Cargando…

Online decision support for persons having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners during reproductive decision‐making

A nationwide pretest–posttest study was conducted in all clinical genetic centres in the Netherlands, to evaluate the effects of an online decision aid to support persons who have a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners in making an informed decision regarding reproductive options. Mai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reumkens, Kelly, Tummers, Marly H. E., Gietel‐Habets, Joyce J. G., van Kuijk, Sander M. J., Aalfs, Cora M., van Asperen, Christi J., Ausems, Margreet G. E. M., Collée, Margriet, Dommering, Charlotte J., Kets, C. Marleen, van der Kolk, Lizet E., Oosterwijk, Jan C., Tjan‐Heijnen, Vivianne C. G., van der Weijden, Trudy, de Die‐Smulders, Christine E. M., van Osch, Liesbeth A. D. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30629779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1056
_version_ 1783562774020882432
author Reumkens, Kelly
Tummers, Marly H. E.
Gietel‐Habets, Joyce J. G.
van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
Aalfs, Cora M.
van Asperen, Christi J.
Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
Collée, Margriet
Dommering, Charlotte J.
Kets, C. Marleen
van der Kolk, Lizet E.
Oosterwijk, Jan C.
Tjan‐Heijnen, Vivianne C. G.
van der Weijden, Trudy
de Die‐Smulders, Christine E. M.
van Osch, Liesbeth A. D. M.
author_facet Reumkens, Kelly
Tummers, Marly H. E.
Gietel‐Habets, Joyce J. G.
van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
Aalfs, Cora M.
van Asperen, Christi J.
Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
Collée, Margriet
Dommering, Charlotte J.
Kets, C. Marleen
van der Kolk, Lizet E.
Oosterwijk, Jan C.
Tjan‐Heijnen, Vivianne C. G.
van der Weijden, Trudy
de Die‐Smulders, Christine E. M.
van Osch, Liesbeth A. D. M.
author_sort Reumkens, Kelly
collection PubMed
description A nationwide pretest–posttest study was conducted in all clinical genetic centres in the Netherlands, to evaluate the effects of an online decision aid to support persons who have a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners in making an informed decision regarding reproductive options. Main outcomes (decisional conflict, knowledge, realistic expectations, level of deliberation, and decision self‐efficacy) were measured before use (T0), immediately after use (T1), and at 2 weeks (T2) after use of the decision aid. Paired sample t tests were used to compute differences between the first and subsequent measurements. T0–T1 and T0–T2 comparisons indicate a significant reduction in mean decisional conflict scores with stronger effects for participants with high baseline decisional conflict. Furthermore, use of the decision aid resulted in increased knowledge levels and improved realistic expectations. Level of deliberation only increased for participants with lower baseline levels of deliberation. Decision self‐efficacy increased for those with low baseline scores, whereas those with high baseline scores showed a reduction at T2. It can be concluded that use of the decision aid resulted in several positive outcomes indicative of informed decision‐making. The decision aid is an appropriate and highly appreciated tool to be used in addition to reproductive counseling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7380023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73800232020-07-27 Online decision support for persons having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners during reproductive decision‐making Reumkens, Kelly Tummers, Marly H. E. Gietel‐Habets, Joyce J. G. van Kuijk, Sander M. J. Aalfs, Cora M. van Asperen, Christi J. Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. Collée, Margriet Dommering, Charlotte J. Kets, C. Marleen van der Kolk, Lizet E. Oosterwijk, Jan C. Tjan‐Heijnen, Vivianne C. G. van der Weijden, Trudy de Die‐Smulders, Christine E. M. van Osch, Liesbeth A. D. M. J Genet Couns Original Articles A nationwide pretest–posttest study was conducted in all clinical genetic centres in the Netherlands, to evaluate the effects of an online decision aid to support persons who have a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners in making an informed decision regarding reproductive options. Main outcomes (decisional conflict, knowledge, realistic expectations, level of deliberation, and decision self‐efficacy) were measured before use (T0), immediately after use (T1), and at 2 weeks (T2) after use of the decision aid. Paired sample t tests were used to compute differences between the first and subsequent measurements. T0–T1 and T0–T2 comparisons indicate a significant reduction in mean decisional conflict scores with stronger effects for participants with high baseline decisional conflict. Furthermore, use of the decision aid resulted in increased knowledge levels and improved realistic expectations. Level of deliberation only increased for participants with lower baseline levels of deliberation. Decision self‐efficacy increased for those with low baseline scores, whereas those with high baseline scores showed a reduction at T2. It can be concluded that use of the decision aid resulted in several positive outcomes indicative of informed decision‐making. The decision aid is an appropriate and highly appreciated tool to be used in addition to reproductive counseling. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-21 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7380023/ /pubmed/30629779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1056 Text en © 2018 The Authors Journal of Genetic Counseling published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of National Society of Genetic Counselors This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Reumkens, Kelly
Tummers, Marly H. E.
