Cargando…

Electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring in patients recovering from ambulatory minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: A prospective pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of an electronic symptom-tracking platform for patients recovering from ambulatory surgery. METHOD: We assessed user response to an electronic system designed to self-report symptoms. Endpoints included compliance, postoperative symptoms, patient satisfaction....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zivanovic, Oliver, Chen, Ling Y., Vickers, Andrew, Straubhar, Alli, Baser, Raymond, Veith, Mitchell, Aiken, Nate, Carter, Jeanne, Curran, Katherine, Simon, Brett, Mueller, Jennifer, Jewell, Elizabeth, Chi, Dennis S., Sonoda, Yukio, Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R., Leitao, Mario M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32718730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.004
_version_ 1783562940461350912
author Zivanovic, Oliver
Chen, Ling Y.
Vickers, Andrew
Straubhar, Alli
Baser, Raymond
Veith, Mitchell
Aiken, Nate
Carter, Jeanne
Curran, Katherine
Simon, Brett
Mueller, Jennifer
Jewell, Elizabeth
Chi, Dennis S.
Sonoda, Yukio
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
Leitao, Mario M.
author_facet Zivanovic, Oliver
Chen, Ling Y.
Vickers, Andrew
Straubhar, Alli
Baser, Raymond
Veith, Mitchell
Aiken, Nate
Carter, Jeanne
Curran, Katherine
Simon, Brett
Mueller, Jennifer
Jewell, Elizabeth
Chi, Dennis S.
Sonoda, Yukio
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
Leitao, Mario M.
author_sort Zivanovic, Oliver
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of an electronic symptom-tracking platform for patients recovering from ambulatory surgery. METHOD: We assessed user response to an electronic system designed to self-report symptoms. Endpoints included compliance, postoperative symptoms, patient satisfaction. An 8-item symptom inventory (pain, nausea, vomiting, shortness of breath, fever, swelling, discharge, redness) was developed and made available on postoperative days (POD) 2–6. Responses exceeding defined thresholds of severity triggered alerts to healthcare providers. Symptoms, alerts, actions taken, urgent care center (UCC) visits, hospital admissions were tracked until POD 30. Patient satisfaction was evaluated on POD 7. A patient was defined as “responder” if at least 5/8 items on at least 3 PODs were completed. The assessment method was deemed successful if 64/100 patients responded. RESULTS: 97/102 patients were evaluable; 65 met “responder” criteria (67% responder rate; 95% CI 57–76%). 321 surveys were completed (median 4/patient), 248 (77%) in ≤2 min. Involving caregivers and allowing additional symptom-reporting improved the responder rate to 72% (95% CI 58–84%). Most commonly-reported moderate, severe, very severe symptoms were pain, nausea, swelling; 71% reported moderate to very severe pain on POD 2. Phone calls and adjustment of medications adequately addressed most symptoms. Two patients (2%) presented at UCC before, 6 (6%) after, POD 6; 1 (1%) was admitted. Most agreed or strongly agreed that electronic symptom-tracking was helpful, easy to use, and would recommend it to others. CONCLUSION: Electronic symptom-tracking is feasible for patients undergoing ambulatory gynecologic cancer surgery. Symptom burden is high in the early postoperative period. Addressing patient-reported symptoms in a timely, automated manner may prevent severe downstream adverse events, reduce UCC visits and admission rates, and improve outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7380930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73809302020-07-28 Electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring in patients recovering from ambulatory minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: A prospective pilot study Zivanovic, Oliver Chen, Ling Y. Vickers, Andrew Straubhar, Alli Baser, Raymond Veith, Mitchell Aiken, Nate Carter, Jeanne Curran, Katherine Simon, Brett Mueller, Jennifer Jewell, Elizabeth Chi, Dennis S. Sonoda, Yukio Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R. Leitao, Mario M. Gynecol Oncol Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of an electronic symptom-tracking platform for patients recovering from ambulatory surgery. METHOD: We assessed user response to an electronic system designed to self-report symptoms. Endpoints included compliance, postoperative symptoms, patient satisfaction. An 8-item symptom inventory (pain, nausea, vomiting, shortness of breath, fever, swelling, discharge, redness) was developed and made available on postoperative days (POD) 2–6. Responses exceeding defined thresholds of severity triggered alerts to healthcare providers. Symptoms, alerts, actions taken, urgent care center (UCC) visits, hospital admissions were tracked until POD 30. Patient satisfaction was evaluated on POD 7. A patient was defined as “responder” if at least 5/8 items on at least 3 PODs were completed. The assessment method was deemed successful if 64/100 patients responded. RESULTS: 97/102 patients were evaluable; 65 met “responder” criteria (67% responder rate; 95% CI 57–76%). 321 surveys were completed (median 4/patient), 248 (77%) in ≤2 min. Involving caregivers and allowing additional symptom-reporting improved the responder rate to 72% (95% CI 58–84%). Most commonly-reported moderate, severe, very severe symptoms were pain, nausea, swelling; 71% reported moderate to very severe pain on POD 2. Phone calls and adjustment of medications adequately addressed most symptoms. Two patients (2%) presented at UCC before, 6 (6%) after, POD 6; 1 (1%) was admitted. Most agreed or strongly agreed that electronic symptom-tracking was helpful, easy to use, and would recommend it to others. CONCLUSION: Electronic symptom-tracking is feasible for patients undergoing ambulatory gynecologic cancer surgery. Symptom burden is high in the early postoperative period. Addressing patient-reported symptoms in a timely, automated manner may prevent severe downstream adverse events, reduce UCC visits and admission rates, and improve outcomes. Elsevier Inc. 2020-10 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7380930/ /pubmed/32718730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.004 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Zivanovic, Oliver
Chen, Ling Y.
