Cargando…
Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach
BACKGROUND, CONTEXT AND PURPOSE: In spite of the mixed evidence for their impact, survivorship Care Plans (SCPs) are recommended to enhance quality of care for cancer survivors. Data on the feasibility of SCPs in bladder cancer (BC) is sparse. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study describes the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32709234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05533-7 |
_version_ | 1783562727712620544 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Cheryl T. Mohamed, Nihal E. Pisipati, Sailaja Shah, Qainat N. Agarwal, Piyush K. Downs, Tracy M. Droller, Michael Gilbert, Scott M. Goltz, Heather H. Hall, Simon J. Hendawi, Mohamed Hoffman-Censits, Jean O’Donnell, Michael Kaag, Matthew Karsh, Lawrence I. Kassouf, Wassim Quale, Diane Z. Sagalowsky, Arthur Steinberg, Gary D. Latini, David M. |
author_facet | Lee, Cheryl T. Mohamed, Nihal E. Pisipati, Sailaja Shah, Qainat N. Agarwal, Piyush K. Downs, Tracy M. Droller, Michael Gilbert, Scott M. Goltz, Heather H. Hall, Simon J. Hendawi, Mohamed Hoffman-Censits, Jean O’Donnell, Michael Kaag, Matthew Karsh, Lawrence I. Kassouf, Wassim Quale, Diane Z. Sagalowsky, Arthur Steinberg, Gary D. Latini, David M. |
author_sort | Lee, Cheryl T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND, CONTEXT AND PURPOSE: In spite of the mixed evidence for their impact, survivorship Care Plans (SCPs) are recommended to enhance quality of care for cancer survivors. Data on the feasibility of SCPs in bladder cancer (BC) is sparse. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study describes the iterative development, acceptability and feasibility of BC specific SCP (BC-SCP) in clinical settings. METHODS: In Phase I, we developed the BC-SCP. In Phase II, we conducted four focus groups with 19 patients and 15 providers to examine its acceptability and usability challenges. Data analyses using the Atlas.ti program, informed refinement of the BC-SCP. In Phase III, we conducted feasibility testing of the refined BC-SCP with 18 providers from 12 health-centers. An encounter survey was completed after each assessment to examine the feasibility of the BC-SCP. Chi-square and Fisher Exact tests were used for comparative analyses. RESULTS: During phase I, we observed high patient and provider acceptability of the BC-SCP and substantial engagement in improving its content, design, and structure. In Phase II, providers completed 59 BC-SCPs. Mean time for BC-SCP completion was 12.3 min. Providers reported that BC-SCP content was clear, did not hamper clinic flow and was readily completed with easy-to-access information. Comparative analyses to examine differences in SCP completion time by patient clinico-demographic characteristics and provider type revealed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Our BC-SCP has clinical relevance, and can be used in an active practice setting. However, considerable progress will be necessary to achieve implementation of and sharing the BC-SCP with patients and care providers, particularly within the electronic medical record. In summary, BC-SCPs are essential to improve the follow up care of BC survivors. Clinical resources are required to ensure appropriate implementation of BC-SCPs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study HUM00056082. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7379822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73798222020-08-04 Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach Lee, Cheryl T. Mohamed, Nihal E. Pisipati, Sailaja Shah, Qainat N. Agarwal, Piyush K. Downs, Tracy M. Droller, Michael Gilbert, Scott M. Goltz, Heather H. Hall, Simon J. Hendawi, Mohamed Hoffman-Censits, Jean O’Donnell, Michael Kaag, Matthew Karsh, Lawrence I. Kassouf, Wassim Quale, Diane Z. Sagalowsky, Arthur Steinberg, Gary D. Latini, David M. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND, CONTEXT AND PURPOSE: In spite of the mixed evidence for their impact, survivorship Care Plans (SCPs) are recommended to enhance quality of care for cancer survivors. Data on the feasibility of SCPs in bladder cancer (BC) is sparse. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study describes the iterative development, acceptability and feasibility of BC specific SCP (BC-SCP) in clinical settings. METHODS: In Phase I, we developed the BC-SCP. In Phase II, we conducted four focus groups with 19 patients and 15 providers to examine its acceptability and usability challenges. Data analyses using the Atlas.ti program, informed refinement of the BC-SCP. In Phase III, we conducted feasibility testing of the refined BC-SCP with 18 providers from 12 health-centers. An encounter survey was completed after each assessment to examine the feasibility of the BC-SCP. Chi-square and Fisher Exact tests were used for comparative analyses. RESULTS: During phase I, we observed high patient and provider acceptability of the BC-SCP and substantial engagement in improving its content, design, and structure. In Phase II, providers completed 59 BC-SCPs. Mean time for BC-SCP completion was 12.3 min. Providers reported that BC-SCP content was clear, did not hamper clinic flow and was readily completed with easy-to-access information. Comparative analyses to examine differences in SCP completion time by patient clinico-demographic characteristics and provider type revealed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Our BC-SCP has clinical relevance, and can be used in an active practice setting. However, considerable progress will be necessary to achieve implementation of and sharing the BC-SCP with patients and care providers, particularly within the electronic medical record. In summary, BC-SCPs are essential to improve the follow up care of BC survivors. Clinical resources are required to ensure appropriate implementation of BC-SCPs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study HUM00056082. BioMed Central 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7379822/ /pubmed/32709234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05533-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Cheryl T. Mohamed, Nihal E. Pisipati, Sailaja Shah, Qainat N. Agarwal, Piyush K. Downs, Tracy M. Droller, Michael Gilbert, Scott M. Goltz, Heather H. Hall, Simon J. Hendawi, Mohamed Hoffman-Censits, Jean O’Donnell, Michael Kaag, Matthew Karsh, Lawrence I. Kassouf, Wassim Quale, Diane Z. Sagalowsky, Arthur Steinberg, Gary D. Latini, David M. Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach |
title | Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach |
title_full | Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach |
title_fullStr | Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach |
title_short | Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach |
title_sort | development and evaluation of a bladder cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32709234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05533-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leecherylt developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT mohamednihale developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT pisipatisailaja developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT shahqainatn developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT agarwalpiyushk developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT downstracym developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT drollermichael developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT gilbertscottm developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT goltzheatherh developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT hallsimonj developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT hendawimohamed developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT hoffmancensitsjean developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT odonnellmichael developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT kaagmatthew developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT karshlawrencei developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT kassoufwassim developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT qualedianez developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT sagalowskyarthur developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT steinberggaryd developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach AT latinidavidm developmentandevaluationofabladdercancerspecificsurvivorshipcareplanbypatientsandclinicalcareprovidersamultimethodsapproach |