Cargando…
Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding
BACKGROUND/AIM: To investigate the correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 955 patients with PUB were assessed using the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index, as well...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041384 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1906-154 |
_version_ | 1783562645338587136 |
---|---|
author | YANG, Hong PAN*, Chen LIU, Qi WANG, Yan LIU, Zhe CAO, Xian LEI, Jingjing |
author_facet | YANG, Hong PAN*, Chen LIU, Qi WANG, Yan LIU, Zhe CAO, Xian LEI, Jingjing |
author_sort | YANG, Hong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIM: To investigate the correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 955 patients with PUB were assessed using the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index, as well as the Forrest classification based on their gastroscopy results. The correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index was determined using scatter plot analysis, and the correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score or shock index and Forrest classification was determined using Spearman’s analysis. RESULTS: Both the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index showed the highest values in patients with Forrest class IIa. The Glasgow-Blatchford score was significantly higher than patients with Forrest class Ib/IIc/III (P < 0.05), and the shock index was significantly higher than patients with Forrest class Ib/IIb/III (P < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index, at r = 0.427 (P < 0.001). A negative correlation was observed between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and Forrest classification, at r = –0.111 (P < 0.01), and between the shock index and Forrest classification, at r = –0.138 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A moderate correlation was observed between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index in patients with PUB, and the correlation between the Forrest classification and Glasgow-Blatchford score or shock index was relatively low. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7379461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73794612020-07-27 Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding YANG, Hong PAN*, Chen LIU, Qi WANG, Yan LIU, Zhe CAO, Xian LEI, Jingjing Turk J Med Sci Article BACKGROUND/AIM: To investigate the correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 955 patients with PUB were assessed using the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index, as well as the Forrest classification based on their gastroscopy results. The correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index was determined using scatter plot analysis, and the correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score or shock index and Forrest classification was determined using Spearman’s analysis. RESULTS: Both the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index showed the highest values in patients with Forrest class IIa. The Glasgow-Blatchford score was significantly higher than patients with Forrest class Ib/IIc/III (P < 0.05), and the shock index was significantly higher than patients with Forrest class Ib/IIb/III (P < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index, at r = 0.427 (P < 0.001). A negative correlation was observed between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and Forrest classification, at r = –0.111 (P < 0.01), and between the shock index and Forrest classification, at r = –0.138 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A moderate correlation was observed between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index in patients with PUB, and the correlation between the Forrest classification and Glasgow-Blatchford score or shock index was relatively low. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7379461/ /pubmed/32041384 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1906-154 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article YANG, Hong PAN*, Chen LIU, Qi WANG, Yan LIU, Zhe CAO, Xian LEI, Jingjing Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding |
title | Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding |
title_full | Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding |
title_fullStr | Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding |
title_full_unstemmed | Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding |
title_short | Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding |
title_sort | correlation between the glasgow-blatchford score, shock index, and forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041384 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1906-154 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanghong correlationbetweentheglasgowblatchfordscoreshockindexandforrestclassificationinpatientswithpepticulcerbleeding AT panchen correlationbetweentheglasgowblatchfordscoreshockindexandforrestclassificationinpatientswithpepticulcerbleeding AT liuqi correlationbetweentheglasgowblatchfordscoreshockindexandforrestclassificationinpatientswithpepticulcerbleeding AT wangyan correlationbetweentheglasgowblatchfordscoreshockindexandforrestclassificationinpatientswithpepticulcerbleeding AT liuzhe correlationbetweentheglasgowblatchfordscoreshockindexandforrestclassificationinpatientswithpepticulcerbleeding AT caoxian correlationbetweentheglasgowblatchfordscoreshockindexandforrestclassificationinpatientswithpepticulcerbleeding AT leijingjing correlationbetweentheglasgowblatchfordscoreshockindexandforrestclassificationinpatientswithpepticulcerbleeding |