Cargando…

Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings

OBJECTIVE: To determine acceptable and achievable strategies of intrapartum fetal monitoring in busy low‐resource settings. METHODS: Three rounds of online Delphi surveys were conducted between January 1 and October 31, 2017. International experts with experience in low‐resource settings scored the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Housseine, Natasha, Punt, Marieke C., Browne, Joyce L., van ‘t Hooft, Janneke, Maaløe, Nanna, Meguid, Tarek, Theron, Gerhard B., Franx, Arie, Grobbee, Diederick E., Visser, Gerard H.A., Rijken, Marcus J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30582153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12724
_version_ 1783562597394546688
author Housseine, Natasha
Punt, Marieke C.
Browne, Joyce L.
van ‘t Hooft, Janneke
Maaløe, Nanna
Meguid, Tarek
Theron, Gerhard B.
Franx, Arie
Grobbee, Diederick E.
Visser, Gerard H.A.
Rijken, Marcus J.
author_facet Housseine, Natasha
Punt, Marieke C.
Browne, Joyce L.
van ‘t Hooft, Janneke
Maaløe, Nanna
Meguid, Tarek
Theron, Gerhard B.
Franx, Arie
Grobbee, Diederick E.
Visser, Gerard H.A.
Rijken, Marcus J.
author_sort Housseine, Natasha
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine acceptable and achievable strategies of intrapartum fetal monitoring in busy low‐resource settings. METHODS: Three rounds of online Delphi surveys were conducted between January 1 and October 31, 2017. International experts with experience in low‐resource settings scored the importance of intrapartum fetal monitoring methods. RESULTS: 71 experts completed all three rounds (28 midwives, 43 obstetricians). Consensus was reached on (1) need for an admission test, (2) handheld Doppler for intrapartum fetal monitoring, (3) intermittent auscultation (IA) every 30 minutes for low‐risk pregnancies during the first stage of labor and after every contraction for high‐risk pregnancies in the second stage, (4) contraction monitoring hourly for low‐risk pregnancies in the first stage, and (5) adjunctive tests. Consensus was not reached on frequency of IA or contraction monitoring for high‐risk women in the first stage or low‐risk women in the second stage of labor. CONCLUSION: There is a gap between international recommendations and what is physically possible in many labor wards in low‐resource settings. Research on how to effectively implement the consensus on fetal assessment at admission and use of handheld Doppler during labor and delivery is crucial to support staff in achieving the best possible care in low‐resource settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7379246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73792462020-07-24 Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings Housseine, Natasha Punt, Marieke C. Browne, Joyce L. van ‘t Hooft, Janneke Maaløe, Nanna Meguid, Tarek Theron, Gerhard B. Franx, Arie Grobbee, Diederick E. Visser, Gerard H.A. Rijken, Marcus J. Int J Gynaecol Obstet From the Figo Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Committee OBJECTIVE: To determine acceptable and achievable strategies of intrapartum fetal monitoring in busy low‐resource settings. METHODS: Three rounds of online Delphi surveys were conducted between January 1 and October 31, 2017. International experts with experience in low‐resource settings scored the importance of intrapartum fetal monitoring methods. RESULTS: 71 experts completed all three rounds (28 midwives, 43 obstetricians). Consensus was reached on (1) need for an admission test, (2) handheld Doppler for intrapartum fetal monitoring, (3) intermittent auscultation (IA) every 30 minutes for low‐risk pregnancies during the first stage of labor and after every contraction for high‐risk pregnancies in the second stage, (4) contraction monitoring hourly for low‐risk pregnancies in the first stage, and (5) adjunctive tests. Consensus was not reached on frequency of IA or contraction monitoring for high‐risk women in the first stage or low‐risk women in the second stage of labor. CONCLUSION: There is a gap between international recommendations and what is physically possible in many labor wards in low‐resource settings. Research on how to effectively implement the consensus on fetal assessment at admission and use of handheld Doppler during labor and delivery is crucial to support staff in achieving the best possible care in low‐resource settings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-24 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7379246/ /pubmed/30582153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12724 Text en © 2018 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle From the Figo Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Committee
Housseine, Natasha
Punt, Marieke C.
Browne, Joyce L.
van ‘t Hooft, Janneke
Maaløe, Nanna
Meguid, Tarek
Theron, Gerhard B.
Franx, Arie
Grobbee, Diederick E.
Visser, Gerard H.A.
Rijken, Marcus J.
Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings
title Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings
title_full Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings
title_fullStr Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings
title_full_unstemmed Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings
title_short Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings
title_sort delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings
topic From the Figo Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Committee
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30582153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12724
work_keys_str_mv AT housseinenatasha delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings
AT puntmariekec delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings
AT brownejoycel delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings
AT vanthooftjanneke delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings
AT maaløenanna delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings
AT meguidtarek delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings
AT therongerhardb delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings
AT franxarie delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings
AT grobbeediedericke delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings
AT vissergerardha delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings
AT rijkenmarcusj delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings