Cargando…

Collection planning for the next 100 years: What will we commit to save in zoos and aquariums?

The “sustainability crisis” in zoos and aquariums has been a sobering reminder of how limited our resources are for maintaining viable populations of species threatened with extinction. This, combined with increasing concern among the public about the value of zoos and aquariums, suggests that the z...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Powell, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30465724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21453
_version_ 1783562778433290240
author Powell, David M.
author_facet Powell, David M.
author_sort Powell, David M.
collection PubMed
description The “sustainability crisis” in zoos and aquariums has been a sobering reminder of how limited our resources are for maintaining viable populations of species threatened with extinction. This, combined with increasing concern among the public about the value of zoos and aquariums, suggests that the zoological profession should engage in a thorough re‐examination of our guiding principles, philosophies, and practices with regard to collection planning at global, regional, and institutional scales. An analysis of AZA cooperative breeding programs reveals that in order to make these populations viable, many more founders and tens of thousands more spaces for animals, either in existing facilities or new ones, are necessary if we want to maintain all of the species that are covered by cooperative breeding programs currently. Regional zoological associations and their associated cooperative breeding programs must be more strategic and make more scientifically defensible decisions about which species to try and safeguard in zoos and aquariums. This would enable the zoological profession to give society a “Promise List” of species that we will commit to save from total extinction. Developing such a list will require a collaborative, inclusive process that transcends zoological regions. Regional association leaders, zoo & aquarium directors, and curators must make commitments to safeguard the species on the Promise List regardless of other interests. As our profession re‐examines its philosophies and practices and finds ways to increase its capacity to provide refuge for species facing extinction in the wild, it may be possible to expand the Promise List.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7380042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73800422020-07-27 Collection planning for the next 100 years: What will we commit to save in zoos and aquariums? Powell, David M. Zoo Biol Commentary The “sustainability crisis” in zoos and aquariums has been a sobering reminder of how limited our resources are for maintaining viable populations of species threatened with extinction. This, combined with increasing concern among the public about the value of zoos and aquariums, suggests that the zoological profession should engage in a thorough re‐examination of our guiding principles, philosophies, and practices with regard to collection planning at global, regional, and institutional scales. An analysis of AZA cooperative breeding programs reveals that in order to make these populations viable, many more founders and tens of thousands more spaces for animals, either in existing facilities or new ones, are necessary if we want to maintain all of the species that are covered by cooperative breeding programs currently. Regional zoological associations and their associated cooperative breeding programs must be more strategic and make more scientifically defensible decisions about which species to try and safeguard in zoos and aquariums. This would enable the zoological profession to give society a “Promise List” of species that we will commit to save from total extinction. Developing such a list will require a collaborative, inclusive process that transcends zoological regions. Regional association leaders, zoo & aquarium directors, and curators must make commitments to safeguard the species on the Promise List regardless of other interests. As our profession re‐examines its philosophies and practices and finds ways to increase its capacity to provide refuge for species facing extinction in the wild, it may be possible to expand the Promise List. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-22 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC7380042/ /pubmed/30465724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21453 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Zoo Biology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Commentary
Powell, David M.
Collection planning for the next 100 years: What will we commit to save in zoos and aquariums?
title Collection planning for the next 100 years: What will we commit to save in zoos and aquariums?
title_full Collection planning for the next 100 years: What will we commit to save in zoos and aquariums?
title_fullStr Collection planning for the next 100 years: What will we commit to save in zoos and aquariums?
title_full_unstemmed Collection planning for the next 100 years: What will we commit to save in zoos and aquariums?
title_short Collection planning for the next 100 years: What will we commit to save in zoos and aquariums?
title_sort collection planning for the next 100 years: what will we commit to save in zoos and aquariums?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30465724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21453
work_keys_str_mv AT powelldavidm collectionplanningforthenext100yearswhatwillwecommittosaveinzoosandaquariums