Cargando…
Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept
Sepsis is the primary cause of burn-related mortality and morbidity. Traditional indicators of sepsis exhibit poor performance when used in this unique population due to their underlying hypermetabolic and inflammatory response following burn injury. To address this challenge, we developed the Machi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69433-w |
_version_ | 1783562359455875072 |
---|---|
author | Tran, Nam K. Albahra, Samer Pham, Tam N. Holmes, James H. Greenhalgh, David Palmieri, Tina L. Wajda, Jeffery Rashidi, Hooman H. |
author_facet | Tran, Nam K. Albahra, Samer Pham, Tam N. Holmes, James H. Greenhalgh, David Palmieri, Tina L. Wajda, Jeffery Rashidi, Hooman H. |
author_sort | Tran, Nam K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sepsis is the primary cause of burn-related mortality and morbidity. Traditional indicators of sepsis exhibit poor performance when used in this unique population due to their underlying hypermetabolic and inflammatory response following burn injury. To address this challenge, we developed the Machine Intelligence Learning Optimizer (MILO), an automated machine learning (ML) platform, to automatically produce ML models for predicting burn sepsis. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 211 adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with severe burn injury (≥ 20% total body surface area) to generate training and test datasets for ML applications. The MILO approach was compared against an exhaustive “non-automated” ML approach as well as standard statistical methods. For this study, traditional multivariate logistic regression (LR) identified seven predictors of burn sepsis when controlled for age and burn size (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.99–4.04, P = 0.032). The area under the ROC (ROC-AUC) when using these seven predictors was 0.88. Next, the non-automated ML approach produced an optimal model based on LR using 16 out of the 23 features from the study dataset. Model accuracy was 86% with ROC-AUC of 0.96. In contrast, MILO identified a k-nearest neighbor-based model using only five features to be the best performer with an accuracy of 90% and a ROC-AUC of 0.96. Machine learning augments burn sepsis prediction. MILO identified models more quickly, with less required features, and found to be analytically superior to traditional ML approaches. Future studies are needed to clinically validate the performance of MILO-derived ML models for sepsis prediction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7378181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73781812020-07-24 Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept Tran, Nam K. Albahra, Samer Pham, Tam N. Holmes, James H. Greenhalgh, David Palmieri, Tina L. Wajda, Jeffery Rashidi, Hooman H. Sci Rep Article Sepsis is the primary cause of burn-related mortality and morbidity. Traditional indicators of sepsis exhibit poor performance when used in this unique population due to their underlying hypermetabolic and inflammatory response following burn injury. To address this challenge, we developed the Machine Intelligence Learning Optimizer (MILO), an automated machine learning (ML) platform, to automatically produce ML models for predicting burn sepsis. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 211 adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with severe burn injury (≥ 20% total body surface area) to generate training and test datasets for ML applications. The MILO approach was compared against an exhaustive “non-automated” ML approach as well as standard statistical methods. For this study, traditional multivariate logistic regression (LR) identified seven predictors of burn sepsis when controlled for age and burn size (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.99–4.04, P = 0.032). The area under the ROC (ROC-AUC) when using these seven predictors was 0.88. Next, the non-automated ML approach produced an optimal model based on LR using 16 out of the 23 features from the study dataset. Model accuracy was 86% with ROC-AUC of 0.96. In contrast, MILO identified a k-nearest neighbor-based model using only five features to be the best performer with an accuracy of 90% and a ROC-AUC of 0.96. Machine learning augments burn sepsis prediction. MILO identified models more quickly, with less required features, and found to be analytically superior to traditional ML approaches. Future studies are needed to clinically validate the performance of MILO-derived ML models for sepsis prediction. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7378181/ /pubmed/32704168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69433-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Tran, Nam K. Albahra, Samer Pham, Tam N. Holmes, James H. Greenhalgh, David Palmieri, Tina L. Wajda, Jeffery Rashidi, Hooman H. Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept |
title | Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept |
title_full | Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept |
title_fullStr | Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept |
title_full_unstemmed | Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept |
title_short | Novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept |
title_sort | novel application of an automated-machine learning development tool for predicting burn sepsis: proof of concept |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69433-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trannamk novelapplicationofanautomatedmachinelearningdevelopmenttoolforpredictingburnsepsisproofofconcept AT albahrasamer novelapplicationofanautomatedmachinelearningdevelopmenttoolforpredictingburnsepsisproofofconcept AT phamtamn novelapplicationofanautomatedmachinelearningdevelopmenttoolforpredictingburnsepsisproofofconcept AT holmesjamesh novelapplicationofanautomatedmachinelearningdevelopmenttoolforpredictingburnsepsisproofofconcept AT greenhalghdavid novelapplicationofanautomatedmachinelearningdevelopmenttoolforpredictingburnsepsisproofofconcept AT palmieritinal novelapplicationofanautomatedmachinelearningdevelopmenttoolforpredictingburnsepsisproofofconcept AT wajdajeffery novelapplicationofanautomatedmachinelearningdevelopmenttoolforpredictingburnsepsisproofofconcept AT rashidihoomanh novelapplicationofanautomatedmachinelearningdevelopmenttoolforpredictingburnsepsisproofofconcept |