Cargando…
Mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and treatment
Mesh was a promising, minimally invasive, and ‘gold standard’ treatment for urinary stress incontinence. Time has shown that complications from these devices can happen early, or even several years, after mesh placement and can be catastrophic. Pain, erosion, voiding dysfunction, infection, recurren...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32754226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756287220942993 |
_version_ | 1783562482367856640 |
---|---|
author | Bueno Garcia Reyes, Paulina Hashim, Hashim |
author_facet | Bueno Garcia Reyes, Paulina Hashim, Hashim |
author_sort | Bueno Garcia Reyes, Paulina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mesh was a promising, minimally invasive, and ‘gold standard’ treatment for urinary stress incontinence. Time has shown that complications from these devices can happen early, or even several years, after mesh placement and can be catastrophic. Pain, erosion, voiding dysfunction, infection, recurrent UTIs [urinary tract infections (UTIs)], fistulae, organ perforation, bleeding, vaginal scarring, neuromuscular alterations, LUTS (lower urinary tract symptoms), bowel complications and even immune disorders have been linked to mesh. Various tools, such as imaging, endoscopic and functional studies, are available for diagnosis of mesh complications. Since the spectrum of complications is wide, involvement of other specialties is usually beneficial in the diagnosis and management of these complications. There is still much to learn on the accuracy and utility of diagnostic studies in each type of complication. Evidence on the best diagnostic and treatment pathways for these complications is scarce but continuously growing as information is being reported, and we continue to gain expertise in dealing with patients affected by mesh. Treatment options include conservative and medical management initially and then open or minimally invasive surgical procedure approaches. This article will describe diagnostic and treatment pathways for mesh complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7378717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73787172020-08-03 Mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and treatment Bueno Garcia Reyes, Paulina Hashim, Hashim Ther Adv Urol Review Mesh was a promising, minimally invasive, and ‘gold standard’ treatment for urinary stress incontinence. Time has shown that complications from these devices can happen early, or even several years, after mesh placement and can be catastrophic. Pain, erosion, voiding dysfunction, infection, recurrent UTIs [urinary tract infections (UTIs)], fistulae, organ perforation, bleeding, vaginal scarring, neuromuscular alterations, LUTS (lower urinary tract symptoms), bowel complications and even immune disorders have been linked to mesh. Various tools, such as imaging, endoscopic and functional studies, are available for diagnosis of mesh complications. Since the spectrum of complications is wide, involvement of other specialties is usually beneficial in the diagnosis and management of these complications. There is still much to learn on the accuracy and utility of diagnostic studies in each type of complication. Evidence on the best diagnostic and treatment pathways for these complications is scarce but continuously growing as information is being reported, and we continue to gain expertise in dealing with patients affected by mesh. Treatment options include conservative and medical management initially and then open or minimally invasive surgical procedure approaches. This article will describe diagnostic and treatment pathways for mesh complications. SAGE Publications 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7378717/ /pubmed/32754226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756287220942993 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Bueno Garcia Reyes, Paulina Hashim, Hashim Mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and treatment |
title | Mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and
treatment |
title_full | Mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and
treatment |
title_fullStr | Mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and
treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and
treatment |
title_short | Mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and
treatment |
title_sort | mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and
treatment |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32754226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756287220942993 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buenogarciareyespaulina meshcomplicationsbestpracticeindiagnosisandtreatment AT hashimhashim meshcomplicationsbestpracticeindiagnosisandtreatment |