Cargando…

Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and CKD

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The accuracy of glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) level for assessment of glycemic control in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is uncertain. This study assessed the accuracy of HbA(1c) level using continuous glucose monitoring. STUDY DESIGN: Diagnostic test study of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Presswala, Lubaina, Hong, Susana, Harris, Yael, Romao, Isabela, Zhang, Meng, Jhaveri, Kenar D., Sakhiya, Vipul, Fishbane, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32734208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2019.07.006
Descripción
Sumario:RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: The accuracy of glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) level for assessment of glycemic control in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is uncertain. This study assessed the accuracy of HbA(1c) level using continuous glucose monitoring. STUDY DESIGN: Diagnostic test study of HbA(1c) and serum fructosamine. The continuous glucose monitor was worn for 14 days. Glucose was measured every 15 minutes (up to 1,344 measurements). Average glucose concentration was calculated for each patient from the patient’s continuous glucose monitor measurements. Linear regression was applied to estimate the relationship between average glucose concentration and HbA(1c) and serum fructosamine levels. The influence of patient characteristics on the relationship between HbA(1c) and average glucose concentrations was examined in a multivariate regression model. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 7-45 mL/min, not receiving dialysis) seen in an academic nephrology clinic. TESTS ANALYZED: The accuracy of HbA(1c) level for assessment of chronic glycemia. A secondary objective was to study serum fructosamine levels. OUTCOMES: The degree of correlation between continuous glucose monitoring–derived average glucose concentration and HbA(1c) level; serum fructosamine level was studied as a secondary outcome. RESULTS: 80 patients wore the continuous glucose monitor for a mean of 12.7 ± 2.9 days. Average glucose concentration of all patients was 151.5 ± 55.7 mg/dL. Mean HbA(1c) level was 7.2% ± 1.5%. HbA(1c) level was highly correlated with average glucose concentration, described by the equation: average glucose concentration = 30.48 × HbA(1c) − 68.48; r = 0.82; P < 0.001. Serum fructosamine level was also significantly correlated with average glucose concentration; r = 0.55; P < 0.001. The strong correlation between average glucose concentration and HbA(1c) level was not affected by the severity of CKD, whereas the performance of serum fructosamine level, in contrast, degraded among patients with more severe CKD. LIMITATIONS: Relatively small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: HbA(1c) is an accurate measure of glycemic status among patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes. This relationship appears to hold true among patients with more severe CKD.