Cargando…

Effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait

People with amputation may perceive phantom limb sensations or pain in the amputated body part when ipsilateral body-regions are stimulated. These body-regions are called receptive fields. This study assessed whether receptive fields change in size and position over the course of one month in people...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pleus, Michael, Koller, Thomas, Tschui, Felix, Grögli, Marion, Spengler, Christina M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32715148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibror.2020.06.008
_version_ 1783562379520376832
author Pleus, Michael
Koller, Thomas
Tschui, Felix
Grögli, Marion
Spengler, Christina M.
author_facet Pleus, Michael
Koller, Thomas
Tschui, Felix
Grögli, Marion
Spengler, Christina M.
author_sort Pleus, Michael
collection PubMed
description People with amputation may perceive phantom limb sensations or pain in the amputated body part when ipsilateral body-regions are stimulated. These body-regions are called receptive fields. This study assessed whether receptive fields change in size and position over the course of one month in people with trans-tibial amputation and whether electrical stimulation of these fields in synchrony with walking affects phantom sensations and variables of gait. Thirty-one subjects participated in this study. Receptive fields were mapped seven times over a one month period. Thereafter, the effect of electrical stimulation in synchrony with walking was compared to placebo stimulation in an acute setting with a randomized, single-blind gait analysis in 18 participants. Results showed that receptive field size and position presented an adequate degree of consistency (difference in point of first response position of 4.9 ± 4.8 cm and overlap of total receptive field area of 54.3 ± 35.0 %) for future use of electrical stimulation. Gait parameters for everyday activities (speed, gait width, % stance and swing phase) as well as perception of phantom pain were not altered to a clinically relevant degree by electrical stimulation and no negative effects were reported. In conclusion: Location and size of receptive fields are consistent enough for daily electrical stimulation without laborious daily assessment. If applied acutely, no significant effect on gait or pain could be detected. However, results are promising enough to test chronic application of electrical stimulation during gait in a long-term setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7378268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73782682020-07-24 Effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait Pleus, Michael Koller, Thomas Tschui, Felix Grögli, Marion Spengler, Christina M. IBRO Rep Article People with amputation may perceive phantom limb sensations or pain in the amputated body part when ipsilateral body-regions are stimulated. These body-regions are called receptive fields. This study assessed whether receptive fields change in size and position over the course of one month in people with trans-tibial amputation and whether electrical stimulation of these fields in synchrony with walking affects phantom sensations and variables of gait. Thirty-one subjects participated in this study. Receptive fields were mapped seven times over a one month period. Thereafter, the effect of electrical stimulation in synchrony with walking was compared to placebo stimulation in an acute setting with a randomized, single-blind gait analysis in 18 participants. Results showed that receptive field size and position presented an adequate degree of consistency (difference in point of first response position of 4.9 ± 4.8 cm and overlap of total receptive field area of 54.3 ± 35.0 %) for future use of electrical stimulation. Gait parameters for everyday activities (speed, gait width, % stance and swing phase) as well as perception of phantom pain were not altered to a clinically relevant degree by electrical stimulation and no negative effects were reported. In conclusion: Location and size of receptive fields are consistent enough for daily electrical stimulation without laborious daily assessment. If applied acutely, no significant effect on gait or pain could be detected. However, results are promising enough to test chronic application of electrical stimulation during gait in a long-term setting. Elsevier 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7378268/ /pubmed/32715148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibror.2020.06.008 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pleus, Michael
Koller, Thomas
Tschui, Felix
Grögli, Marion
Spengler, Christina M.
Effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait
title Effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait
title_full Effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait
title_fullStr Effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait
title_full_unstemmed Effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait
title_short Effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait
title_sort effect of electrical stimulation of receptive fields in people with lower limb amputation on variables of gait
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32715148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibror.2020.06.008
work_keys_str_mv AT pleusmichael effectofelectricalstimulationofreceptivefieldsinpeoplewithlowerlimbamputationonvariablesofgait
AT kollerthomas effectofelectricalstimulationofreceptivefieldsinpeoplewithlowerlimbamputationonvariablesofgait
AT tschuifelix effectofelectricalstimulationofreceptivefieldsinpeoplewithlowerlimbamputationonvariablesofgait
AT groglimarion effectofelectricalstimulationofreceptivefieldsinpeoplewithlowerlimbamputationonvariablesofgait
AT spenglerchristinam effectofelectricalstimulationofreceptivefieldsinpeoplewithlowerlimbamputationonvariablesofgait