Cargando…

Granulocyte–macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) as a therapeutic target in psoriasis: randomized, controlled investigation using namilumab, a specific human anti‐GM‐CSF monoclonal antibody

BACKGROUND: The relevance of granulocyte–macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) in the management of psoriasis has not been studied previously. GM‐CSF is important in the initiation and maintenance of chronic inflammatory processes. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical use of GM‐CSF neutra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papp, K.A., Gooderham, M., Jenkins, R., Vender, R., Szepietowski, J.C., Wagner, T., Hunt, B., Souberbielle, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30207587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17195
_version_ 1783562760195407872
author Papp, K.A.
Gooderham, M.
Jenkins, R.
Vender, R.
Szepietowski, J.C.
Wagner, T.
Hunt, B.
Souberbielle, B.
author_facet Papp, K.A.
Gooderham, M.
Jenkins, R.
Vender, R.
Szepietowski, J.C.
Wagner, T.
Hunt, B.
Souberbielle, B.
author_sort Papp, K.A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The relevance of granulocyte–macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) in the management of psoriasis has not been studied previously. GM‐CSF is important in the initiation and maintenance of chronic inflammatory processes. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical use of GM‐CSF neutralization by evaluating the efficacy and safety of namilumab (AMG203), a monoclonal antibody GM‐CSF inhibitor, in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: A phase II, multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, dose‐finding, proof‐of‐concept study (NEPTUNE) was conducted. Four doses of namilumab (20, 50, 80 and 150 mg, via subcutaneous injection) were compared with placebo. Assessment of the primary end point – the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75 treatment response) – was performed at week 12. Exploratory investigation at the tissue level was conducted in a subset of the overall study population. The trial was registered with the number NCT02129777. RESULTS: In total, 122 patients were enrolled and 106 (86·9%) completed the double‐blind treatment; 16 (13·1%) prematurely discontinued study medication. Serum concentration–time profiles were as expected for subcutaneous delivery of an IgG1 monoclonal antibody, and exposure increased proportionally with dose elevation. The number of patients showing PASI 75 treatment response at week 12 was low in all groups; no significant difference was recorded in this end point between placebo and any namilumab group. Similar outcomes were recorded for other clinical study end points. Moreover, no significant treatment‐related changes from baseline were observed in laboratory investigations of cell types or subpopulations, or cytokines relevant to inflammatory pathways in psoriasis. CONCLUSIONS: GM‐CSF blockade is not critical for suppression of key inflammatory pathways underlying psoriasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7379964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73799642020-07-27 Granulocyte–macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) as a therapeutic target in psoriasis: randomized, controlled investigation using namilumab, a specific human anti‐GM‐CSF monoclonal antibody Papp, K.A. Gooderham, M. Jenkins, R. Vender, R. Szepietowski, J.C. Wagner, T. Hunt, B. Souberbielle, B. Br J Dermatol Original Articles BACKGROUND: The relevance of granulocyte–macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) in the management of psoriasis has not been studied previously. GM‐CSF is important in the initiation and maintenance of chronic inflammatory processes. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical use of GM‐CSF neutralization by evaluating the efficacy and safety of namilumab (AMG203), a monoclonal antibody GM‐CSF inhibitor, in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: A phase II, multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, dose‐finding, proof‐of‐concept study (NEPTUNE) was conducted. Four doses of namilumab (20, 50, 80 and 150 mg, via subcutaneous injection) were compared with placebo. Assessment of the primary end point – the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75 treatment response) – was performed at week 12. Exploratory investigation at the tissue level was conducted in a subset of the overall study population. The trial was registered with the number NCT02129777. RESULTS: In total, 122 patients were enrolled and 106 (86·9%) completed the double‐blind treatment; 16 (13·1%) prematurely discontinued study medication. Serum concentration–time profiles were as expected for subcutaneous delivery of an IgG1 monoclonal antibody, and exposure increased proportionally with dose elevation. The number of patients showing PASI 75 treatment response at week 12 was low in all groups; no significant difference was recorded in this end point between placebo and any namilumab group. Similar outcomes were recorded for other clinical study end points. Moreover, no significant treatment‐related changes from baseline were observed in laboratory investigations of cell types or subpopulations, or cytokines relevant to inflammatory pathways in psoriasis. CONCLUSIONS: GM‐CSF blockade is not critical for suppression of key inflammatory pathways underlying psoriasis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-02 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7379964/ /pubmed/30207587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17195 Text en © 2018 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Papp, K.A.
Gooderham, M.
Jenkins, R.
Vender, R.
Szepietowski, J.C.
Wagner, T.
Hunt, B.
Souberbielle, B.
Granulocyte–macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) as a therapeutic target in psoriasis: randomized, controlled investigation using namilumab, a specific human anti‐GM‐CSF monoclonal antibody
title Granulocyte–macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) as a therapeutic target in psoriasis: randomized, controlled investigation using namilumab, a specific human anti‐GM‐CSF monoclonal antibody
title_full Granulocyte–macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) as a therapeutic target in psoriasis: randomized, controlled investigation using namilumab, a specific human anti‐GM‐CSF monoclonal antibody
title_fullStr Granulocyte–macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) as a therapeutic target in psoriasis: randomized, controlled investigation using namilumab, a specific human anti‐GM‐CSF monoclonal antibody
title_full_unstemmed Granulocyte–macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) as a therapeutic target in psoriasis: randomized, controlled investigation using namilumab, a specific human anti‐GM‐CSF monoclonal antibody
title_short Granulocyte–macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) as a therapeutic target in psoriasis: randomized, controlled investigation using namilumab, a specific human anti‐GM‐CSF monoclonal antibody
title_sort granulocyte–macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (gm‐csf) as a therapeutic target in psoriasis: randomized, controlled investigation using namilumab, a specific human anti‐gm‐csf monoclonal antibody
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30207587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17195
work_keys_str_mv AT pappka granulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfasatherapeutictargetinpsoriasisrandomizedcontrolledinvestigationusingnamilumabaspecifichumanantigmcsfmonoclonalantibody
AT gooderhamm granulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfasatherapeutictargetinpsoriasisrandomizedcontrolledinvestigationusingnamilumabaspecifichumanantigmcsfmonoclonalantibody
AT jenkinsr granulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfasatherapeutictargetinpsoriasisrandomizedcontrolledinvestigationusingnamilumabaspecifichumanantigmcsfmonoclonalantibody
AT venderr granulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfasatherapeutictargetinpsoriasisrandomizedcontrolledinvestigationusingnamilumabaspecifichumanantigmcsfmonoclonalantibody
AT szepietowskijc granulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfasatherapeutictargetinpsoriasisrandomizedcontrolledinvestigationusingnamilumabaspecifichumanantigmcsfmonoclonalantibody
AT wagnert granulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfasatherapeutictargetinpsoriasisrandomizedcontrolledinvestigationusingnamilumabaspecifichumanantigmcsfmonoclonalantibody
AT huntb granulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfasatherapeutictargetinpsoriasisrandomizedcontrolledinvestigationusingnamilumabaspecifichumanantigmcsfmonoclonalantibody
AT souberbielleb granulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfasatherapeutictargetinpsoriasisrandomizedcontrolledinvestigationusingnamilumabaspecifichumanantigmcsfmonoclonalantibody
AT granulocytemacrophagecolonystimulatingfactorgmcsfasatherapeutictargetinpsoriasisrandomizedcontrolledinvestigationusingnamilumabaspecifichumanantigmcsfmonoclonalantibody