Cargando…

Is plaque regrowth inhibited by dentifrice?: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to establish in studies with human participants the effect of a regular fluoride dentifrice compared to water or saline on dental plaque inhibition. METHODS: MEDLINE‐PubMed, Cochrane‐CENTRAL, EMBASE and other electronic databases were searched, up to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valkenburg, Cees, Van der Weijden, Fridus, Slot, Dagmar Else
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30169912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/idh.12364
_version_ 1783562668021383168
author Valkenburg, Cees
Van der Weijden, Fridus
Slot, Dagmar Else
author_facet Valkenburg, Cees
Van der Weijden, Fridus
Slot, Dagmar Else
author_sort Valkenburg, Cees
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to establish in studies with human participants the effect of a regular fluoride dentifrice compared to water or saline on dental plaque inhibition. METHODS: MEDLINE‐PubMed, Cochrane‐CENTRAL, EMBASE and other electronic databases were searched, up to April 2018. The inclusion criteria were controlled clinical trials among participants aged ≥18 years with good general health. Papers that evaluated the effect of dentifrice slurry compared with water or saline on plaque regrowth during a 4‐day nonbrushing period were included. Data were extracted from the eligible studies, the risk of bias was assessed, and a meta‐analysis was performed where feasible. RESULT: The search retrieved eight eligible publications including 25 comparisons. The estimated potential risk of bias was low for all studies. Based on three different indices, overall plaque regrowth was significantly (P < 0.01) inhibited for 0.25 or more by the use of a dentifrice slurry as compared to water. All subanalysis on specific dentifrice ingredients and the overall descriptive analysis supported these findings. CONCLUSION: The results of this review demonstrate moderate‐quality evidence for a weak inhibitory effect on plaque regrowth in favour of the use of a dentifrice intended for daily use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7379558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73795582020-07-24 Is plaque regrowth inhibited by dentifrice?: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis Valkenburg, Cees Van der Weijden, Fridus Slot, Dagmar Else Int J Dent Hyg Review Articles OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to establish in studies with human participants the effect of a regular fluoride dentifrice compared to water or saline on dental plaque inhibition. METHODS: MEDLINE‐PubMed, Cochrane‐CENTRAL, EMBASE and other electronic databases were searched, up to April 2018. The inclusion criteria were controlled clinical trials among participants aged ≥18 years with good general health. Papers that evaluated the effect of dentifrice slurry compared with water or saline on plaque regrowth during a 4‐day nonbrushing period were included. Data were extracted from the eligible studies, the risk of bias was assessed, and a meta‐analysis was performed where feasible. RESULT: The search retrieved eight eligible publications including 25 comparisons. The estimated potential risk of bias was low for all studies. Based on three different indices, overall plaque regrowth was significantly (P < 0.01) inhibited for 0.25 or more by the use of a dentifrice slurry as compared to water. All subanalysis on specific dentifrice ingredients and the overall descriptive analysis supported these findings. CONCLUSION: The results of this review demonstrate moderate‐quality evidence for a weak inhibitory effect on plaque regrowth in favour of the use of a dentifrice intended for daily use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-27 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7379558/ /pubmed/30169912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/idh.12364 Text en © 2018 The Authors. International Journal of Dental Hygiene Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Valkenburg, Cees
Van der Weijden, Fridus
Slot, Dagmar Else
Is plaque regrowth inhibited by dentifrice?: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis
title Is plaque regrowth inhibited by dentifrice?: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis
title_full Is plaque regrowth inhibited by dentifrice?: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis
title_fullStr Is plaque regrowth inhibited by dentifrice?: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis
title_full_unstemmed Is plaque regrowth inhibited by dentifrice?: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis
title_short Is plaque regrowth inhibited by dentifrice?: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis
title_sort is plaque regrowth inhibited by dentifrice?: a systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30169912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/idh.12364
work_keys_str_mv AT valkenburgcees isplaqueregrowthinhibitedbydentifriceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT vanderweijdenfridus isplaqueregrowthinhibitedbydentifriceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis
AT slotdagmarelse isplaqueregrowthinhibitedbydentifriceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis