Cargando…
The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives
PURPOSE: Providing high-quality care for the dying is essential in palliative care. Quality of care can be checked, compared, and improved by assessing responses from bereaved next-of-kin. The objectives of this study are to examine quality of care in the last 2 days of life of hospitalized patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32388617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05465-2 |
_version_ | 1783562343510179840 |
---|---|
author | Heckel, Maria Vogt, Annika R. Stiel, Stephanie Radon, Johannes Kurkowski, Sandra Goebel, Swantje Ostgathe, Christoph Weber, Martin |
author_facet | Heckel, Maria Vogt, Annika R. Stiel, Stephanie Radon, Johannes Kurkowski, Sandra Goebel, Swantje Ostgathe, Christoph Weber, Martin |
author_sort | Heckel, Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Providing high-quality care for the dying is essential in palliative care. Quality of care can be checked, compared, and improved by assessing responses from bereaved next-of-kin. The objectives of this study are to examine quality of care in the last 2 days of life of hospitalized patients considering specific aspects of their place of care. METHODS: The “Care of the Dying Evaluation” (CODE(™)) questionnaire, validated in German in 2018 (CODE-GER), examines quality of care for the patient and support of next-of-kin, allocating values between 0 (low quality) and 4 (high quality). The total score (0–104) is divided into subscales which indicate support/time given by doctors/nurses, spiritual/emotional support, information/decision-making, environment, information about the dying process, symptoms, and support at the actual time of death/afterwards. Next-of-kin of patients with an expected death in specialized palliative care units and other wards in two university hospitals between April 2016 and March 2017 were included. RESULTS: Most of the 237 analyzed CODE-GER questionnaires were completed by the patient’s spouse (42.6%) or children (40.5%) and 64.1% were female. Patients stayed in hospital for an average of 13.7 days (3–276; SD 21.1). Half of the patients died in a specialized palliative care unit (50.6%). The CODE-GER total score was 85.7 (SD 14.17; 25–104). Subscales were rated significantly better for palliative care units than for other wards. Unsatisfying outcomes were reported in both groups in the subscales for information/decision-making and information about the dying process. CONCLUSION: The overall quality of care for the dying was rated to be good. Improvements of information about the dying process and decision-making are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00013916 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-020-05465-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7378108 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73781082020-08-04 The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives Heckel, Maria Vogt, Annika R. Stiel, Stephanie Radon, Johannes Kurkowski, Sandra Goebel, Swantje Ostgathe, Christoph Weber, Martin Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Providing high-quality care for the dying is essential in palliative care. Quality of care can be checked, compared, and improved by assessing responses from bereaved next-of-kin. The objectives of this study are to examine quality of care in the last 2 days of life of hospitalized patients considering specific aspects of their place of care. METHODS: The “Care of the Dying Evaluation” (CODE(™)) questionnaire, validated in German in 2018 (CODE-GER), examines quality of care for the patient and support of next-of-kin, allocating values between 0 (low quality) and 4 (high quality). The total score (0–104) is divided into subscales which indicate support/time given by doctors/nurses, spiritual/emotional support, information/decision-making, environment, information about the dying process, symptoms, and support at the actual time of death/afterwards. Next-of-kin of patients with an expected death in specialized palliative care units and other wards in two university hospitals between April 2016 and March 2017 were included. RESULTS: Most of the 237 analyzed CODE-GER questionnaires were completed by the patient’s spouse (42.6%) or children (40.5%) and 64.1% were female. Patients stayed in hospital for an average of 13.7 days (3–276; SD 21.1). Half of the patients died in a specialized palliative care unit (50.6%). The CODE-GER total score was 85.7 (SD 14.17; 25–104). Subscales were rated significantly better for palliative care units than for other wards. Unsatisfying outcomes were reported in both groups in the subscales for information/decision-making and information about the dying process. CONCLUSION: The overall quality of care for the dying was rated to be good. Improvements of information about the dying process and decision-making are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00013916 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-020-05465-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7378108/ /pubmed/32388617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05465-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Heckel, Maria Vogt, Annika R. Stiel, Stephanie Radon, Johannes Kurkowski, Sandra Goebel, Swantje Ostgathe, Christoph Weber, Martin The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives |
title | The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives |
title_full | The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives |
title_fullStr | The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives |
title_short | The quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives |
title_sort | quality of care of the dying in hospital—next-of-kin perspectives |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32388617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05465-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heckelmaria thequalityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives AT vogtannikar thequalityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives AT stielstephanie thequalityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives AT radonjohannes thequalityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives AT kurkowskisandra thequalityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives AT goebelswantje thequalityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives AT ostgathechristoph thequalityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives AT webermartin thequalityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives AT heckelmaria qualityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives AT vogtannikar qualityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives AT stielstephanie qualityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives AT radonjohannes qualityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives AT kurkowskisandra qualityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives AT goebelswantje qualityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives AT ostgathechristoph qualityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives AT webermartin qualityofcareofthedyinginhospitalnextofkinperspectives |