Cargando…

The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives

PURPOSE: Providing high-quality care for the dying is essential in palliative care. Quality of care can be checked, compared, and improved by assessing responses from bereaved next-of-kin. The objectives of this study are to examine quality of care in the last 2 days of life of hospitalized patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heckel, Maria, Vogt, Annika R., Stiel, Stephanie, Radon, Johannes, Kurkowski, Sandra, Goebel, Swantje, Ostgathe, Christoph, Weber, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32388617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05465-2
_version_ 1783562343510179840
author Heckel, Maria
Vogt, Annika R.
Stiel, Stephanie
Radon, Johannes
Kurkowski, Sandra
Goebel, Swantje
Ostgathe, Christoph
Weber, Martin
author_facet Heckel, Maria
Vogt, Annika R.
Stiel, Stephanie
Radon, Johannes
Kurkowski, Sandra
Goebel, Swantje
Ostgathe, Christoph
Weber, Martin
author_sort Heckel, Maria
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Providing high-quality care for the dying is essential in palliative care. Quality of care can be checked, compared, and improved by assessing responses from bereaved next-of-kin. The objectives of this study are to examine quality of care in the last 2 days of life of hospitalized patients considering specific aspects of their place of care. METHODS: The “Care of the Dying Evaluation” (CODE(™)) questionnaire, validated in German in 2018 (CODE-GER), examines quality of care for the patient and support of next-of-kin, allocating values between 0 (low quality) and 4 (high quality). The total score (0–104) is divided into subscales which indicate support/time given by doctors/nurses, spiritual/emotional support, information/decision-making, environment, information about the dying process, symptoms, and support at the actual time of death/afterwards. Next-of-kin of patients with an expected death in specialized palliative care units and other wards in two university hospitals between April 2016 and March 2017 were included. RESULTS: Most of the 237 analyzed CODE-GER questionnaires were completed by the patient’s spouse (42.6%) or children (40.5%) and 64.1% were female. Patients stayed in hospital for an average of 13.7 days (3–276; SD 21.1). Half of the patients died in a specialized palliative care unit (50.6%). The CODE-GER total score was 85.7 (SD 14.17; 25–104). Subscales were rated significantly better for palliative care units than for other wards. Unsatisfying outcomes were reported in both groups in the subscales for information/decision-making and information about the dying process. CONCLUSION: The overall quality of care for the dying was rated to be good. Improvements of information about the dying process and decision-making are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00013916 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-020-05465-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7378108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73781082020-08-04 The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives Heckel, Maria Vogt, Annika R. Stiel, Stephanie Radon, Johannes Kurkowski, Sandra Goebel, Swantje Ostgathe, Christoph Weber, Martin Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Providing high-quality care for the dying is essential in palliative care. Quality of care can be checked, compared, and improved by assessing responses from bereaved next-of-kin. The objectives of this study are to examine quality of care in the last 2 days of life of hospitalized patients considering specific aspects of their place of care. METHODS: The “Care of the Dying Evaluation” (CODE(™)) questionnaire, validated in German in 2018 (CODE-GER), examines quality of care for the patient and support of next-of-kin, allocating values between 0 (low quality) and 4 (high quality). The total score (0–104) is divided into subscales which indicate support/time given by doctors/nurses, spiritual/emotional support, information/decision-making, environment, information about the dying process, symptoms, and support at the actual time of death/afterwards. Next-of-kin of patients with an expected death in specialized palliative care units and other wards in two university hospitals between April 2016 and March 2017 were included. RESULTS: Most of the 237 analyzed CODE-GER questionnaires were completed by the patient’s spouse (42.6%) or children (40.5%) and 64.1% were female. Patients stayed in hospital for an average of 13.7 days (3–276; SD 21.1). Half of the patients died in a specialized palliative care unit (50.6%). The CODE-GER total score was 85.7 (SD 14.17; 25–104). Subscales were rated significantly better for palliative care units than for other wards. Unsatisfying outcomes were reported in both groups in the subscales for information/decision-making and information about the dying process. CONCLUSION: The overall quality of care for the dying was rated to be good. Improvements of information about the dying process and decision-making are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00013916 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-020-05465-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7378108/ /pubmed/32388617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05465-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Heckel, Maria
Vogt, Annika R.
Stiel, Stephanie
Radon, Johannes
Kurkowski, Sandra
Goebel, Swantje
Ostgathe, Christoph
Weber, Martin
The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives
title The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives
title_full The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives
title_fullStr The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives
title_full_unstemmed The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives
title_short The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives
title_sort quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32388617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05465-2
work_keys_str_mv AT heckelmaria thequalityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives
AT vogtannikar thequalityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives
AT stielstephanie thequalityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives
AT radonjohannes thequalityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives
AT kurkowskisandra thequalityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives
AT goebelswantje thequalityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives
AT ostgathechristoph thequalityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives
AT webermartin thequalityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives
AT heckelmaria qualityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives
AT vogtannikar qualityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives
AT stielstephanie qualityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives
AT radonjohannes qualityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives
AT kurkowskisandra qualityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives
AT goebelswantje qualityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives
AT ostgathechristoph qualityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives
AT webermartin qualityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives