Cargando…

Hemisphere-specific, differential effects of lateralized, occipital–parietal α- versus γ-tACS on endogenous but not exogenous visual-spatial attention

Orienting spatial attention has been associated with interhemispheric asymmetry of power in the α- and γ-band. Specifically, increased α-power has been linked to the inhibition of unattended sensory streams (e.g. the unattended visual field), while increased γ-power is associated with active sensory...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasten, Florian H., Wendeln, Tea, Stecher, Heiko I., Herrmann, Christoph S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32703961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68992-2
_version_ 1783562357763473408
author Kasten, Florian H.
Wendeln, Tea
Stecher, Heiko I.
Herrmann, Christoph S.
author_facet Kasten, Florian H.
Wendeln, Tea
Stecher, Heiko I.
Herrmann, Christoph S.
author_sort Kasten, Florian H.
collection PubMed
description Orienting spatial attention has been associated with interhemispheric asymmetry of power in the α- and γ-band. Specifically, increased α-power has been linked to the inhibition of unattended sensory streams (e.g. the unattended visual field), while increased γ-power is associated with active sensory processing. Here, we aimed to differentially modulate endogenous and exogenous visual-spatial attention using transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). In a single-blind, within-subject design, participants performed several blocks of a spatial cueing task comprised of endogenous and exogenous cues while receiving lateralized α- or γ-tACS or no stimulation over left or right occipital-parietal areas. We found a significant, differential effect of α- and γ-tACS on endogenous (top-down) spatial attention but not on exogenous (bottom-up) attention. The effect was specific to tACS applied to the left hemisphere and driven by a modulation of attentional disengagement and re-orientation as measured during invalid trials. Our results indicate a causal role of α-/γ-oscillations for top-down (endogenous) attention. They may further suggest a left hemispheric dominance in controlling interhemispheric α-/γ-power asymmetry. The absence of an effect on exogenous attention may be indicative of a differential role of α-/γ-oscillations during different attention types or spatially distinct attentional subsystems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7378174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73781742020-07-24 Hemisphere-specific, differential effects of lateralized, occipital–parietal α- versus γ-tACS on endogenous but not exogenous visual-spatial attention Kasten, Florian H. Wendeln, Tea Stecher, Heiko I. Herrmann, Christoph S. Sci Rep Article Orienting spatial attention has been associated with interhemispheric asymmetry of power in the α- and γ-band. Specifically, increased α-power has been linked to the inhibition of unattended sensory streams (e.g. the unattended visual field), while increased γ-power is associated with active sensory processing. Here, we aimed to differentially modulate endogenous and exogenous visual-spatial attention using transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). In a single-blind, within-subject design, participants performed several blocks of a spatial cueing task comprised of endogenous and exogenous cues while receiving lateralized α- or γ-tACS or no stimulation over left or right occipital-parietal areas. We found a significant, differential effect of α- and γ-tACS on endogenous (top-down) spatial attention but not on exogenous (bottom-up) attention. The effect was specific to tACS applied to the left hemisphere and driven by a modulation of attentional disengagement and re-orientation as measured during invalid trials. Our results indicate a causal role of α-/γ-oscillations for top-down (endogenous) attention. They may further suggest a left hemispheric dominance in controlling interhemispheric α-/γ-power asymmetry. The absence of an effect on exogenous attention may be indicative of a differential role of α-/γ-oscillations during different attention types or spatially distinct attentional subsystems. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7378174/ /pubmed/32703961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68992-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kasten, Florian H.
Wendeln, Tea
Stecher, Heiko I.
Herrmann, Christoph S.
Hemisphere-specific, differential effects of lateralized, occipital–parietal α- versus γ-tACS on endogenous but not exogenous visual-spatial attention
title Hemisphere-specific, differential effects of lateralized, occipital–parietal α- versus γ-tACS on endogenous but not exogenous visual-spatial attention
title_full Hemisphere-specific, differential effects of lateralized, occipital–parietal α- versus γ-tACS on endogenous but not exogenous visual-spatial attention
title_fullStr Hemisphere-specific, differential effects of lateralized, occipital–parietal α- versus γ-tACS on endogenous but not exogenous visual-spatial attention
title_full_unstemmed Hemisphere-specific, differential effects of lateralized, occipital–parietal α- versus γ-tACS on endogenous but not exogenous visual-spatial attention
title_short Hemisphere-specific, differential effects of lateralized, occipital–parietal α- versus γ-tACS on endogenous but not exogenous visual-spatial attention
title_sort hemisphere-specific, differential effects of lateralized, occipital–parietal α- versus γ-tacs on endogenous but not exogenous visual-spatial attention
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32703961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68992-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kastenflorianh hemispherespecificdifferentialeffectsoflateralizedoccipitalparietalaversusgtacsonendogenousbutnotexogenousvisualspatialattention
AT wendelntea hemispherespecificdifferentialeffectsoflateralizedoccipitalparietalaversusgtacsonendogenousbutnotexogenousvisualspatialattention
AT stecherheikoi hemispherespecificdifferentialeffectsoflateralizedoccipitalparietalaversusgtacsonendogenousbutnotexogenousvisualspatialattention
AT herrmannchristophs hemispherespecificdifferentialeffectsoflateralizedoccipitalparietalaversusgtacsonendogenousbutnotexogenousvisualspatialattention