Cargando…

Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept

Sepsis is the primary cause of burn-related mortality and morbidity. Traditional indicators of sepsis exhibit poor performance when used in this unique population due to their underlying hypermetabolic and inflammatory response following burn injury. To address this challenge, we developed the Machi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tran, Nam K., Albahra, Samer, Pham, Tam N., Holmes, James H., Greenhalgh, David, Palmieri, Tina L., Wajda, Jeffery, Rashidi, Hooman H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69433-w
_version_ 1783562359455875072
author Tran, Nam K.
Albahra, Samer
Pham, Tam N.
Holmes, James H.
Greenhalgh, David
Palmieri, Tina L.
Wajda, Jeffery
Rashidi, Hooman H.
author_facet Tran, Nam K.
Albahra, Samer
Pham, Tam N.
Holmes, James H.
Greenhalgh, David
Palmieri, Tina L.
Wajda, Jeffery
Rashidi, Hooman H.
author_sort Tran, Nam K.
collection PubMed
description Sepsis is the primary cause of burn-related mortality and morbidity. Traditional indicators of sepsis exhibit poor performance when used in this unique population due to their underlying hypermetabolic and inflammatory response following burn injury. To address this challenge, we developed the Machine Intelligence Learning Optimizer (MILO), an automated machine learning (ML) platform, to automatically produce ML models for predicting burn sepsis. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 211 adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with severe burn injury (≥ 20% total body surface area) to generate training and test datasets for ML applications. The MILO approach was compared against an exhaustive “non-automated” ML approach as well as standard statistical methods. For this study, traditional multivariate logistic regression (LR) identified seven predictors of burn sepsis when controlled for age and burn size (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.99–4.04, P = 0.032). The area under the ROC (ROC-AUC) when using these seven predictors was 0.88. Next, the non-automated ML approach produced an optimal model based on LR using 16 out of the 23 features from the study dataset. Model accuracy was 86% with ROC-AUC of 0.96. In contrast, MILO identified a k-nearest neighbor-based model using only five features to be the best performer with an accuracy of 90% and a ROC-AUC of 0.96. Machine learning augments burn sepsis prediction. MILO identified models more quickly, with less required features, and found to be analytically superior to traditional ML approaches. Future studies are needed to clinically validate the performance of MILO-derived ML models for sepsis prediction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7378181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73781812020-07-24 Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept Tran, Nam K. Albahra, Samer Pham, Tam N. Holmes, James H. Greenhalgh, David Palmieri, Tina L. Wajda, Jeffery Rashidi, Hooman H. Sci Rep Article Sepsis is the primary cause of burn-related mortality and morbidity. Traditional indicators of sepsis exhibit poor performance when used in this unique population due to their underlying hypermetabolic and inflammatory response following burn injury. To address this challenge, we developed the Machine Intelligence Learning Optimizer (MILO), an automated machine learning (ML) platform, to automatically produce ML models for predicting burn sepsis. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 211 adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with severe burn injury (≥ 20% total body surface area) to generate training and test datasets for ML applications. The MILO approach was compared against an exhaustive “non-automated” ML approach as well as standard statistical methods. For this study, traditional multivariate logistic regression (LR) identified seven predictors of burn sepsis when controlled for age and burn size (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.99–4.04, P = 0.032). The area under the ROC (ROC-AUC) when using these seven predictors was 0.88. Next, the non-automated ML approach produced an optimal model based on LR using 16 out of the 23 features from the study dataset. Model accuracy was 86% with ROC-AUC of 0.96. In contrast, MILO identified a k-nearest neighbor-based model using only five features to be the best performer with an accuracy of 90% and a ROC-AUC of 0.96. Machine learning augments burn sepsis prediction. MILO identified models more quickly, with less required features, and found to be analytically superior to traditional ML approaches. Future studies are needed to clinically validate the performance of MILO-derived ML models for sepsis prediction. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7378181/ /pubmed/32704168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69433-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Tran, Nam K.
Albahra, Samer
Pham, Tam N.
Holmes, James H.
Greenhalgh, David
Palmieri, Tina L.
Wajda, Jeffery
Rashidi, Hooman H.
Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept
title Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept
title_full Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept
title_fullStr Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept
title_full_unstemmed Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept
title_short Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept
title_sort novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69433-w
work_keys_str_mv AT trannamk novelapplicationofanautomatedmachinelearningdevelopmenttoolforpredictingburnsepsisproofofconcept
AT albahrasamer novelapplicationofanautomatedmachinelearningdevelopmenttoolforpredictingburnsepsisproofofconcept
AT phamtamn novelapplicationofanautomatedmachinelearningdevelopmenttoolforpredictingburnsepsisproofofconcept
AT holmesjamesh novelapplicationofanautomatedmachinelearningdevelopmenttoolforpredictingburnsepsisproofofconcept
AT greenhalghdavid novelapplicationofanautomatedmachinelearningdevelopmenttoolforpredictingburnsepsisproofofconcept
AT palmieritinal novelapplicationofanautomatedmachinelearningdevelopmenttoolforpredictingburnsepsisproofofconcept
AT wajdajeffery novelapplicationofanautomatedmachinelearningdevelopmenttoolforpredictingburnsepsisproofofconcept
AT rashidihoomanh novelapplicationofanautomatedmachinelearningdevelopmenttoolforpredictingburnsepsisproofofconcept