Cargando…

A Clinical Entity Often Missed—Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Children

Background: Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome (SRUS) was a relatively uncommon and easily misdiagnosed clinical entity in children. The diagnosis of this condition was often delayed due to lack of clinical suspicion. Only case series were available and no definitive treatment was postulated. Here, we s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thirumal, P., Sumathi, B., Nirmala, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32766189
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00396
_version_ 1783562746356301824
author Thirumal, P.
Sumathi, B.
Nirmala, D.
author_facet Thirumal, P.
Sumathi, B.
Nirmala, D.
author_sort Thirumal, P.
collection PubMed
description Background: Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome (SRUS) was a relatively uncommon and easily misdiagnosed clinical entity in children. The diagnosis of this condition was often delayed due to lack of clinical suspicion. Only case series were available and no definitive treatment was postulated. Here, we share our experience of SRUS in our institute and reviewed the literature published so far. Aim: To study the clinical profile and treatment response of Solitary Rectal ulcer Syndrome in Children (SRUS). Materials: The clinical profile and 1 year follow up response of the diagnosed cases of SRUS over a period of 5 years was retrospectively collected from medical record department. Results: The median age of presentation among 24 children was 8 years with majority (75%) above 5 years. All children presented with intermittent rectal bleeding with median duration of 5.5 months. The other presenting symptoms documented were hard stool (79%), mucorrhea (70%), and abdominal pain (58%). One child presented with rectal prolapse. On colonoscopy, 46% had single ulcer while another 46% had multiple ulcers and 8% had polypoidal lesion. All lesions were within distal rectum and had characteristic histological pattern. All children were treated with conventional treatment like dietary fibers and laxatives along with toilet training. About 75% children attained remission and 25% had relapse but responded with corticosteroid enema. None required surgery. Conclusion: Conventional treatments itself induce and maintain remission in most of SRUS patients if treatment is instituted at the earliest. Thus, early suspicion and diagnosis is needed to achieve remission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7379901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73799012020-08-05 A Clinical Entity Often Missed—Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Children Thirumal, P. Sumathi, B. Nirmala, D. Front Pediatr Pediatrics Background: Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome (SRUS) was a relatively uncommon and easily misdiagnosed clinical entity in children. The diagnosis of this condition was often delayed due to lack of clinical suspicion. Only case series were available and no definitive treatment was postulated. Here, we share our experience of SRUS in our institute and reviewed the literature published so far. Aim: To study the clinical profile and treatment response of Solitary Rectal ulcer Syndrome in Children (SRUS). Materials: The clinical profile and 1 year follow up response of the diagnosed cases of SRUS over a period of 5 years was retrospectively collected from medical record department. Results: The median age of presentation among 24 children was 8 years with majority (75%) above 5 years. All children presented with intermittent rectal bleeding with median duration of 5.5 months. The other presenting symptoms documented were hard stool (79%), mucorrhea (70%), and abdominal pain (58%). One child presented with rectal prolapse. On colonoscopy, 46% had single ulcer while another 46% had multiple ulcers and 8% had polypoidal lesion. All lesions were within distal rectum and had characteristic histological pattern. All children were treated with conventional treatment like dietary fibers and laxatives along with toilet training. About 75% children attained remission and 25% had relapse but responded with corticosteroid enema. None required surgery. Conclusion: Conventional treatments itself induce and maintain remission in most of SRUS patients if treatment is instituted at the earliest. Thus, early suspicion and diagnosis is needed to achieve remission. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7379901/ /pubmed/32766189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00396 Text en Copyright © 2020 Thirumal, Sumathi and Nirmala. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Thirumal, P.
Sumathi, B.
Nirmala, D.
A Clinical Entity Often Missed—Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Children
title A Clinical Entity Often Missed—Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Children
title_full A Clinical Entity Often Missed—Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Children
title_fullStr A Clinical Entity Often Missed—Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Children
title_full_unstemmed A Clinical Entity Often Missed—Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Children
title_short A Clinical Entity Often Missed—Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Children
title_sort clinical entity often missed—solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32766189
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00396
work_keys_str_mv AT thirumalp aclinicalentityoftenmissedsolitaryrectalulcersyndromeinchildren
AT sumathib aclinicalentityoftenmissedsolitaryrectalulcersyndromeinchildren
AT nirmalad aclinicalentityoftenmissedsolitaryrectalulcersyndromeinchildren
AT thirumalp clinicalentityoftenmissedsolitaryrectalulcersyndromeinchildren
AT sumathib clinicalentityoftenmissedsolitaryrectalulcersyndromeinchildren
AT nirmalad clinicalentityoftenmissedsolitaryrectalulcersyndromeinchildren