Cargando…

A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology

There are an increasing number of children who are dependent on medical technology to sustain their lives. Although significant research on this issue is taking place, the terminology used is variable and the concept of technology dependence is ill-defined. A systematic concept analysis was conducte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brenner, Maria, Alexander, Denise, Quirke, Mary Brigid, Eustace-Cook, Jessica, Leroy, Piet, Berry, Jay, Healy, Martina, Doyle, Carmel, Masterson, Kate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32710305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03737-x
_version_ 1783562802665881600
author Brenner, Maria
Alexander, Denise
Quirke, Mary Brigid
Eustace-Cook, Jessica
Leroy, Piet
Berry, Jay
Healy, Martina
Doyle, Carmel
Masterson, Kate
author_facet Brenner, Maria
Alexander, Denise
Quirke, Mary Brigid
Eustace-Cook, Jessica
Leroy, Piet
Berry, Jay
Healy, Martina
Doyle, Carmel
Masterson, Kate
author_sort Brenner, Maria
collection PubMed
description There are an increasing number of children who are dependent on medical technology to sustain their lives. Although significant research on this issue is taking place, the terminology used is variable and the concept of technology dependence is ill-defined. A systematic concept analysis was conducted examining the attributes, antecedents, and consequences of the concept of technology dependent, as portrayed in the literature. We found that this concept refers to a wide range of clinical technology to support biological functioning across a dependency continuum, for a range of clinical conditions. It is commonly initiated within a complex biopsychosocial context and has wide ranging sequelae for the child and family, and health and social care delivery. Conclusion: The term technology dependent is increasingly redundant. It objectifies a heterogenous group of children who are assisted by a myriad of technology and who adapt to, and function with, this assistance in numerous ways.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7380164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73801642020-07-24 A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology Brenner, Maria Alexander, Denise Quirke, Mary Brigid Eustace-Cook, Jessica Leroy, Piet Berry, Jay Healy, Martina Doyle, Carmel Masterson, Kate Eur J Pediatr Review There are an increasing number of children who are dependent on medical technology to sustain their lives. Although significant research on this issue is taking place, the terminology used is variable and the concept of technology dependence is ill-defined. A systematic concept analysis was conducted examining the attributes, antecedents, and consequences of the concept of technology dependent, as portrayed in the literature. We found that this concept refers to a wide range of clinical technology to support biological functioning across a dependency continuum, for a range of clinical conditions. It is commonly initiated within a complex biopsychosocial context and has wide ranging sequelae for the child and family, and health and social care delivery. Conclusion: The term technology dependent is increasingly redundant. It objectifies a heterogenous group of children who are assisted by a myriad of technology and who adapt to, and function with, this assistance in numerous ways. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7380164/ /pubmed/32710305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03737-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Brenner, Maria
Alexander, Denise
Quirke, Mary Brigid
Eustace-Cook, Jessica
Leroy, Piet
Berry, Jay
Healy, Martina
Doyle, Carmel
Masterson, Kate
A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology
title A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology
title_full A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology
title_fullStr A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology
title_full_unstemmed A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology
title_short A systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology
title_sort systematic concept analysis of ‘technology dependent’: challenging the terminology
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32710305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03737-x
work_keys_str_mv AT brennermaria asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT alexanderdenise asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT quirkemarybrigid asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT eustacecookjessica asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT leroypiet asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT berryjay asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT healymartina asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT doylecarmel asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT mastersonkate asystematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT brennermaria systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT alexanderdenise systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT quirkemarybrigid systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT eustacecookjessica systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT leroypiet systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT berryjay systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT healymartina systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT doylecarmel systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology
AT mastersonkate systematicconceptanalysisoftechnologydependentchallengingtheterminology