Cargando…
Effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait
People with amputation may perceive phantom limb sensations or pain in the amputated body part when ipsilateral body-regions are stimulated. These body-regions are called receptive fields. This study assessed whether receptive fields change in size and position over the course of one month in people...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32715148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibror.2020.06.008 |
_version_ | 1783562379520376832 |
---|---|
author | Pleus, Michael Koller, Thomas Tschui, Felix Grögli, Marion Spengler, Christina M. |
author_facet | Pleus, Michael Koller, Thomas Tschui, Felix Grögli, Marion Spengler, Christina M. |
author_sort | Pleus, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | People with amputation may perceive phantom limb sensations or pain in the amputated body part when ipsilateral body-regions are stimulated. These body-regions are called receptive fields. This study assessed whether receptive fields change in size and position over the course of one month in people with trans-tibial amputation and whether electrical stimulation of these fields in synchrony with walking affects phantom sensations and variables of gait. Thirty-one subjects participated in this study. Receptive fields were mapped seven times over a one month period. Thereafter, the effect of electrical stimulation in synchrony with walking was compared to placebo stimulation in an acute setting with a randomized, single-blind gait analysis in 18 participants. Results showed that receptive field size and position presented an adequate degree of consistency (difference in point of first response position of 4.9 ± 4.8 cm and overlap of total receptive field area of 54.3 ± 35.0 %) for future use of electrical stimulation. Gait parameters for everyday activities (speed, gait width, % stance and swing phase) as well as perception of phantom pain were not altered to a clinically relevant degree by electrical stimulation and no negative effects were reported. In conclusion: Location and size of receptive fields are consistent enough for daily electrical stimulation without laborious daily assessment. If applied acutely, no significant effect on gait or pain could be detected. However, results are promising enough to test chronic application of electrical stimulation during gait in a long-term setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7378268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73782682020-07-24 Effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait Pleus, Michael Koller, Thomas Tschui, Felix Grögli, Marion Spengler, Christina M. IBRO Rep Article People with amputation may perceive phantom limb sensations or pain in the amputated body part when ipsilateral body-regions are stimulated. These body-regions are called receptive fields. This study assessed whether receptive fields change in size and position over the course of one month in people with trans-tibial amputation and whether electrical stimulation of these fields in synchrony with walking affects phantom sensations and variables of gait. Thirty-one subjects participated in this study. Receptive fields were mapped seven times over a one month period. Thereafter, the effect of electrical stimulation in synchrony with walking was compared to placebo stimulation in an acute setting with a randomized, single-blind gait analysis in 18 participants. Results showed that receptive field size and position presented an adequate degree of consistency (difference in point of first response position of 4.9 ± 4.8 cm and overlap of total receptive field area of 54.3 ± 35.0 %) for future use of electrical stimulation. Gait parameters for everyday activities (speed, gait width, % stance and swing phase) as well as perception of phantom pain were not altered to a clinically relevant degree by electrical stimulation and no negative effects were reported. In conclusion: Location and size of receptive fields are consistent enough for daily electrical stimulation without laborious daily assessment. If applied acutely, no significant effect on gait or pain could be detected. However, results are promising enough to test chronic application of electrical stimulation during gait in a long-term setting. Elsevier 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7378268/ /pubmed/32715148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibror.2020.06.008 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pleus, Michael Koller, Thomas Tschui, Felix Grögli, Marion Spengler, Christina M. Effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait |
title | Effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait |
title_full | Effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait |
title_fullStr | Effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait |
title_short | Effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait |
title_sort | effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32715148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibror.2020.06.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pleusmichael effectofelectricalstimulationofreceptivefieldsinpeoplewithlowerlimbamputationonvariablesofgait AT kollerthomas effectofelectricalstimulationofreceptivefieldsinpeoplewithlowerlimbamputationonvariablesofgait AT tschuifelix effectofelectricalstimulationofreceptivefieldsinpeoplewithlowerlimbamputationonvariablesofgait AT groglimarion effectofelectricalstimulationofreceptivefieldsinpeoplewithlowerlimbamputationonvariablesofgait AT spenglerchristinam effectofelectricalstimulationofreceptivefieldsinpeoplewithlowerlimbamputationonvariablesofgait |