Cargando…

Mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and treatment

Mesh was a promising, minimally invasive, and ‘gold standard’ treatment for urinary stress incontinence. Time has shown that complications from these devices can happen early, or even several years, after mesh placement and can be catastrophic. Pain, erosion, voiding dysfunction, infection, recurren...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bueno Garcia Reyes, Paulina, Hashim, Hashim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32754226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756287220942993
_version_ 1783562482367856640
author Bueno Garcia Reyes, Paulina
Hashim, Hashim
author_facet Bueno Garcia Reyes, Paulina
Hashim, Hashim
author_sort Bueno Garcia Reyes, Paulina
collection PubMed
description Mesh was a promising, minimally invasive, and ‘gold standard’ treatment for urinary stress incontinence. Time has shown that complications from these devices can happen early, or even several years, after mesh placement and can be catastrophic. Pain, erosion, voiding dysfunction, infection, recurrent UTIs [urinary tract infections (UTIs)], fistulae, organ perforation, bleeding, vaginal scarring, neuromuscular alterations, LUTS (lower urinary tract symptoms), bowel complications and even immune disorders have been linked to mesh. Various tools, such as imaging, endoscopic and functional studies, are available for diagnosis of mesh complications. Since the spectrum of complications is wide, involvement of other specialties is usually beneficial in the diagnosis and management of these complications. There is still much to learn on the accuracy and utility of diagnostic studies in each type of complication. Evidence on the best diagnostic and treatment pathways for these complications is scarce but continuously growing as information is being reported, and we continue to gain expertise in dealing with patients affected by mesh. Treatment options include conservative and medical management initially and then open or minimally invasive surgical procedure approaches. This article will describe diagnostic and treatment pathways for mesh complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7378717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73787172020-08-03 Mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and treatment Bueno Garcia Reyes, Paulina Hashim, Hashim Ther Adv Urol Review Mesh was a promising, minimally invasive, and ‘gold standard’ treatment for urinary stress incontinence. Time has shown that complications from these devices can happen early, or even several years, after mesh placement and can be catastrophic. Pain, erosion, voiding dysfunction, infection, recurrent UTIs [urinary tract infections (UTIs)], fistulae, organ perforation, bleeding, vaginal scarring, neuromuscular alterations, LUTS (lower urinary tract symptoms), bowel complications and even immune disorders have been linked to mesh. Various tools, such as imaging, endoscopic and functional studies, are available for diagnosis of mesh complications. Since the spectrum of complications is wide, involvement of other specialties is usually beneficial in the diagnosis and management of these complications. There is still much to learn on the accuracy and utility of diagnostic studies in each type of complication. Evidence on the best diagnostic and treatment pathways for these complications is scarce but continuously growing as information is being reported, and we continue to gain expertise in dealing with patients affected by mesh. Treatment options include conservative and medical management initially and then open or minimally invasive surgical procedure approaches. This article will describe diagnostic and treatment pathways for mesh complications. SAGE Publications 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7378717/ /pubmed/32754226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756287220942993 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Bueno Garcia Reyes, Paulina
Hashim, Hashim
Mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and treatment
title Mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and treatment
title_full Mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and treatment
title_fullStr Mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and treatment
title_full_unstemmed Mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and treatment
title_short Mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and treatment
title_sort mesh complications: best practice in diagnosis and treatment
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32754226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756287220942993
work_keys_str_mv AT buenogarciareyespaulina meshcomplicationsbestpracticeindiagnosisandtreatment
AT hashimhashim meshcomplicationsbestpracticeindiagnosisandtreatment