Vickers, Andrew
Straubhar, Alli
Baser, Raymond
Veith, Mitchell
Aiken, Nate
Carter, Jeanne
Curran, Katherine
Simon, Brett
Mueller, Jennifer
Jewell, Elizabeth
Chi, Dennis S.
Sonoda, Yukio
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
Leitao, Mario M.
Electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring in patients recovering from ambulatory minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: A prospective pilot study
title Electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring in patients recovering from ambulatory minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: A prospective pilot study
title_full Electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring in patients recovering from ambulatory minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: A prospective pilot study
title_fullStr Electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring in patients recovering from ambulatory minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: A prospective pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring in patients recovering from ambulatory minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: A prospective pilot study
title_short Electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring in patients recovering from ambulatory minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: A prospective pilot study
title_sort electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring in patients recovering from ambulatory minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: a prospective pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32718730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.004
work_keys_str_mv AT zivanovicoliver electronicpatientreportedsymptommonitoringinpatientsrecoveringfromambulatoryminimallyinvasivegynecologicsurgeryaprospectivepilotstudy
AT chenlingy electronicpatientreportedsymptommonitoringinpatientsrecoveringfromambulatoryminimallyinvasivegynecologicsurgeryaprospectivepilotstudy
AT vickersandrew electronicpatientreportedsymptommonitoringinpatientsrecoveringfromambulatoryminimallyinvasivegynecologicsurgeryaprospectivepilotstudy
AT straubharalli electronicpatientreportedsymptommonitoringinpatientsrecoveringfromambulatoryminimallyinvasivegynecologicsurgeryaprospectivepilotstudy
AT baserraymond electronicpatientreportedsymptommonitoringinpatientsrecoveringfromambulatoryminimallyinvasivegynecologicsurgeryaprospectivepilotstudy
AT veithmitchell electronicpatientreportedsymptommonitoringinpatientsrecoveringfromambulatoryminimallyinvasivegynecologicsurgeryaprospectivepilotstudy
AT aikennate electronicpatientreportedsymptommonitoringinpatientsrecoveringfromambulatoryminimallyinvasivegynecologicsurgeryaprospectivepilotstudy
AT carterjeanne electronicpatientreportedsymptommonitoringinpatientsrecoveringfromambulatoryminimallyinvasivegynecologicsurgeryaprospectivepilotstudy
AT currankatherine electronicpatientreportedsymptommonitoringinpatientsrecoveringfromambulatoryminimallyinvasivegynecologicsurgeryaprospectivepilotstudy
AT simonbrett electronicpatientreportedsymptommonitoringinpatientsrecoveringfromambulatoryminimallyinvasivegynecologicsurgeryaprospectivepilotstudy
AT muellerjennifer electronicpatientreportedsymptommonitoringinpatientsrecoveringfromambulatoryminimallyinvasivegynecologicsurgeryaprospectivepilotstudy
AT jewellelizabeth electronicpatientreportedsymptommonitoringinpatientsrecoveringfromambulatoryminimallyinvasivegynecologicsurgeryaprospectivepilotstudy
AT chidenniss electronicpatientreportedsymptommonitoringinpatientsrecoveringfromambulatoryminimallyinvasivegynecologicsurgeryaprospectivepilotstudy
AT sonodayukio electronicpatientreportedsymptommonitoringinpatientsrecoveringfromambulatoryminimallyinvasivegynecologicsurgeryaprospectivepilotstudy
AT aburustumnadeemr electronicpatientreportedsymptommonitoringinpatientsrecoveringfromambulatoryminimallyinvasivegynecologicsurgeryaprospectivepilotstudy
AT leitaomariom electronicpatientreportedsymptommonitoringinpatientsrecoveringfromambulatoryminimallyinvasivegynecologicsurgeryaprospectivepilotstudy