Cargando…

Characteristics of scientific articles on COVID-19 published during the initial 3 months of the pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has been characterized by an unprecedented amount of published scientific articles. The aim of this study is to assess the type of articles published during the first 3 months of the COVID-19 pandemic and to compare them with articles published during 2009 H1N1 swine influenza...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Girolamo, Nicola, Meursinge Reynders, Reint
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32836530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03632-0
_version_ 1783562864717463552
author Di Girolamo, Nicola
Meursinge Reynders, Reint
author_facet Di Girolamo, Nicola
Meursinge Reynders, Reint
author_sort Di Girolamo, Nicola
collection PubMed
description The COVID-19 pandemic has been characterized by an unprecedented amount of published scientific articles. The aim of this study is to assess the type of articles published during the first 3 months of the COVID-19 pandemic and to compare them with articles published during 2009 H1N1 swine influenza pandemic. Two operators independently extracted and assessed all articles on COVID-19 and on H1N1 swine influenza that had an abstract and were indexed in PubMed during the first 3 months of these pandemics. Of the 2482 articles retrieved on COVID-19, 1165 were included. Over half of them were secondary articles (590, 50.6%). Common primary articles were: human medical research (340, 59.1%), in silico studies (182, 31.7%) and in vitro studies (26, 4.5%). Of the human medical research, the vast majority were observational studies and cases series, followed by single case reports and one randomized controlled trial. Secondary articles were mainly reviews, viewpoints and editorials (373, 63.2%). Limitations were reported in 42 out of 1165 abstracts (3.6%), with 10 abstracts reporting actual methodological limitations. In a similar timeframe, there were 223 articles published on the H1N1 pandemic in 2009. During the COVID-19 pandemic there was a higher prevalence of reviews and guidance articles and a lower prevalence of in vitro and animal research studies compared with the H1N1 pandemic. In conclusions, compared to the H1N1 pandemic, the majority of early publications on COVID-19 does not provide new information, possibly diluting the original data published on this disease and consequently slowing down the development of a valid knowledge base on this disease. Also, only a negligible number of published articles reports limitations in the abstracts, hindering a rapid interpretation of their shortcomings. Researchers, peer reviewers, and editors should take action to flatten the curve of secondary articles. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11192-020-03632-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7380499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73804992020-07-24 Characteristics of scientific articles on COVID-19 published during the initial 3 months of the pandemic Di Girolamo, Nicola Meursinge Reynders, Reint Scientometrics Article The COVID-19 pandemic has been characterized by an unprecedented amount of published scientific articles. The aim of this study is to assess the type of articles published during the first 3 months of the COVID-19 pandemic and to compare them with articles published during 2009 H1N1 swine influenza pandemic. Two operators independently extracted and assessed all articles on COVID-19 and on H1N1 swine influenza that had an abstract and were indexed in PubMed during the first 3 months of these pandemics. Of the 2482 articles retrieved on COVID-19, 1165 were included. Over half of them were secondary articles (590, 50.6%). Common primary articles were: human medical research (340, 59.1%), in silico studies (182, 31.7%) and in vitro studies (26, 4.5%). Of the human medical research, the vast majority were observational studies and cases series, followed by single case reports and one randomized controlled trial. Secondary articles were mainly reviews, viewpoints and editorials (373, 63.2%). Limitations were reported in 42 out of 1165 abstracts (3.6%), with 10 abstracts reporting actual methodological limitations. In a similar timeframe, there were 223 articles published on the H1N1 pandemic in 2009. During the COVID-19 pandemic there was a higher prevalence of reviews and guidance articles and a lower prevalence of in vitro and animal research studies compared with the H1N1 pandemic. In conclusions, compared to the H1N1 pandemic, the majority of early publications on COVID-19 does not provide new information, possibly diluting the original data published on this disease and consequently slowing down the development of a valid knowledge base on this disease. Also, only a negligible number of published articles reports limitations in the abstracts, hindering a rapid interpretation of their shortcomings. Researchers, peer reviewers, and editors should take action to flatten the curve of secondary articles. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11192-020-03632-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7380499/ /pubmed/32836530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03632-0 Text en © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Di Girolamo, Nicola
Meursinge Reynders, Reint
Characteristics of scientific articles on COVID-19 published during the initial 3 months of the pandemic
title Characteristics of scientific articles on COVID-19 published during the initial 3 months of the pandemic
title_full Characteristics of scientific articles on COVID-19 published during the initial 3 months of the pandemic
title_fullStr Characteristics of scientific articles on COVID-19 published during the initial 3 months of the pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of scientific articles on COVID-19 published during the initial 3 months of the pandemic
title_short Characteristics of scientific articles on COVID-19 published during the initial 3 months of the pandemic
title_sort characteristics of scientific articles on covid-19 published during the initial 3 months of the pandemic
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32836530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03632-0
work_keys_str_mv AT digirolamonicola characteristicsofscientificarticlesoncovid19publishedduringtheinitial3monthsofthepandemic
AT meursingereyndersreint characteristicsofscientificarticlesoncovid19publishedduringtheinitial3monthsofthepandemic