Gietel‐Habets, Joyce J. G.
van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
Aalfs, Cora M.
van Asperen, Christi J.
Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
Collée, Margriet
Dommering, Charlotte J.
Kets, C. Marleen
van der Kolk, Lizet E.
Oosterwijk, Jan C.
Tjan‐Heijnen, Vivianne C. G.
van der Weijden, Trudy
de Die‐Smulders, Christine E. M.
van Osch, Liesbeth A. D. M.
Online decision support for persons having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners during reproductive decision‐making
title Online decision support for persons having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners during reproductive decision‐making
title_full Online decision support for persons having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners during reproductive decision‐making
title_fullStr Online decision support for persons having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners during reproductive decision‐making
title_full_unstemmed Online decision support for persons having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners during reproductive decision‐making
title_short Online decision support for persons having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners during reproductive decision‐making
title_sort online decision support for persons having a genetic predisposition to cancer and their partners during reproductive decision‐making
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30629779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1056
work_keys_str_mv AT reumkenskelly onlinedecisionsupportforpersonshavingageneticpredispositiontocancerandtheirpartnersduringreproductivedecisionmaking
AT tummersmarlyhe onlinedecisionsupportforpersonshavingageneticpredispositiontocancerandtheirpartnersduringreproductivedecisionmaking
AT gietelhabetsjoycejg onlinedecisionsupportforpersonshavingageneticpredispositiontocancerandtheirpartnersduringreproductivedecisionmaking
AT vankuijksandermj onlinedecisionsupportforpersonshavingageneticpredispositiontocancerandtheirpartnersduringreproductivedecisionmaking
AT aalfscoram onlinedecisionsupportforpersonshavingageneticpredispositiontocancerandtheirpartnersduringreproductivedecisionmaking
AT vanasperenchristij onlinedecisionsupportforpersonshavingageneticpredispositiontocancerandtheirpartnersduringreproductivedecisionmaking
AT ausemsmargreetgem onlinedecisionsupportforpersonshavingageneticpredispositiontocancerandtheirpartnersduringreproductivedecisionmaking
AT colleemargriet onlinedecisionsupportforpersonshavingageneticpredispositiontocancerandtheirpartnersduringreproductivedecisionmaking
AT dommeringcharlottej onlinedecisionsupportforpersonshavingageneticpredispositiontocancerandtheirpartnersduringreproductivedecisionmaking
AT ketscmarleen onlinedecisionsupportforpersonshavingageneticpredispositiontocancerandtheirpartnersduringreproductivedecisionmaking
AT vanderkolklizete onlinedecisionsupportforpersonshavingageneticpredispositiontocancerandtheirpartnersduringreproductivedecisionmaking
AT oosterwijkjanc onlinedecisionsupportforpersonshavingageneticpredispositiontocancerandtheirpartnersduringreproductivedecisionmaking
AT tjanheijnenviviannecg onlinedecisionsupportforpersonshavingageneticpredispositiontocancerandtheirpartnersduringreproductivedecisionmaking
AT vanderweijdentrudy onlinedecisionsupportforpersonshavingageneticpredispositiontocancerandtheirpartnersduringreproductivedecisionmaking
AT dediesmulderschristineem onlinedecisionsupportforpersonshavingageneticpredispositiontocancerandtheirpartnersduringreproductivedecisionmaking
AT vanoschliesbethadm onlinedecisionsupportforpersonshavingageneticpredispositiontocancerandtheirpartnersduringreproductivedecisionmaking