Cargando…

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Vocal Fatigue Index

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted with 535 participants including 285 patients with voice disorders and 250 healthy controls. Internal consistency a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ŞİRİN, Seher, ÖĞÜT, Mehmet Fatih, BİLGEN, Cem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32421276
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1908-105
_version_ 1783562646537109504
author ŞİRİN, Seher
ÖĞÜT, Mehmet Fatih
BİLGEN, Cem
author_facet ŞİRİN, Seher
ÖĞÜT, Mehmet Fatih
BİLGEN, Cem
author_sort ŞİRİN, Seher
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted with 535 participants including 285 patients with voice disorders and 250 healthy controls. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were calculated for the reliability analysis. The mean VFI factor scores of both groups were compared. The strength and direction of the relation between VFI and Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) measure was evaluated for the validity analysis. RESULTS: The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of VFI factor scores was found to be 0.920 for tiredness and avoidance of voice use, 0.879 for physical discomfort with voice use, and 0.882 for improvement of symptoms with voice rest. The test-retest reliability revealed 0.877 for the tiredness and avoidance of voice use, 0.913 for the physical discomfort with voice use, and 0.820 for the improvement of symptoms with voice rest. When compared with healthy individuals, VFI factor scores were statistically significant higher in patients with voice disorders. The V-RQOL scores decreased significantly as the VFI scores increased. CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of the VFI is a good reliable and valid instrument for evaluating vocal fatigue symptoms in the Turkish-speaking community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7379466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73794662020-07-27 Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Vocal Fatigue Index ŞİRİN, Seher ÖĞÜT, Mehmet Fatih BİLGEN, Cem Turk J Med Sci Article BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted with 535 participants including 285 patients with voice disorders and 250 healthy controls. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were calculated for the reliability analysis. The mean VFI factor scores of both groups were compared. The strength and direction of the relation between VFI and Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) measure was evaluated for the validity analysis. RESULTS: The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of VFI factor scores was found to be 0.920 for tiredness and avoidance of voice use, 0.879 for physical discomfort with voice use, and 0.882 for improvement of symptoms with voice rest. The test-retest reliability revealed 0.877 for the tiredness and avoidance of voice use, 0.913 for the physical discomfort with voice use, and 0.820 for the improvement of symptoms with voice rest. When compared with healthy individuals, VFI factor scores were statistically significant higher in patients with voice disorders. The V-RQOL scores decreased significantly as the VFI scores increased. CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of the VFI is a good reliable and valid instrument for evaluating vocal fatigue symptoms in the Turkish-speaking community. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7379466/ /pubmed/32421276 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1908-105 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
ŞİRİN, Seher
ÖĞÜT, Mehmet Fatih
BİLGEN, Cem
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Vocal Fatigue Index
title Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Vocal Fatigue Index
title_full Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Vocal Fatigue Index
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Vocal Fatigue Index
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Vocal Fatigue Index
title_short Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Vocal Fatigue Index
title_sort reliability and validity of the turkish version of the vocal fatigue index
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32421276
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1908-105
work_keys_str_mv AT sirinseher reliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionofthevocalfatigueindex
AT ogutmehmetfatih reliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionofthevocalfatigueindex
AT bilgencem reliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionofthevocalfatigueindex