Cargando…

Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding

BACKGROUND/AIM: To investigate the correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 955 patients with PUB were assessed using the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index, as well...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: YANG, Hong, PAN*, Chen, LIU, Qi, WANG, Yan, LIU, Zhe, CAO, Xian, LEI, Jingjing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041384
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1906-154
_version_ 1783562645338587136
author YANG, Hong
PAN*, Chen
LIU, Qi
WANG, Yan
LIU, Zhe
CAO, Xian
LEI, Jingjing
author_facet YANG, Hong
PAN*, Chen
LIU, Qi
WANG, Yan
LIU, Zhe
CAO, Xian
LEI, Jingjing
author_sort YANG, Hong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIM: To investigate the correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 955 patients with PUB were assessed using the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index, as well as the Forrest classification based on their gastroscopy results. The correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index was determined using scatter plot analysis, and the correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score or shock index and Forrest classification was determined using Spearman’s analysis. RESULTS: Both the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index showed the highest values in patients with Forrest class IIa. The Glasgow-Blatchford score was significantly higher than patients with Forrest class Ib/IIc/III (P < 0.05), and the shock index was significantly higher than patients with Forrest class Ib/IIb/III (P < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index, at r = 0.427 (P < 0.001). A negative correlation was observed between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and Forrest classification, at r = –0.111 (P < 0.01), and between the shock index and Forrest classification, at r = –0.138 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A moderate correlation was observed between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index in patients with PUB, and the correlation between the Forrest classification and Glasgow-Blatchford score or shock index was relatively low.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7379461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73794612020-07-27 Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding YANG, Hong PAN*, Chen LIU, Qi WANG, Yan LIU, Zhe CAO, Xian LEI, Jingjing Turk J Med Sci Article BACKGROUND/AIM: To investigate the correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 955 patients with PUB were assessed using the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index, as well as the Forrest classification based on their gastroscopy results. The correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index was determined using scatter plot analysis, and the correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score or shock index and Forrest classification was determined using Spearman’s analysis. RESULTS: Both the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index showed the highest values in patients with Forrest class IIa. The Glasgow-Blatchford score was significantly higher than patients with Forrest class Ib/IIc/III (P < 0.05), and the shock index was significantly higher than patients with Forrest class Ib/IIb/III (P < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index, at r = 0.427 (P < 0.001). A negative correlation was observed between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and Forrest classification, at r = –0.111 (P < 0.01), and between the shock index and Forrest classification, at r = –0.138 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A moderate correlation was observed between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index in patients with PUB, and the correlation between the Forrest classification and Glasgow-Blatchford score or shock index was relatively low. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7379461/ /pubmed/32041384 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1906-154 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
YANG, Hong
PAN*, Chen
LIU, Qi
WANG, Yan
LIU, Zhe
CAO, Xian
LEI, Jingjing
Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding
title Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding
title_full Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding
title_fullStr Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding
title_full_unstemmed Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding
title_short Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding
title_sort correlation between the glasgow-blatchford score, shock index, and forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041384
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1906-154
work_keys_str_mv AT yanghong correlationbetweentheglasgowblatchfordscoreshockindexandforrestclassificationinpatientswithpepticulcerbleeding
AT panchen correlationbetweentheglasgowblatchfordscoreshockindexandforrestclassificationinpatientswithpepticulcerbleeding
AT liuqi correlationbetweentheglasgowblatchfordscoreshockindexandforrestclassificationinpatientswithpepticulcerbleeding
AT wangyan correlationbetweentheglasgowblatchfordscoreshockindexandforrestclassificationinpatientswithpepticulcerbleeding
AT liuzhe correlationbetweentheglasgowblatchfordscoreshockindexandforrestclassificationinpatientswithpepticulcerbleeding
AT caoxian correlationbetweentheglasgowblatchfordscoreshockindexandforrestclassificationinpatientswithpepticulcerbleeding
AT leijingjing correlationbetweentheglasgowblatchfordscoreshockindexandforrestclassificationinpatientswithpepticulcerbleeding