
Soliman, Hany
Chung, Peter
Wong, Rebecca K.S.
author_sort Pilar, Avinash
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has propelled health care workers to the front lines against the pandemic. In addition to anxiety related to infection risks, trainees have the additional burden of learning and career planning while providing care in an uncertain and rapidly changing environment. We conducted a survey to evaluate the practical and psychosocial impact on radiation oncology fellows during the first month of the pandemic. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 4-part survey was designed and distributed to the fellows in our program. The survey was designed to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on scope of activity and well-being (“Impact on You”) and to identify key lessons learned and social factors (“About You”) using Likert scales and open-ended response options. The survey included items from the Oldenburg Burnout questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 17 participants (71%) responded to the survey. Although there was a significant reduction in the mean time spent on in-person clinics (13.5 h/wk [pre-COVID] vs 9.3 h/wk [3 weeks into the COVID emergency response]; P = .002), this was replaced by virtual consults and other COVID-related activities. The proportion of respondents demonstrating features of burnout in the domains of “disengagement” and “exhaustion” was 71% and 64%, respectively. However, there was also evidence of resilience, with 47% respondents “feeling energized.” Top “concerns” and “negative changes” identified related to learning, infection risk and safety, patient care, coping, and concerns about their home country. Top “positive changes” highlighted include work culture, appreciation for leadership caring for the team, the insistence on evidence to guide change, and the implementation of virtual health care. CONCLUSIONS: Negative impact needs to be anticipated, acknowledged, and managed. We anticipate understanding the positives that have emerged under these extraordinary circumstances is the “silver lining” of the pandemic, giving us tools and the best leverage to plan for the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7377812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73778122020-07-24 Coronavirus Disease 2019’s (COVID-19’s) Silver Lining—Through the Eyes of Radiation Oncology Fellows Pilar, Avinash Gravel, Samuel Bergeron Croke, Jennifer Soliman, Hany Chung, Peter Wong, Rebecca K.S. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has propelled health care workers to the front lines against the pandemic. In addition to anxiety related to infection risks, trainees have the additional burden of learning and career planning while providing care in an uncertain and rapidly changing environment. We conducted a survey to evaluate the practical and psychosocial impact on radiation oncology fellows during the first month of the pandemic. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 4-part survey was designed and distributed to the fellows in our program. The survey was designed to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on scope of activity and well-being (“Impact on You”) and to identify key lessons learned and social factors (“About You”) using Likert scales and open-ended response options. The survey included items from the Oldenburg Burnout questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 17 participants (71%) responded to the survey. Although there was a significant reduction in the mean time spent on in-person clinics (13.5 h/wk [pre-COVID] vs 9.3 h/wk [3 weeks into the COVID emergency response]; P = .002), this was replaced by virtual consults and other COVID-related activities. The proportion of respondents demonstrating features of burnout in the domains of “disengagement” and “exhaustion” was 71% and 64%, respectively. However, there was also evidence of resilience, with 47% respondents “feeling energized.” Top “concerns” and “negative changes” identified related to learning, infection risk and safety, patient care, coping, and concerns about their home country. Top “positive changes” highlighted include work culture, appreciation for leadership caring for the team, the insistence on evidence to guide change, and the implementation of virtual health care. CONCLUSIONS: Negative impact needs to be anticipated, acknowledged, and managed. We anticipate understanding the positives that have emerged under these extraordinary circumstances is the “silver lining” of the pandemic, giving us tools and the best leverage to plan for the future. Elsevier 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7377812/ /pubmed/32838070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.07.004 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Pilar, Avinash
Gravel, Samuel Bergeron
Croke, Jennifer
Soliman, Hany
Chung, Peter
Wong, Rebecca K.S.
Coronavirus Disease 2019’s (COVID-19’s) Silver Lining—Through the Eyes of Radiation Oncology Fellows
title Coronavirus Disease 2019’s (COVID-19’s) Silver Lining—Through the Eyes of Radiation Oncology Fellows
title_full Coronavirus Disease 2019’s (COVID-19’s) Silver Lining—Through the Eyes of Radiation Oncology Fellows
title_fullStr Coronavirus Disease 2019’s (COVID-19’s) Silver Lining—Through the Eyes of Radiation Oncology Fellows
title_full_unstemmed Coronavirus Disease 2019’s (COVID-19’s) Silver Lining—Through the Eyes of Radiation Oncology Fellows
title_short Coronavirus Disease 2019’s (COVID-19’s) Silver Lining—Through the Eyes of Radiation Oncology Fellows
title_sort coronavirus disease 2019’s (covid-19’s) silver lining—through the eyes of radiation oncology fellows
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7377812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32838070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.07.004
work_keys_str_mv AT pilaravinash coronavirusdisease2019scovid19ssilverliningthroughtheeyesofradiationoncologyfellows
AT gravelsamuelbergeron coronavirusdisease2019scovid19ssilverliningthroughtheeyesofradiationoncologyfellows
AT crokejennifer coronavirusdisease2019scovid19ssilverliningthroughtheeyesofradiationoncologyfellows
AT solimanhany coronavirusdisease2019scovid19ssilverliningthroughtheeyesofradiationoncologyfellows
AT chungpeter coronavirusdisease2019scovid19ssilverliningthroughtheeyesofradiationoncologyfellows
AT wongrebeccaks coronavirusdisease2019scovid19ssilverliningthroughtheeyesofradiationoncologyfellows