Cargando…

Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach

BACKGROUND, CONTEXT AND PURPOSE: In spite of the mixed evidence for their impact, survivorship Care Plans (SCPs) are recommended to enhance quality of care for cancer survivors. Data on the feasibility of SCPs in bladder cancer (BC) is sparse. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study describes the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Cheryl T., Mohamed, Nihal E., Pisipati, Sailaja, Shah, Qainat N., Agarwal, Piyush K., Downs, Tracy M., Droller, Michael, Gilbert, Scott M., Goltz, Heather H., Hall, Simon J., Hendawi, Mohamed, Hoffman-Censits, Jean, O’Donnell, Michael, Kaag, Matthew, Karsh, Lawrence I., Kassouf, Wassim, Quale, Diane Z., Sagalowsky, Arthur, Steinberg, Gary D., Latini, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32709234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05533-7
_version_ 1783562727712620544
author Lee, Cheryl T.
Mohamed, Nihal E.
Pisipati, Sailaja
Shah, Qainat N.
Agarwal, Piyush K.
Downs, Tracy M.
Droller, Michael
Gilbert, Scott M.
Goltz, Heather H.
Hall, Simon J.
Hendawi, Mohamed
Hoffman-Censits, Jean
O’Donnell, Michael
Kaag, Matthew
Karsh, Lawrence I.
Kassouf, Wassim
Quale, Diane Z.
Sagalowsky, Arthur
Steinberg, Gary D.
Latini, David M.
author_facet Lee, Cheryl T.
Mohamed, Nihal E.
Pisipati, Sailaja
Shah, Qainat N.
Agarwal, Piyush K.
Downs, Tracy M.
Droller, Michael
Gilbert, Scott M.
Goltz, Heather H.
Hall, Simon J.
Hendawi, Mohamed
Hoffman-Censits, Jean
O’Donnell, Michael
Kaag, Matthew
Karsh, Lawrence I.
Kassouf, Wassim
Quale, Diane Z.
Sagalowsky, Arthur
Steinberg, Gary D.
Latini, David M.
author_sort Lee, Cheryl T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND, CONTEXT AND PURPOSE: In spite of the mixed evidence for their impact, survivorship Care Plans (SCPs) are recommended to enhance quality of care for cancer survivors. Data on the feasibility of SCPs in bladder cancer (BC) is sparse. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study describes the iterative development, acceptability and feasibility of BC specific SCP (BC-SCP) in clinical settings. METHODS: In Phase I, we developed the BC-SCP. In Phase II, we conducted four focus groups with 19 patients and 15 providers to examine its acceptability and usability challenges. Data analyses using the Atlas.ti program, informed refinement of the BC-SCP. In Phase III, we conducted feasibility testing of the refined BC-SCP with 18 providers from 12 health-centers. An encounter survey was completed after each assessment to examine the feasibility of the BC-SCP. Chi-square and Fisher Exact tests were used for comparative analyses. RESULTS: During phase I, we observed high patient and provider acceptability of the BC-SCP and substantial engagement in improving its content, design, and structure. In Phase II, providers completed 59 BC-SCPs. Mean time for BC-SCP completion was 12.3 min. Providers reported that BC-SCP content was clear, did not hamper clinic flow and was readily completed with easy-to-access information. Comparative analyses to examine differences in SCP completion time by patient clinico-demographic characteristics and provider type revealed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Our BC-SCP has clinical relevance, and can be used in an active practice setting. However, considerable progress will be necessary to achieve implementation of and sharing the BC-SCP with patients and care providers, particularly within the electronic medical record. In summary, BC-SCPs are essential to improve the follow up care of BC survivors. Clinical resources are required to ensure appropriate implementation of BC-SCPs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study HUM00056082.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7379822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73798222020-08-04 Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach Lee, Cheryl T. Mohamed, Nihal E. Pisipati, Sailaja Shah, Qainat N. Agarwal, Piyush K. Downs, Tracy M. Droller, Michael Gilbert, Scott M. Goltz, Heather H. Hall, Simon J. Hendawi, Mohamed Hoffman-Censits, Jean O’Donnell, Michael Kaag, Matthew Karsh, Lawrence I. Kassouf, Wassim Quale, Diane Z. Sagalowsky, Arthur Steinberg, Gary D. Latini, David M. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND, CONTEXT AND PURPOSE: In spite of the mixed evidence for their impact, survivorship Care Plans (SCPs) are recommended to enhance quality of care for cancer survivors. Data on the feasibility of SCPs in bladder cancer (BC) is sparse. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study describes the iterative development, acceptability and feasibility of BC specific SCP (BC-SCP) in clinical settings. METHODS: In Phase I, we developed the BC-SCP. In Phase II, we conducted four focus groups with 19 patients and 15 providers to examine its acceptability and usability challenges. Data analyses using the Atlas.ti program, informed refinement of the BC-SCP. In Phase III, we conducted feasibility testing of the refined BC-SCP with 18 providers from 12 health-centers. An encounter survey was completed after each assessment to examine the feasibility of the BC-SCP. Chi-square and Fisher Exact tests were used for comparative analyses. RESULTS: During phase I, we observed high patient and provider acceptability of the BC-SCP and substantial engagement in improving its content, design, and structure. In Phase II, providers completed 59 BC-SCPs. Mean time for BC-SCP completion was 12.3 min. Providers reported that BC-SCP content was clear, did not hamper clinic flow and was readily completed with easy-to-access information. Comparative analyses to examine differences in SCP completion time by patient clinico-demographic characteristics and provider type revealed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Our BC-SCP has clinical relevance, and can be used in an active practice setting. However, considerable progress will be necessary to achieve implementation of and sharing the BC-SCP with patients and care providers, particularly within the electronic medical record. In summary, BC-SCPs are essential to improve the follow up care of BC survivors. Clinical resources are required to ensure appropriate implementation of BC-SCPs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study HUM00056082. BioMed Central 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7379822/ /pubmed/32709234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05533-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Cheryl T.
Mohamed, Nihal E.
Pisipati, Sailaja
Shah, Qainat N.
Agarwal, Piyush K.
Downs, Tracy M.
Droller, Michael
Gilbert, Scott M.
Goltz, Heather H.
Hall, Simon J.
Hendawi, Mohamed
Hoffman-Censits, Jean
O’Donnell, Michael
Kaag, Matthew
Karsh, Lawrence I.
Kassouf, Wassim
Quale, Diane Z.
Sagalowsky, Arthur
Steinberg, Gary D.
Latini, David M.
Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach
title Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach
title_full Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach
title_fullStr Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach
title_full_unstemmed Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach
title_short Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach
title_sort development and evaluation of a bladder cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32709234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05533-7
work_keys_str_mv AT leecherylt developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT mohamednihale developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT pisipatisailaja developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT shahqainatn developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT agarwalpiyushk developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT downstracym developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT drollermichael developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT gilbertscottm developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT goltzheatherh developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT hallsimonj developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT hendawimohamed developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT hoffmancensitsjean developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT odonnellmichael developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT kaagmatthew developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT karshlawrencei developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT kassoufwassim developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT qualedianez developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT sagalowskyarthur developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT steinberggaryd developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach
AT latinidavidm developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach