Cargando…
The (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: A systematic review
Integrated care is increasingly promoted as an effective and cost‐effective way to organise care for community‐dwelling frail older people with complex problems but the question remains whether high expectations are justified. Our study aims to systematically review the empirical evidence for the ef...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29667259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12571 |
_version_ | 1783562652435349504 |
---|---|
author | Looman, Wilhelmina Mijntje Huijsman, Robbert Fabbricotti, Isabelle Natalina |
author_facet | Looman, Wilhelmina Mijntje Huijsman, Robbert Fabbricotti, Isabelle Natalina |
author_sort | Looman, Wilhelmina Mijntje |
collection | PubMed |
description | Integrated care is increasingly promoted as an effective and cost‐effective way to organise care for community‐dwelling frail older people with complex problems but the question remains whether high expectations are justified. Our study aims to systematically review the empirical evidence for the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people and close attention is paid to the elements and levels of integration of the interventions. We searched nine databases for eligible studies until May 2016 with a comparison group and reporting at least one outcome regarding effectiveness or cost‐effectiveness. We identified 2,998 unique records and, after exclusions, selected 46 studies on 29 interventions. We assessed the quality of the included studies with the Effective Practice and Organization of Care risk‐of‐bias tool. The interventions were described following Rainbow Model of Integrated Care framework by Valentijn. Our systematic review reveals that the majority of the reported outcomes in the studies on preventive, integrated care show no effects. In terms of health outcomes, effectiveness is demonstrated most often for seldom‐reported outcomes such as well‐being. Outcomes regarding informal caregivers and professionals are rarely considered and negligible. Most promising are the care process outcomes that did improve for preventive, integrated care interventions as compared to usual care. Healthcare utilisation was the most reported outcome but we found mixed results. Evidence for cost‐effectiveness is limited. High expectations should be tempered given this limited and fragmented evidence for the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for frail older people. Future research should focus on unravelling the heterogeneity of frailty and on exploring what outcomes among frail older people may realistically be expected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7379491 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73794912020-07-24 The (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: A systematic review Looman, Wilhelmina Mijntje Huijsman, Robbert Fabbricotti, Isabelle Natalina Health Soc Care Community Review Articles Integrated care is increasingly promoted as an effective and cost‐effective way to organise care for community‐dwelling frail older people with complex problems but the question remains whether high expectations are justified. Our study aims to systematically review the empirical evidence for the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people and close attention is paid to the elements and levels of integration of the interventions. We searched nine databases for eligible studies until May 2016 with a comparison group and reporting at least one outcome regarding effectiveness or cost‐effectiveness. We identified 2,998 unique records and, after exclusions, selected 46 studies on 29 interventions. We assessed the quality of the included studies with the Effective Practice and Organization of Care risk‐of‐bias tool. The interventions were described following Rainbow Model of Integrated Care framework by Valentijn. Our systematic review reveals that the majority of the reported outcomes in the studies on preventive, integrated care show no effects. In terms of health outcomes, effectiveness is demonstrated most often for seldom‐reported outcomes such as well‐being. Outcomes regarding informal caregivers and professionals are rarely considered and negligible. Most promising are the care process outcomes that did improve for preventive, integrated care interventions as compared to usual care. Healthcare utilisation was the most reported outcome but we found mixed results. Evidence for cost‐effectiveness is limited. High expectations should be tempered given this limited and fragmented evidence for the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for frail older people. Future research should focus on unravelling the heterogeneity of frailty and on exploring what outcomes among frail older people may realistically be expected. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-17 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7379491/ /pubmed/29667259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12571 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Health and Social Care in the Community Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Looman, Wilhelmina Mijntje Huijsman, Robbert Fabbricotti, Isabelle Natalina The (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: A systematic review |
title | The (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: A systematic review |
title_full | The (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | The (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: A systematic review |
title_short | The (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: A systematic review |
title_sort | (cost‐)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community‐dwelling frail older people: a systematic review |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29667259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12571 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loomanwilhelminamijntje thecosteffectivenessofpreventiveintegratedcareforcommunitydwellingfrailolderpeopleasystematicreview AT huijsmanrobbert thecosteffectivenessofpreventiveintegratedcareforcommunitydwellingfrailolderpeopleasystematicreview AT fabbricottiisabellenatalina thecosteffectivenessofpreventiveintegratedcareforcommunitydwellingfrailolderpeopleasystematicreview AT loomanwilhelminamijntje costeffectivenessofpreventiveintegratedcareforcommunitydwellingfrailolderpeopleasystematicreview AT huijsmanrobbert costeffectivenessofpreventiveintegratedcareforcommunitydwellingfrailolderpeopleasystematicreview AT fabbricottiisabellenatalina costeffectivenessofpreventiveintegratedcareforcommunitydwellingfrailolderpeopleasystematicreview |