Cargando…

The (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: A systematic review

Integrated care is increasingly promoted as an effective and cost‐effective way to organise care for community‐dwelling frail older people with complex problems but the question remains whether high expectations are justified. Our study aims to systematically review the empirical evidence for the ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Looman, Wilhelmina Mijntje, Huijsman, Robbert, Fabbricotti, Isabelle Natalina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29667259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12571
_version_ 1783562652435349504
author Looman, Wilhelmina Mijntje
Huijsman, Robbert
Fabbricotti, Isabelle Natalina
author_facet Looman, Wilhelmina Mijntje
Huijsman, Robbert
Fabbricotti, Isabelle Natalina
author_sort Looman, Wilhelmina Mijntje
collection PubMed
description Integrated care is increasingly promoted as an effective and cost‐effective way to organise care for community‐dwelling frail older people with complex problems but the question remains whether high expectations are justified. Our study aims to systematically review the empirical evidence for the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people and close attention is paid to the elements and levels of integration of the interventions. We searched nine databases for eligible studies until May 2016 with a comparison group and reporting at least one outcome regarding effectiveness or cost‐effectiveness. We identified 2,998 unique records and, after exclusions, selected 46 studies on 29 interventions. We assessed the quality of the included studies with the Effective Practice and Organization of Care risk‐of‐bias tool. The interventions were described following Rainbow Model of Integrated Care framework by Valentijn. Our systematic review reveals that the majority of the reported outcomes in the studies on preventive, integrated care show no effects. In terms of health outcomes, effectiveness is demonstrated most often for seldom‐reported outcomes such as well‐being. Outcomes regarding informal caregivers and professionals are rarely considered and negligible. Most promising are the care process outcomes that did improve for preventive, integrated care interventions as compared to usual care. Healthcare utilisation was the most reported outcome but we found mixed results. Evidence for cost‐effectiveness is limited. High expectations should be tempered given this limited and fragmented evidence for the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for frail older people. Future research should focus on unravelling the heterogeneity of frailty and on exploring what outcomes among frail older people may realistically be expected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7379491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73794912020-07-24 The (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: A systematic review Looman, Wilhelmina Mijntje Huijsman, Robbert Fabbricotti, Isabelle Natalina Health Soc Care Community Review Articles Integrated care is increasingly promoted as an effective and cost‐effective way to organise care for community‐dwelling frail older people with complex problems but the question remains whether high expectations are justified. Our study aims to systematically review the empirical evidence for the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people and close attention is paid to the elements and levels of integration of the interventions. We searched nine databases for eligible studies until May 2016 with a comparison group and reporting at least one outcome regarding effectiveness or cost‐effectiveness. We identified 2,998 unique records and, after exclusions, selected 46 studies on 29 interventions. We assessed the quality of the included studies with the Effective Practice and Organization of Care risk‐of‐bias tool. The interventions were described following Rainbow Model of Integrated Care framework by Valentijn. Our systematic review reveals that the majority of the reported outcomes in the studies on preventive, integrated care show no effects. In terms of health outcomes, effectiveness is demonstrated most often for seldom‐reported outcomes such as well‐being. Outcomes regarding informal caregivers and professionals are rarely considered and negligible. Most promising are the care process outcomes that did improve for preventive, integrated care interventions as compared to usual care. Healthcare utilisation was the most reported outcome but we found mixed results. Evidence for cost‐effectiveness is limited. High expectations should be tempered given this limited and fragmented evidence for the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for frail older people. Future research should focus on unravelling the heterogeneity of frailty and on exploring what outcomes among frail older people may realistically be expected. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-17 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7379491/ /pubmed/29667259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12571 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Health and Social Care in the Community Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Looman, Wilhelmina Mijntje
Huijsman, Robbert
Fabbricotti, Isabelle Natalina
The (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: A systematic review
title The (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: A systematic review
title_full The (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: A systematic review
title_fullStr The (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: A systematic review
title_short The (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: A systematic review
title_sort (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: a systematic review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29667259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12571
work_keys_str_mv AT loomanwilhelminamijntje thecosteffectivenessofpreventiveintegratedcareforcommunitydwellingfrailolderpeopleasystematicreview
AT huijsmanrobbert thecosteffectivenessofpreventiveintegratedcareforcommunitydwellingfrailolderpeopleasystematicreview
AT fabbricottiisabellenatalina thecosteffectivenessofpreventiveintegratedcareforcommunitydwellingfrailolderpeopleasystematicreview
AT loomanwilhelminamijntje costeffectivenessofpreventiveintegratedcareforcommunitydwellingfrailolderpeopleasystematicreview
AT huijsmanrobbert costeffectivenessofpreventiveintegratedcareforcommunitydwellingfrailolderpeopleasystematicreview
AT fabbricottiisabellenatalina costeffectivenessofpreventiveintegratedcareforcommunitydwellingfrailolderpeopleasystematicreview