Cargando…

N(6)‐methyladenosine and RNA secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in Arabidopsis

After transcription, a messenger RNA (mRNA) is further post‐transcriptionally regulated by several features including RNA secondary structure and covalent RNA modifications (specifically N(6)‐methyladenosine, m(6)A). Both RNA secondary structure and m(6)A have been demonstrated to regulate mRNA stab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kramer, Marianne C., Janssen, Kevin A., Palos, Kyle, Nelson, Andrew D. L., Vandivier, Lee E., Garcia, Benjamin A., Lyons, Eric, Beilstein, Mark A., Gregory, Brian D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32724893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pld3.239
_version_ 1783562549049950208
author Kramer, Marianne C.
Janssen, Kevin A.
Palos, Kyle
Nelson, Andrew D. L.
Vandivier, Lee E.
Garcia, Benjamin A.
Lyons, Eric
Beilstein, Mark A.
Gregory, Brian D.
author_facet Kramer, Marianne C.
Janssen, Kevin A.
Palos, Kyle
Nelson, Andrew D. L.
Vandivier, Lee E.
Garcia, Benjamin A.
Lyons, Eric
Beilstein, Mark A.
Gregory, Brian D.
author_sort Kramer, Marianne C.
collection PubMed
description After transcription, a messenger RNA (mRNA) is further post‐transcriptionally regulated by several features including RNA secondary structure and covalent RNA modifications (specifically N(6)‐methyladenosine, m(6)A). Both RNA secondary structure and m(6)A have been demonstrated to regulate mRNA stability and translation and have been independently linked to plant responses to soil salinity levels. However, the effect of m(6)A on regulating RNA secondary structure and the combinatorial interplay between these two RNA features during salt stress response has yet to be studied. Here, we globally identify RNA‐protein interactions and RNA secondary structure during systemic salt stress. This analysis reveals that RNA secondary structure changes significantly during salt stress, and that it is independent of global changes in RNA‐protein interactions. Conversely, we find that m(6)A is anti‐correlated with RNA secondary structure in a condition‐dependent manner, with salt‐specific m(6)A correlated with a decrease in mRNA secondary structure during salt stress. Taken together, we suggest that salt‐specific m(6)A deposition and the associated loss of RNA secondary structure results in increases in mRNA stability for transcripts encoding abiotic stress response proteins and ultimately increases in protein levels from these stabilized transcripts. In total, our comprehensive analyses reveal important post‐transcriptional regulatory mechanisms involved in plant long‐term salt stress response and adaptation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7379018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73790182020-07-27 N(6)‐methyladenosine and RNA secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in Arabidopsis Kramer, Marianne C. Janssen, Kevin A. Palos, Kyle Nelson, Andrew D. L. Vandivier, Lee E. Garcia, Benjamin A. Lyons, Eric Beilstein, Mark A. Gregory, Brian D. Plant Direct Original Research After transcription, a messenger RNA (mRNA) is further post‐transcriptionally regulated by several features including RNA secondary structure and covalent RNA modifications (specifically N(6)‐methyladenosine, m(6)A). Both RNA secondary structure and m(6)A have been demonstrated to regulate mRNA stability and translation and have been independently linked to plant responses to soil salinity levels. However, the effect of m(6)A on regulating RNA secondary structure and the combinatorial interplay between these two RNA features during salt stress response has yet to be studied. Here, we globally identify RNA‐protein interactions and RNA secondary structure during systemic salt stress. This analysis reveals that RNA secondary structure changes significantly during salt stress, and that it is independent of global changes in RNA‐protein interactions. Conversely, we find that m(6)A is anti‐correlated with RNA secondary structure in a condition‐dependent manner, with salt‐specific m(6)A correlated with a decrease in mRNA secondary structure during salt stress. Taken together, we suggest that salt‐specific m(6)A deposition and the associated loss of RNA secondary structure results in increases in mRNA stability for transcripts encoding abiotic stress response proteins and ultimately increases in protein levels from these stabilized transcripts. In total, our comprehensive analyses reveal important post‐transcriptional regulatory mechanisms involved in plant long‐term salt stress response and adaptation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7379018/ /pubmed/32724893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pld3.239 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Plant Direct published by American Society of Plant Biologists, Society for Experimental Biology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kramer, Marianne C.
Janssen, Kevin A.
Palos, Kyle
Nelson, Andrew D. L.
Vandivier, Lee E.
Garcia, Benjamin A.
Lyons, Eric
Beilstein, Mark A.
Gregory, Brian D.
N(6)‐methyladenosine and RNA secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in Arabidopsis
title N(6)‐methyladenosine and RNA secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in Arabidopsis
title_full N(6)‐methyladenosine and RNA secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in Arabidopsis
title_fullStr N(6)‐methyladenosine and RNA secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in Arabidopsis
title_full_unstemmed N(6)‐methyladenosine and RNA secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in Arabidopsis
title_short N(6)‐methyladenosine and RNA secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in Arabidopsis
title_sort n(6)‐methyladenosine and rna secondary structure affect transcript stability and protein abundance during systemic salt stress in arabidopsis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32724893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pld3.239
work_keys_str_mv AT kramermariannec n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis
AT janssenkevina n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis
AT paloskyle n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis
AT nelsonandrewdl n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis
AT vandivierleee n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis
AT garciabenjamina n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis
AT lyonseric n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis
AT beilsteinmarka n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis
AT gregorybriand n6methyladenosineandrnasecondarystructureaffecttranscriptstabilityandproteinabundanceduringsystemicsaltstressinarabidopsis