Cargando…

Improved Method for Estimating Reaction Rates During Push‐Pull Tests

The breakthrough curve obtained from a single‐well push‐pull test can be adjusted to account for dilution of the injection fluid in the aquifer fluid. The dilution‐adjusted breakthrough curve can be analyzed to estimate the reaction rate of a solute. The conventional dilution‐adjusted method assumes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paradis, Charles J., Dixon, Emma R., Lui, Lauren M., Arkin, Adam P., Parker, Jack C., Istok, Jonathan D., Perfect, Edmund, McKay, Larry D., Hazen, Terry C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29656383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12770
_version_ 1783562767450505216
author Paradis, Charles J.
Dixon, Emma R.
Lui, Lauren M.
Arkin, Adam P.
Parker, Jack C.
Istok, Jonathan D.
Perfect, Edmund
McKay, Larry D.
Hazen, Terry C.
author_facet Paradis, Charles J.
Dixon, Emma R.
Lui, Lauren M.
Arkin, Adam P.
Parker, Jack C.
Istok, Jonathan D.
Perfect, Edmund
McKay, Larry D.
Hazen, Terry C.
author_sort Paradis, Charles J.
collection PubMed
description The breakthrough curve obtained from a single‐well push‐pull test can be adjusted to account for dilution of the injection fluid in the aquifer fluid. The dilution‐adjusted breakthrough curve can be analyzed to estimate the reaction rate of a solute. The conventional dilution‐adjusted method assumes that the ratios of the concentrations of the nonreactive and reactive solutes in the injection fluid vs. the aquifer fluid are equal. If this assumption is invalid, the conventional method will generate inaccurate breakthrough curves and may lead to erroneous conclusions regarding the reactivity of a solute. In this study, a new method that generates a dilution‐adjusted breakthrough curve was theoretically developed to account for any possible combination of nonreactive and reactive solute concentrations in the injection and aquifer fluids. The newly developed method was applied to a field‐based data set and was shown to generate more accurate dilution‐adjusted breakthrough curves. The improved dilution‐adjusted method presented here is simple, makes no assumptions regarding the concentrations of the nonreactive and reactive solutes in the injection and aquifer fluids, and easily allows for estimating reaction rates during push‐pull tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7379995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73799952020-07-27 Improved Method for Estimating Reaction Rates During Push‐Pull Tests Paradis, Charles J. Dixon, Emma R. Lui, Lauren M. Arkin, Adam P. Parker, Jack C. Istok, Jonathan D. Perfect, Edmund McKay, Larry D. Hazen, Terry C. Ground Water Research Papers/ The breakthrough curve obtained from a single‐well push‐pull test can be adjusted to account for dilution of the injection fluid in the aquifer fluid. The dilution‐adjusted breakthrough curve can be analyzed to estimate the reaction rate of a solute. The conventional dilution‐adjusted method assumes that the ratios of the concentrations of the nonreactive and reactive solutes in the injection fluid vs. the aquifer fluid are equal. If this assumption is invalid, the conventional method will generate inaccurate breakthrough curves and may lead to erroneous conclusions regarding the reactivity of a solute. In this study, a new method that generates a dilution‐adjusted breakthrough curve was theoretically developed to account for any possible combination of nonreactive and reactive solute concentrations in the injection and aquifer fluids. The newly developed method was applied to a field‐based data set and was shown to generate more accurate dilution‐adjusted breakthrough curves. The improved dilution‐adjusted method presented here is simple, makes no assumptions regarding the concentrations of the nonreactive and reactive solutes in the injection and aquifer fluids, and easily allows for estimating reaction rates during push‐pull tests. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2018-04-30 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC7379995/ /pubmed/29656383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12770 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Groundwater published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of National Ground Water Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers/
Paradis, Charles J.
Dixon, Emma R.
Lui, Lauren M.
Arkin, Adam P.
Parker, Jack C.
Istok, Jonathan D.
Perfect, Edmund
McKay, Larry D.
Hazen, Terry C.
Improved Method for Estimating Reaction Rates During Push‐Pull Tests
title Improved Method for Estimating Reaction Rates During Push‐Pull Tests
title_full Improved Method for Estimating Reaction Rates During Push‐Pull Tests
title_fullStr Improved Method for Estimating Reaction Rates During Push‐Pull Tests
title_full_unstemmed Improved Method for Estimating Reaction Rates During Push‐Pull Tests
title_short Improved Method for Estimating Reaction Rates During Push‐Pull Tests
title_sort improved method for estimating reaction rates during push‐pull tests
topic Research Papers/
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29656383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12770
work_keys_str_mv AT paradischarlesj improvedmethodforestimatingreactionratesduringpushpulltests
AT dixonemmar improvedmethodforestimatingreactionratesduringpushpulltests
AT luilaurenm improvedmethodforestimatingreactionratesduringpushpulltests
AT arkinadamp improvedmethodforestimatingreactionratesduringpushpulltests
AT parkerjackc improvedmethodforestimatingreactionratesduringpushpulltests
AT istokjonathand improvedmethodforestimatingreactionratesduringpushpulltests
AT perfectedmund improvedmethodforestimatingreactionratesduringpushpulltests
AT mckaylarryd improvedmethodforestimatingreactionratesduringpushpulltests
AT hazenterryc improvedmethodforestimatingreactionratesduringpushpulltests