Cargando…

Comparison of two models to estimate genetic parameters for number of born alive in pigs

The performance of the two‐trait animal model that regards the first parity and later parities as two different traits in estimating genetic parameters for number of born alive (NBA) was examined using real and simulated data. Genetic parameters for NBA were estimated in purebred Landrace and Large...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Konta, Ayane, Ogawa, Shinichiro, Kimata, Makoto, Ishii, Kazuo, Uemoto, Yoshinobu, Satoh, Masahiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32662131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/asj.13417
_version_ 1783562610434637824
author Konta, Ayane
Ogawa, Shinichiro
Kimata, Makoto
Ishii, Kazuo
Uemoto, Yoshinobu
Satoh, Masahiro
author_facet Konta, Ayane
Ogawa, Shinichiro
Kimata, Makoto
Ishii, Kazuo
Uemoto, Yoshinobu
Satoh, Masahiro
author_sort Konta, Ayane
collection PubMed
description The performance of the two‐trait animal model that regards the first parity and later parities as two different traits in estimating genetic parameters for number of born alive (NBA) was examined using real and simulated data. Genetic parameters for NBA were estimated in purebred Landrace and Large White pigs using a single‐trait repeatability model (Model 1) that regards all parities as the same trait and a two‐trait animal model (Model 2) that regards the first and the later parities as different traits. For Model 2, the permanent environmental effect was fitted to only the records of the later parities. Heritability for NBA estimated using Model 1 was 0.12 for Landrace and 0.11 for Large White. Estimated heritability for NBA of the first parity and the later parities was 0.21 and 0.16, respectively, for Landrace; 0.18 and 0.16, respectively, for Large White obtained using Model 2, and higher than those in both breeds obtained using Model 1. Further results based on data simulated using the Monte Carlo method suggest that estimated additive genetic variance could be more biased using Model 2 than Model 1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7379304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73793042020-07-24 Comparison of two models to estimate genetic parameters for number of born alive in pigs Konta, Ayane Ogawa, Shinichiro Kimata, Makoto Ishii, Kazuo Uemoto, Yoshinobu Satoh, Masahiro Anim Sci J Original Articles The performance of the two‐trait animal model that regards the first parity and later parities as two different traits in estimating genetic parameters for number of born alive (NBA) was examined using real and simulated data. Genetic parameters for NBA were estimated in purebred Landrace and Large White pigs using a single‐trait repeatability model (Model 1) that regards all parities as the same trait and a two‐trait animal model (Model 2) that regards the first and the later parities as different traits. For Model 2, the permanent environmental effect was fitted to only the records of the later parities. Heritability for NBA estimated using Model 1 was 0.12 for Landrace and 0.11 for Large White. Estimated heritability for NBA of the first parity and the later parities was 0.21 and 0.16, respectively, for Landrace; 0.18 and 0.16, respectively, for Large White obtained using Model 2, and higher than those in both breeds obtained using Model 1. Further results based on data simulated using the Monte Carlo method suggest that estimated additive genetic variance could be more biased using Model 2 than Model 1. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7379304/ /pubmed/32662131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/asj.13417 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Animal Science Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Animal Science This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Konta, Ayane
Ogawa, Shinichiro
Kimata, Makoto
Ishii, Kazuo
Uemoto, Yoshinobu
Satoh, Masahiro
Comparison of two models to estimate genetic parameters for number of born alive in pigs
title Comparison of two models to estimate genetic parameters for number of born alive in pigs
title_full Comparison of two models to estimate genetic parameters for number of born alive in pigs
title_fullStr Comparison of two models to estimate genetic parameters for number of born alive in pigs
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two models to estimate genetic parameters for number of born alive in pigs
title_short Comparison of two models to estimate genetic parameters for number of born alive in pigs
title_sort comparison of two models to estimate genetic parameters for number of born alive in pigs
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32662131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/asj.13417
work_keys_str_mv AT kontaayane comparisonoftwomodelstoestimategeneticparametersfornumberofbornaliveinpigs
AT ogawashinichiro comparisonoftwomodelstoestimategeneticparametersfornumberofbornaliveinpigs
AT kimatamakoto comparisonoftwomodelstoestimategeneticparametersfornumberofbornaliveinpigs
AT ishiikazuo comparisonoftwomodelstoestimategeneticparametersfornumberofbornaliveinpigs
AT uemotoyoshinobu comparisonoftwomodelstoestimategeneticparametersfornumberofbornaliveinpigs
AT satohmasahiro comparisonoftwomodelstoestimategeneticparametersfornumberofbornaliveinpigs