Cargando…
A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology
There are an increasing number of children who are dependent on medical technology to sustain their lives. Although significant research on this issue is taking place, the terminology used is variable and the concept of technology dependence is ill-defined. A systematic concept analysis was conducte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32710305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03737-x |
_version_ | 1783562802665881600 |
---|---|
author | Brenner, Maria Alexander, Denise Quirke, Mary Brigid Eustace-Cook, Jessica Leroy, Piet Berry, Jay Healy, Martina Doyle, Carmel Masterson, Kate |
author_facet | Brenner, Maria Alexander, Denise Quirke, Mary Brigid Eustace-Cook, Jessica Leroy, Piet Berry, Jay Healy, Martina Doyle, Carmel Masterson, Kate |
author_sort | Brenner, Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are an increasing number of children who are dependent on medical technology to sustain their lives. Although significant research on this issue is taking place, the terminology used is variable and the concept of technology dependence is ill-defined. A systematic concept analysis was conducted examining the attributes, antecedents, and consequences of the concept of technology dependent, as portrayed in the literature. We found that this concept refers to a wide range of clinical technology to support biological functioning across a dependency continuum, for a range of clinical conditions. It is commonly initiated within a complex biopsychosocial context and has wide ranging sequelae for the child and family, and health and social care delivery. Conclusion: The term technology dependent is increasingly redundant. It objectifies a heterogenous group of children who are assisted by a myriad of technology and who adapt to, and function with, this assistance in numerous ways. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7380164 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73801642020-07-24 A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology Brenner, Maria Alexander, Denise Quirke, Mary Brigid Eustace-Cook, Jessica Leroy, Piet Berry, Jay Healy, Martina Doyle, Carmel Masterson, Kate Eur J Pediatr Review There are an increasing number of children who are dependent on medical technology to sustain their lives. Although significant research on this issue is taking place, the terminology used is variable and the concept of technology dependence is ill-defined. A systematic concept analysis was conducted examining the attributes, antecedents, and consequences of the concept of technology dependent, as portrayed in the literature. We found that this concept refers to a wide range of clinical technology to support biological functioning across a dependency continuum, for a range of clinical conditions. It is commonly initiated within a complex biopsychosocial context and has wide ranging sequelae for the child and family, and health and social care delivery. Conclusion: The term technology dependent is increasingly redundant. It objectifies a heterogenous group of children who are assisted by a myriad of technology and who adapt to, and function with, this assistance in numerous ways. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7380164/ /pubmed/32710305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03737-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Brenner, Maria Alexander, Denise Quirke, Mary Brigid Eustace-Cook, Jessica Leroy, Piet Berry, Jay Healy, Martina Doyle, Carmel Masterson, Kate A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology |
title | A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology |
title_full | A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology |
title_fullStr | A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology |
title_short | A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology |
title_sort | systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32710305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03737-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brennermaria asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT alexanderdenise asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT quirkemarybrigid asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT eustacecookjessica asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT leroypiet asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT berryjay asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT healymartina asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT doylecarmel asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT mastersonkate asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT brennermaria systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT alexanderdenise systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT quirkemarybrigid systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT eustacecookjessica systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT leroypiet systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT berryjay systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT healymartina systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT doylecarmel systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology AT mastersonkate systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology |