Cargando…
Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings
OBJECTIVE: To determine acceptable and achievable strategies of intrapartum fetal monitoring in busy low‐resource settings. METHODS: Three rounds of online Delphi surveys were conducted between January 1 and October 31, 2017. International experts with experience in low‐resource settings scored the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30582153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12724 |
_version_ | 1783562597394546688 |
---|---|
author | Housseine, Natasha Punt, Marieke C. Browne, Joyce L. van ‘t Hooft, Janneke Maaløe, Nanna Meguid, Tarek Theron, Gerhard B. Franx, Arie Grobbee, Diederick E. Visser, Gerard H.A. Rijken, Marcus J. |
author_facet | Housseine, Natasha Punt, Marieke C. Browne, Joyce L. van ‘t Hooft, Janneke Maaløe, Nanna Meguid, Tarek Theron, Gerhard B. Franx, Arie Grobbee, Diederick E. Visser, Gerard H.A. Rijken, Marcus J. |
author_sort | Housseine, Natasha |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine acceptable and achievable strategies of intrapartum fetal monitoring in busy low‐resource settings. METHODS: Three rounds of online Delphi surveys were conducted between January 1 and October 31, 2017. International experts with experience in low‐resource settings scored the importance of intrapartum fetal monitoring methods. RESULTS: 71 experts completed all three rounds (28 midwives, 43 obstetricians). Consensus was reached on (1) need for an admission test, (2) handheld Doppler for intrapartum fetal monitoring, (3) intermittent auscultation (IA) every 30 minutes for low‐risk pregnancies during the first stage of labor and after every contraction for high‐risk pregnancies in the second stage, (4) contraction monitoring hourly for low‐risk pregnancies in the first stage, and (5) adjunctive tests. Consensus was not reached on frequency of IA or contraction monitoring for high‐risk women in the first stage or low‐risk women in the second stage of labor. CONCLUSION: There is a gap between international recommendations and what is physically possible in many labor wards in low‐resource settings. Research on how to effectively implement the consensus on fetal assessment at admission and use of handheld Doppler during labor and delivery is crucial to support staff in achieving the best possible care in low‐resource settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7379246 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73792462020-07-24 Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings Housseine, Natasha Punt, Marieke C. Browne, Joyce L. van ‘t Hooft, Janneke Maaløe, Nanna Meguid, Tarek Theron, Gerhard B. Franx, Arie Grobbee, Diederick E. Visser, Gerard H.A. Rijken, Marcus J. Int J Gynaecol Obstet From the Figo Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Committee OBJECTIVE: To determine acceptable and achievable strategies of intrapartum fetal monitoring in busy low‐resource settings. METHODS: Three rounds of online Delphi surveys were conducted between January 1 and October 31, 2017. International experts with experience in low‐resource settings scored the importance of intrapartum fetal monitoring methods. RESULTS: 71 experts completed all three rounds (28 midwives, 43 obstetricians). Consensus was reached on (1) need for an admission test, (2) handheld Doppler for intrapartum fetal monitoring, (3) intermittent auscultation (IA) every 30 minutes for low‐risk pregnancies during the first stage of labor and after every contraction for high‐risk pregnancies in the second stage, (4) contraction monitoring hourly for low‐risk pregnancies in the first stage, and (5) adjunctive tests. Consensus was not reached on frequency of IA or contraction monitoring for high‐risk women in the first stage or low‐risk women in the second stage of labor. CONCLUSION: There is a gap between international recommendations and what is physically possible in many labor wards in low‐resource settings. Research on how to effectively implement the consensus on fetal assessment at admission and use of handheld Doppler during labor and delivery is crucial to support staff in achieving the best possible care in low‐resource settings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-24 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7379246/ /pubmed/30582153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12724 Text en © 2018 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | From the Figo Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Committee Housseine, Natasha Punt, Marieke C. Browne, Joyce L. van ‘t Hooft, Janneke Maaløe, Nanna Meguid, Tarek Theron, Gerhard B. Franx, Arie Grobbee, Diederick E. Visser, Gerard H.A. Rijken, Marcus J. Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings |
title | Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings |
title_full | Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings |
title_fullStr | Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings |
title_short | Delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings |
title_sort | delphi consensus statement on intrapartum fetal monitoring in low‐resource settings |
topic | From the Figo Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Committee |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30582153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12724 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT housseinenatasha delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings AT puntmariekec delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings AT brownejoycel delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings AT vanthooftjanneke delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings AT maaløenanna delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings AT meguidtarek delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings AT therongerhardb delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings AT franxarie delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings AT grobbeediedericke delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings AT vissergerardha delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings AT rijkenmarcusj delphiconsensusstatementonintrapartumfetalmonitoringinlowresourcesettings |