Quantifying professionalism in peer review

BACKGROUND: The process of peer-review in academia has attracted criticism surrounding issues of bias, fairness, and professionalism; however, frequency of occurrence of such comments is unknown. METHODS: We evaluated 1491 sets of reviewer comments from the fields of “Ecology and Evolution” and “Beh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerwing, Travis G., Allen Gerwing, Alyssa M., Avery-Gomm, Stephanie, Choi, Chi-Yeung, Clements, Jeff C., Rash, Joshua A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00096-x

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00096-x

Ejemplares similares