Cargando…
N(6)‐methyladenosine and RNA secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in Arabidopsis
After transcription, a messenger RNA (mRNA) is further post‐transcriptionally regulated by several features including RNA secondary structure and covalent RNA modifications (specifically N(6)‐methyladenosine, m(6)A). Both RNA secondary structure and m(6)A have been demonstrated to regulate mRNA stab...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32724893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pld3.239 |
_version_ | 1783562549049950208 |
---|---|
author | Kramer, Marianne C. Janssen, Kevin A. Palos, Kyle Nelson, Andrew D. L. Vandivier, Lee E. Garcia, Benjamin A. Lyons, Eric Beilstein, Mark A. Gregory, Brian D. |
author_facet | Kramer, Marianne C. Janssen, Kevin A. Palos, Kyle Nelson, Andrew D. L. Vandivier, Lee E. Garcia, Benjamin A. Lyons, Eric Beilstein, Mark A. Gregory, Brian D. |
author_sort | Kramer, Marianne C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | After transcription, a messenger RNA (mRNA) is further post‐transcriptionally regulated by several features including RNA secondary structure and covalent RNA modifications (specifically N(6)‐methyladenosine, m(6)A). Both RNA secondary structure and m(6)A have been demonstrated to regulate mRNA stability and translation and have been independently linked to plant responses to soil salinity levels. However, the effect of m(6)A on regulating RNA secondary structure and the combinatorial interplay between these two RNA features during salt stress response has yet to be studied. Here, we globally identify RNA‐protein interactions and RNA secondary structure during systemic salt stress. This analysis reveals that RNA secondary structure changes significantly during salt stress, and that it is independent of global changes in RNA‐protein interactions. Conversely, we find that m(6)A is anti‐correlated with RNA secondary structure in a condition‐dependent manner, with salt‐specific m(6)A correlated with a decrease in mRNA secondary structure during salt stress. Taken together, we suggest that salt‐specific m(6)A deposition and the associated loss of RNA secondary structure results in increases in mRNA stability for transcripts encoding abiotic stress response proteins and ultimately increases in protein levels from these stabilized transcripts. In total, our comprehensive analyses reveal important post‐transcriptional regulatory mechanisms involved in plant long‐term salt stress response and adaptation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7379018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73790182020-07-27 N(6)‐methyladenosine and RNA secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in Arabidopsis Kramer, Marianne C. Janssen, Kevin A. Palos, Kyle Nelson, Andrew D. L. Vandivier, Lee E. Garcia, Benjamin A. Lyons, Eric Beilstein, Mark A. Gregory, Brian D. Plant Direct Original Research After transcription, a messenger RNA (mRNA) is further post‐transcriptionally regulated by several features including RNA secondary structure and covalent RNA modifications (specifically N(6)‐methyladenosine, m(6)A). Both RNA secondary structure and m(6)A have been demonstrated to regulate mRNA stability and translation and have been independently linked to plant responses to soil salinity levels. However, the effect of m(6)A on regulating RNA secondary structure and the combinatorial interplay between these two RNA features during salt stress response has yet to be studied. Here, we globally identify RNA‐protein interactions and RNA secondary structure during systemic salt stress. This analysis reveals that RNA secondary structure changes significantly during salt stress, and that it is independent of global changes in RNA‐protein interactions. Conversely, we find that m(6)A is anti‐correlated with RNA secondary structure in a condition‐dependent manner, with salt‐specific m(6)A correlated with a decrease in mRNA secondary structure during salt stress. Taken together, we suggest that salt‐specific m(6)A deposition and the associated loss of RNA secondary structure results in increases in mRNA stability for transcripts encoding abiotic stress response proteins and ultimately increases in protein levels from these stabilized transcripts. In total, our comprehensive analyses reveal important post‐transcriptional regulatory mechanisms involved in plant long‐term salt stress response and adaptation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7379018/ /pubmed/32724893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pld3.239 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Plant Direct published by American Society of Plant Biologists, Society for Experimental Biology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kramer, Marianne C. Janssen, Kevin A. Palos, Kyle Nelson, Andrew D. L. Vandivier, Lee E. Garcia, Benjamin A. Lyons, Eric Beilstein, Mark A. Gregory, Brian D. N(6)‐methyladenosine and RNA secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in Arabidopsis |
title | N(6)‐methyladenosine and RNA secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in Arabidopsis |
title_full | N(6)‐methyladenosine and RNA secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in Arabidopsis |
title_fullStr | N(6)‐methyladenosine and RNA secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in Arabidopsis |
title_full_unstemmed | N(6)‐methyladenosine and RNA secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in Arabidopsis |
title_short | N(6)‐methyladenosine and RNA secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in Arabidopsis |
title_sort | n(6)‐methyladenosine and rna secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in arabidopsis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32724893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pld3.239 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kramermariannec n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis AT janssenkevina n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis AT paloskyle n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis AT nelsonandrewdl n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis AT vandivierleee n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis AT garciabenjamina n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis AT lyonseric n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis AT beilsteinmarka n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis AT gregorybriand n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis |