Cargando…
Retrospective study of the diagnostic utility of Spec fPLin the assessment of 274 sick cats
BACKGROUND: Serum feline pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity (fPL) commonly is used in the assessment of sick cats suspected to have pancreatitis but its diagnostic utility is debated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of the Spec fPL test and selected serum biochemistry tests in the dia...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32452547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15797 |
_version_ | 1783562551685021696 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Cherrie Kathrani, Aarti Maddison, Jill |
author_facet | Lee, Cherrie Kathrani, Aarti Maddison, Jill |
author_sort | Lee, Cherrie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Serum feline pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity (fPL) commonly is used in the assessment of sick cats suspected to have pancreatitis but its diagnostic utility is debated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of the Spec fPL test and selected serum biochemistry tests in the diagnosis of pancreatitis in cats. ANIMALS: Two hundred seventy‐four client‐owned cats presented to a university teaching hospital in the United Kingdom, from April 2013 to May 2017, in which Spec fPL was measured. METHODS: Cats were classified into 1 of 4 groups based on clinical signs (all cats), ultrasonographic findings (all cats) and histopathological or cytological assessment of the pancreas where available (9 cats) regardless of Spec fPL concentration. The groups were (a) definite pancreatitis (n = 9), (b) probable pancreatitis (n = 49), (c) possible pancreatitis (n = 139), and (d) unlikely pancreatitis (n = 77). Spec fPL and selected serum biochemistry test results were compared among groups. RESULTS: Serum fPL concentrations >5.3 μg/L were classified as positive and concentrations <3.5 μg/L were classified as negative. There was a significantly (P = .03) lower proportion of false‐positive results (cats unlikely to have pancreatitis, n = 77, with a positive fPL, n = 8, 10%) than false‐negative results (cats with definite or probable pancreatitis, n = 58, with a negative fPL result, n = 14, 24%). None of the selected biochemical tests were helpful diagnostically. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: A positive Spec fPL result indicates that pancreatitis is a probable diagnosis, but the test cannot be used to rule the diagnosis out. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7379029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73790292020-07-27 Retrospective study of the diagnostic utility of Spec fPLin the assessment of 274 sick cats Lee, Cherrie Kathrani, Aarti Maddison, Jill J Vet Intern Med SMALL ANIMAL BACKGROUND: Serum feline pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity (fPL) commonly is used in the assessment of sick cats suspected to have pancreatitis but its diagnostic utility is debated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of the Spec fPL test and selected serum biochemistry tests in the diagnosis of pancreatitis in cats. ANIMALS: Two hundred seventy‐four client‐owned cats presented to a university teaching hospital in the United Kingdom, from April 2013 to May 2017, in which Spec fPL was measured. METHODS: Cats were classified into 1 of 4 groups based on clinical signs (all cats), ultrasonographic findings (all cats) and histopathological or cytological assessment of the pancreas where available (9 cats) regardless of Spec fPL concentration. The groups were (a) definite pancreatitis (n = 9), (b) probable pancreatitis (n = 49), (c) possible pancreatitis (n = 139), and (d) unlikely pancreatitis (n = 77). Spec fPL and selected serum biochemistry test results were compared among groups. RESULTS: Serum fPL concentrations >5.3 μg/L were classified as positive and concentrations <3.5 μg/L were classified as negative. There was a significantly (P = .03) lower proportion of false‐positive results (cats unlikely to have pancreatitis, n = 77, with a positive fPL, n = 8, 10%) than false‐negative results (cats with definite or probable pancreatitis, n = 58, with a negative fPL result, n = 14, 24%). None of the selected biochemical tests were helpful diagnostically. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: A positive Spec fPL result indicates that pancreatitis is a probable diagnosis, but the test cannot be used to rule the diagnosis out. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-05-26 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7379029/ /pubmed/32452547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15797 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | SMALL ANIMAL Lee, Cherrie Kathrani, Aarti Maddison, Jill Retrospective study of the diagnostic utility of Spec fPLin the assessment of 274 sick cats |
title | Retrospective study of the diagnostic utility of Spec fPLin the assessment of 274 sick cats |
title_full | Retrospective study of the diagnostic utility of Spec fPLin the assessment of 274 sick cats |
title_fullStr | Retrospective study of the diagnostic utility of Spec fPLin the assessment of 274 sick cats |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective study of the diagnostic utility of Spec fPLin the assessment of 274 sick cats |
title_short | Retrospective study of the diagnostic utility of Spec fPLin the assessment of 274 sick cats |
title_sort | retrospective study of the diagnostic utility of spec fplin the assessment of 274 sick cats |
topic | SMALL ANIMAL |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32452547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15797 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leecherrie retrospectivestudyofthediagnosticutilityofspecfplintheassessmentof274sickcats AT kathraniaarti retrospectivestudyofthediagnosticutilityofspecfplintheassessmentof274sickcats AT maddisonjill retrospectivestudyofthediagnosticutilityofspecfplintheassessmentof274sickcats |