Cargando…
Fast technetium‐99m liver SPECT for evaluation of the pretreatment procedure for radioembolization dosimetry
PURPOSE: The efficiency of radioembolization procedures could be greatly enhanced if results of the (99m)Tc‐MAA pretreatment procedure were immediately available in the interventional suite, enabling 1‐day procedures as a result of direct estimation of the hepatic radiation dose and lung shunt fract...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30347130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13253 |
_version_ | 1783562655954370560 |
---|---|
author | van der Velden, Sandra Dietze, Martijn M. A. Viergever, Max A. de Jong, Hugo W. A. M. |
author_facet | van der Velden, Sandra Dietze, Martijn M. A. Viergever, Max A. de Jong, Hugo W. A. M. |
author_sort | van der Velden, Sandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The efficiency of radioembolization procedures could be greatly enhanced if results of the (99m)Tc‐MAA pretreatment procedure were immediately available in the interventional suite, enabling 1‐day procedures as a result of direct estimation of the hepatic radiation dose and lung shunt fraction. This would, however, require a relatively fast, but still quantitative, SPECT procedure, which might be achieved with acquisition protocols using nonuniform durations of the projection images. METHODS: SPECT liver images of the 150‐MBq (99m)Tc‐MAA pretreatment procedure were simulated for eight different lesion locations and two different lesion sizes using the digital XCAT phantom for both single‐ and dual‐head scanning geometries with respective total acquisition times of 1, 2, 5, 10, and 30 min. Three nonuniform projection‐time acquisition protocols (“half‐circle SPECT (HCS),” “nonuniform SPECT (NUS) I,” and “NUS II”) for fast quantitative SPECT of the liver were designed and compared with the standard uniform projection‐time protocol. Images were evaluated in terms of contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), activity recovery coefficient (ARC), tumor/non‐tumor (T/N) activity concentration ratio, and lung shunt fraction (LSF) estimation. In addition, image quality was verified with a physical phantom experiment, reconstructed with both clinical and Monte Carlo‐based reconstruction software. RESULTS: Simulations showed no substantial change in image quality and dosimetry by usage of a nonuniform projection‐time acquisition protocol. Upon shortening acquisition times, CNR dropped, but ARC, T/N ratio, and LSF estimates were stable across all simulated acquisition times. Results of the physical phantom were in agreement with those of the simulations. CONCLUSION: Both uniform and nonuniform projection‐time acquisition liver SPECT protocols yield accurate dosimetric metrics for radioembolization treatment planning in the interventional suite within 10 min, without compromising image quality. Consequently, fast quantitative SPECT of the liver in the interventional suite is feasible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7379506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73795062020-07-24 Fast technetium‐99m liver SPECT for evaluation of the pretreatment procedure for radioembolization dosimetry van der Velden, Sandra Dietze, Martijn M. A. Viergever, Max A. de Jong, Hugo W. A. M. Med Phys COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY PURPOSE: The efficiency of radioembolization procedures could be greatly enhanced if results of the (99m)Tc‐MAA pretreatment procedure were immediately available in the interventional suite, enabling 1‐day procedures as a result of direct estimation of the hepatic radiation dose and lung shunt fraction. This would, however, require a relatively fast, but still quantitative, SPECT procedure, which might be achieved with acquisition protocols using nonuniform durations of the projection images. METHODS: SPECT liver images of the 150‐MBq (99m)Tc‐MAA pretreatment procedure were simulated for eight different lesion locations and two different lesion sizes using the digital XCAT phantom for both single‐ and dual‐head scanning geometries with respective total acquisition times of 1, 2, 5, 10, and 30 min. Three nonuniform projection‐time acquisition protocols (“half‐circle SPECT (HCS),” “nonuniform SPECT (NUS) I,” and “NUS II”) for fast quantitative SPECT of the liver were designed and compared with the standard uniform projection‐time protocol. Images were evaluated in terms of contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), activity recovery coefficient (ARC), tumor/non‐tumor (T/N) activity concentration ratio, and lung shunt fraction (LSF) estimation. In addition, image quality was verified with a physical phantom experiment, reconstructed with both clinical and Monte Carlo‐based reconstruction software. RESULTS: Simulations showed no substantial change in image quality and dosimetry by usage of a nonuniform projection‐time acquisition protocol. Upon shortening acquisition times, CNR dropped, but ARC, T/N ratio, and LSF estimates were stable across all simulated acquisition times. Results of the physical phantom were in agreement with those of the simulations. CONCLUSION: Both uniform and nonuniform projection‐time acquisition liver SPECT protocols yield accurate dosimetric metrics for radioembolization treatment planning in the interventional suite within 10 min, without compromising image quality. Consequently, fast quantitative SPECT of the liver in the interventional suite is feasible. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-13 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7379506/ /pubmed/30347130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13253 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY van der Velden, Sandra Dietze, Martijn M. A. Viergever, Max A. de Jong, Hugo W. A. M. Fast technetium‐99m liver SPECT for evaluation of the pretreatment procedure for radioembolization dosimetry |
title | Fast technetium‐99m liver SPECT for evaluation of the pretreatment procedure for radioembolization dosimetry |
title_full | Fast technetium‐99m liver SPECT for evaluation of the pretreatment procedure for radioembolization dosimetry |
title_fullStr | Fast technetium‐99m liver SPECT for evaluation of the pretreatment procedure for radioembolization dosimetry |
title_full_unstemmed | Fast technetium‐99m liver SPECT for evaluation of the pretreatment procedure for radioembolization dosimetry |
title_short | Fast technetium‐99m liver SPECT for evaluation of the pretreatment procedure for radioembolization dosimetry |
title_sort | fast technetium‐99m liver spect for evaluation of the pretreatment procedure for radioembolization dosimetry |
topic | COMPUTATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DOSIMETRY |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30347130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13253 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderveldensandra fasttechnetium99mliverspectforevaluationofthepretreatmentprocedureforradioembolizationdosimetry AT dietzemartijnma fasttechnetium99mliverspectforevaluationofthepretreatmentprocedureforradioembolizationdosimetry AT viergevermaxa fasttechnetium99mliverspectforevaluationofthepretreatmentprocedureforradioembolizationdosimetry AT dejonghugowam fasttechnetium99mliverspectforevaluationofthepretreatmentprocedureforradioembolizationdosimetry |