Cargando…
Preliminary Analysis of B- and T-Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Without a specific antiviral treatment or vaccine, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a global pandemic, affecting over 200 countries worldwide. A better understanding of B- and T-cell immunity is critical to the diagnosis, treatment and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32710269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40291-020-00486-3 |
_version_ | 1783562864945004544 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Li-Xia Miao, Shu-Yan Qin, Zhong-Hua Wu, Jun-Pin Chen, Huai-Yong Sun, Hai-Bai Xie, Yi Du, Yan-Qing Shen, Jun |
author_facet | Zhang, Li-Xia Miao, Shu-Yan Qin, Zhong-Hua Wu, Jun-Pin Chen, Huai-Yong Sun, Hai-Bai Xie, Yi Du, Yan-Qing Shen, Jun |
author_sort | Zhang, Li-Xia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Without a specific antiviral treatment or vaccine, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a global pandemic, affecting over 200 countries worldwide. A better understanding of B- and T-cell immunity is critical to the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: A cohort of 129 patients with COVID-19 and 20 suspected cases were enrolled in this study, and a lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (LFIA) and a magnetic chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (MCLIA) were evaluated for SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG detection. Additionally, 127 patients with COVID-19 were selected for the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 to evaluate B-cell immunity, and peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets were quantified in 95 patients with COVID-19 to evaluate T-cell immunity. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of LFIA-IgM/IgG and MCLIA-IgM/IgG assays for detecting SARS-CoV infection were > 90%, comparable with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction detection. IgM antibody levels peaked on day 13 and began to fall on day 21, while IgG antibody levels peaked on day 17 and were maintained until tracking ended. Lymphocyte and subset enumeration suggested that lymphocytopenia occurred in patients with COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: LFIA-IgM/IgG and MCLIA-IgM/IgG assays can indicate SARS-CoV-2 infection, which elicits an antibody response. Lymphocytopenia occurs in patients with COVID-19, which possibly weakens the T-cell response. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7380500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73805002020-07-24 Preliminary Analysis of B- and T-Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Zhang, Li-Xia Miao, Shu-Yan Qin, Zhong-Hua Wu, Jun-Pin Chen, Huai-Yong Sun, Hai-Bai Xie, Yi Du, Yan-Qing Shen, Jun Mol Diagn Ther Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Without a specific antiviral treatment or vaccine, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a global pandemic, affecting over 200 countries worldwide. A better understanding of B- and T-cell immunity is critical to the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: A cohort of 129 patients with COVID-19 and 20 suspected cases were enrolled in this study, and a lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (LFIA) and a magnetic chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (MCLIA) were evaluated for SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG detection. Additionally, 127 patients with COVID-19 were selected for the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 to evaluate B-cell immunity, and peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets were quantified in 95 patients with COVID-19 to evaluate T-cell immunity. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of LFIA-IgM/IgG and MCLIA-IgM/IgG assays for detecting SARS-CoV infection were > 90%, comparable with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction detection. IgM antibody levels peaked on day 13 and began to fall on day 21, while IgG antibody levels peaked on day 17 and were maintained until tracking ended. Lymphocyte and subset enumeration suggested that lymphocytopenia occurred in patients with COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: LFIA-IgM/IgG and MCLIA-IgM/IgG assays can indicate SARS-CoV-2 infection, which elicits an antibody response. Lymphocytopenia occurs in patients with COVID-19, which possibly weakens the T-cell response. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7380500/ /pubmed/32710269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40291-020-00486-3 Text en © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Zhang, Li-Xia Miao, Shu-Yan Qin, Zhong-Hua Wu, Jun-Pin Chen, Huai-Yong Sun, Hai-Bai Xie, Yi Du, Yan-Qing Shen, Jun Preliminary Analysis of B- and T-Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 |
title | Preliminary Analysis of B- and T-Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full | Preliminary Analysis of B- and T-Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 |
title_fullStr | Preliminary Analysis of B- and T-Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full_unstemmed | Preliminary Analysis of B- and T-Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 |
title_short | Preliminary Analysis of B- and T-Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 |
title_sort | preliminary analysis of b- and t-cell responses to sars-cov-2 |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32710269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40291-020-00486-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanglixia preliminaryanalysisofbandtcellresponsestosarscov2 AT miaoshuyan preliminaryanalysisofbandtcellresponsestosarscov2 AT qinzhonghua preliminaryanalysisofbandtcellresponsestosarscov2 AT wujunpin preliminaryanalysisofbandtcellresponsestosarscov2 AT chenhuaiyong preliminaryanalysisofbandtcellresponsestosarscov2 AT sunhaibai preliminaryanalysisofbandtcellresponsestosarscov2 AT xieyi preliminaryanalysisofbandtcellresponsestosarscov2 AT duyanqing preliminaryanalysisofbandtcellresponsestosarscov2 AT shenjun preliminaryanalysisofbandtcellresponsestosarscov2 |