Cargando…

Normalizing inconvenience to promote childhood vaccination: a qualitative implementation evaluation of a novel Michigan program

BACKGROUND: In 2015, Michigan implemented a rule requiring parents to attend an education session at a local health department (LHD) prior to waiving mandatory child vaccinations. This study utilizes Normalization Process Theory (NPT) to assess program implementation, identifying potential threats t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lillvis, Denise F., Willison, Charley, Noyes, Katia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32703208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05550-6
_version_ 1783562724153753600
author Lillvis, Denise F.
Willison, Charley
Noyes, Katia
author_facet Lillvis, Denise F.
Willison, Charley
Noyes, Katia
author_sort Lillvis, Denise F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2015, Michigan implemented a rule requiring parents to attend an education session at a local health department (LHD) prior to waiving mandatory child vaccinations. This study utilizes Normalization Process Theory (NPT) to assess program implementation, identifying potential threats to fidelity and sustainability. METHODS: We conducted 32 semi-structured interviews with individuals involved in these education programs across 16 LHDs. Participating LHDs were selected from a stratified, representative sample. One interviewer conducted all interviews using a semi-structured interview guide; two authors coded and analyzed the interview transcripts according to the NPT framework (i.e, sense-making, engagement, collective action, and reflexive monitoring). RESULTS: There was a lack of consensus about who the stakeholders of this new rule and its resulting program were (sense-making). Perhaps as a result, most LHDs did not solicit advice from key stakeholder groups (i.e., schools, health care providers, community stakeholders) in their planning (engagement). While most interviewees identified providing education and information as the goal, some identified the more challenging goal of persuading vaccine hesitant parents to immunize their children. There was also some variation in perception of who held health educators accountable for meeting the goals of the waiver education program (collective action). Formal program evaluation by LHDs was rare, although some held informal staff debriefings. Additionally, sessions that went particularly well or poorly were top-of-mind (reflexive monitoring). CONCLUSIONS: The immunization waiver education program may be at risk of not becoming fully embedded into routine LHD practice, potentially compromising its long-term effectiveness and sustainability. Managers at the local and state level should maintain oversight to ensure that the program is delivered with fidelity. As the program relies on sustaining inconvenience to encourage parents to immunize their children, any shortcuts taken will undermine its success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7379806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73798062020-08-04 Normalizing inconvenience to promote childhood vaccination: a qualitative implementation evaluation of a novel Michigan program Lillvis, Denise F. Willison, Charley Noyes, Katia BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2015, Michigan implemented a rule requiring parents to attend an education session at a local health department (LHD) prior to waiving mandatory child vaccinations. This study utilizes Normalization Process Theory (NPT) to assess program implementation, identifying potential threats to fidelity and sustainability. METHODS: We conducted 32 semi-structured interviews with individuals involved in these education programs across 16 LHDs. Participating LHDs were selected from a stratified, representative sample. One interviewer conducted all interviews using a semi-structured interview guide; two authors coded and analyzed the interview transcripts according to the NPT framework (i.e, sense-making, engagement, collective action, and reflexive monitoring). RESULTS: There was a lack of consensus about who the stakeholders of this new rule and its resulting program were (sense-making). Perhaps as a result, most LHDs did not solicit advice from key stakeholder groups (i.e., schools, health care providers, community stakeholders) in their planning (engagement). While most interviewees identified providing education and information as the goal, some identified the more challenging goal of persuading vaccine hesitant parents to immunize their children. There was also some variation in perception of who held health educators accountable for meeting the goals of the waiver education program (collective action). Formal program evaluation by LHDs was rare, although some held informal staff debriefings. Additionally, sessions that went particularly well or poorly were top-of-mind (reflexive monitoring). CONCLUSIONS: The immunization waiver education program may be at risk of not becoming fully embedded into routine LHD practice, potentially compromising its long-term effectiveness and sustainability. Managers at the local and state level should maintain oversight to ensure that the program is delivered with fidelity. As the program relies on sustaining inconvenience to encourage parents to immunize their children, any shortcuts taken will undermine its success. BioMed Central 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7379806/ /pubmed/32703208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05550-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lillvis, Denise F.
Willison, Charley
Noyes, Katia
Normalizing inconvenience to promote childhood vaccination: a qualitative implementation evaluation of a novel Michigan program
title Normalizing inconvenience to promote childhood vaccination: a qualitative implementation evaluation of a novel Michigan program
title_full Normalizing inconvenience to promote childhood vaccination: a qualitative implementation evaluation of a novel Michigan program
title_fullStr Normalizing inconvenience to promote childhood vaccination: a qualitative implementation evaluation of a novel Michigan program
title_full_unstemmed Normalizing inconvenience to promote childhood vaccination: a qualitative implementation evaluation of a novel Michigan program
title_short Normalizing inconvenience to promote childhood vaccination: a qualitative implementation evaluation of a novel Michigan program
title_sort normalizing inconvenience to promote childhood vaccination: a qualitative implementation evaluation of a novel michigan program
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32703208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05550-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lillvisdenisef normalizinginconveniencetopromotechildhoodvaccinationaqualitativeimplementationevaluationofanovelmichiganprogram
AT willisoncharley normalizinginconveniencetopromotechildhoodvaccinationaqualitativeimplementationevaluationofanovelmichiganprogram
AT noyeskatia normalizinginconveniencetopromotechildhoodvaccinationaqualitativeimplementationevaluationofanovelmichiganprogram