Cargando…

Postoperative pain, edema and trismus following third molar surgery – A comparitive study between submucosal and intravenous dexamethasone

BACKGROUND: Third molar surgey always needs primary intervention as it can lead to various complications and pathologies. Considering other ways for postoperative anesthesia it was infered that submucosal group which showed simple injection technique and direct surgical site administration is more b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sreesha, S., Ummar, M., Sooraj, S., Aslam, Sachin, Roshni, A., Jabir, K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32754519
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_188_20
_version_ 1783562908453568512
author Sreesha, S.
Ummar, M.
Sooraj, S.
Aslam, Sachin
Roshni, A.
Jabir, K
author_facet Sreesha, S.
Ummar, M.
Sooraj, S.
Aslam, Sachin
Roshni, A.
Jabir, K
author_sort Sreesha, S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Third molar surgey always needs primary intervention as it can lead to various complications and pathologies. Considering other ways for postoperative anesthesia it was infered that submucosal group which showed simple injection technique and direct surgical site administration is more beneficial. It was noticed as a patient comfort method which can be the preferred as the drug of choice over intravenous route of dexamethasone injection. INTRODUCTION: Impaction of third molar is a common affliction and surgical removal is the only treatment option. The post-operative sequelae following the third molar surgery are pain, edema and trismus. The use of corticosteroids is to counteract it via various routes. Still, controversy exists in the literature regarding the administration of corticosteroids over the routes and time of administration. The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative pain, edema and trismus following third molar surgery while using preoperative intravenous and submucosal routes of dexamethasone, in terms of pain, facial swelling, and trismus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study consisted of 64 patients presented with mesioangular impacted mandibular third molar for surgical removal. Preoperative measurements of edema, trismus were analyzed. Postoperative pain was estimated using visual analogue scale. Edema was assessed by the extra oral facial measurements. Trismus was measured by recording the interincisal opening in millimeters. Dexamethasone was administered intravenously or submucosally according to the choice of operating surgeon and were divided into 2 groups. RESULTS: Mean and standard deviation calculated for continuous variables. Changes in parameters was analysed using t test and Mann–Whitney U test. Here, submucosal group were reported with increased pain on the second postoperative day. On seventh postoperative day mean value turns to 0.7 ± 1 for submucosal and 0.6 ± 1.2 for intravenous group. On overall observation, intravenous group expressed statistically significant (P < 0.01) reduction in pain compared to the submucosal group during immediate and second postoperative days. CONCLUSION: Analyzing the previous studies, and from the experience of the present one, it could be reasonably found out that administration of submucosal dexamethasone is beneficial for overall patient compliance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7380777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73807772020-08-03 Postoperative pain, edema and trismus following third molar surgery – A comparitive study between submucosal and intravenous dexamethasone Sreesha, S. Ummar, M. Sooraj, S. Aslam, Sachin Roshni, A. Jabir, K J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Third molar surgey always needs primary intervention as it can lead to various complications and pathologies. Considering other ways for postoperative anesthesia it was infered that submucosal group which showed simple injection technique and direct surgical site administration is more beneficial. It was noticed as a patient comfort method which can be the preferred as the drug of choice over intravenous route of dexamethasone injection. INTRODUCTION: Impaction of third molar is a common affliction and surgical removal is the only treatment option. The post-operative sequelae following the third molar surgery are pain, edema and trismus. The use of corticosteroids is to counteract it via various routes. Still, controversy exists in the literature regarding the administration of corticosteroids over the routes and time of administration. The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative pain, edema and trismus following third molar surgery while using preoperative intravenous and submucosal routes of dexamethasone, in terms of pain, facial swelling, and trismus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study consisted of 64 patients presented with mesioangular impacted mandibular third molar for surgical removal. Preoperative measurements of edema, trismus were analyzed. Postoperative pain was estimated using visual analogue scale. Edema was assessed by the extra oral facial measurements. Trismus was measured by recording the interincisal opening in millimeters. Dexamethasone was administered intravenously or submucosally according to the choice of operating surgeon and were divided into 2 groups. RESULTS: Mean and standard deviation calculated for continuous variables. Changes in parameters was analysed using t test and Mann–Whitney U test. Here, submucosal group were reported with increased pain on the second postoperative day. On seventh postoperative day mean value turns to 0.7 ± 1 for submucosal and 0.6 ± 1.2 for intravenous group. On overall observation, intravenous group expressed statistically significant (P < 0.01) reduction in pain compared to the submucosal group during immediate and second postoperative days. CONCLUSION: Analyzing the previous studies, and from the experience of the present one, it could be reasonably found out that administration of submucosal dexamethasone is beneficial for overall patient compliance. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7380777/ /pubmed/32754519 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_188_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sreesha, S.
Ummar, M.
Sooraj, S.
Aslam, Sachin
Roshni, A.
Jabir, K
Postoperative pain, edema and trismus following third molar surgery – A comparitive study between submucosal and intravenous dexamethasone
title Postoperative pain, edema and trismus following third molar surgery – A comparitive study between submucosal and intravenous dexamethasone
title_full Postoperative pain, edema and trismus following third molar surgery – A comparitive study between submucosal and intravenous dexamethasone
title_fullStr Postoperative pain, edema and trismus following third molar surgery – A comparitive study between submucosal and intravenous dexamethasone
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative pain, edema and trismus following third molar surgery – A comparitive study between submucosal and intravenous dexamethasone
title_short Postoperative pain, edema and trismus following third molar surgery – A comparitive study between submucosal and intravenous dexamethasone
title_sort postoperative pain, edema and trismus following third molar surgery – a comparitive study between submucosal and intravenous dexamethasone
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32754519
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_188_20
work_keys_str_mv AT sreeshas postoperativepainedemaandtrismusfollowingthirdmolarsurgeryacomparitivestudybetweensubmucosalandintravenousdexamethasone
AT ummarm postoperativepainedemaandtrismusfollowingthirdmolarsurgeryacomparitivestudybetweensubmucosalandintravenousdexamethasone
AT soorajs postoperativepainedemaandtrismusfollowingthirdmolarsurgeryacomparitivestudybetweensubmucosalandintravenousdexamethasone
AT aslamsachin postoperativepainedemaandtrismusfollowingthirdmolarsurgeryacomparitivestudybetweensubmucosalandintravenousdexamethasone
AT roshnia postoperativepainedemaandtrismusfollowingthirdmolarsurgeryacomparitivestudybetweensubmucosalandintravenousdexamethasone
AT jabirk postoperativepainedemaandtrismusfollowingthirdmolarsurgeryacomparitivestudybetweensubmucosalandintravenousdexamethasone