Cargando…

Prediction Model for Timing of Death in Potential Donors After Circulatory Death (DCD III): Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) is a major source of organs for transplantation. A potential cDCD donor poses considerable challenges in terms of identification of those dying within the predefined time frame of warm ischemia after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kotsopoulos, Angela M M, Vos, Piet, Jansen, Nichon E, Bronkhorst, Ewald M, van der Hoeven, Johannes G, Abdo, Wilson F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32459638
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16733
_version_ 1783562947020193792
author Kotsopoulos, Angela M M
Vos, Piet
Jansen, Nichon E
Bronkhorst, Ewald M
van der Hoeven, Johannes G
Abdo, Wilson F
author_facet Kotsopoulos, Angela M M
Vos, Piet
Jansen, Nichon E
Bronkhorst, Ewald M
van der Hoeven, Johannes G
Abdo, Wilson F
author_sort Kotsopoulos, Angela M M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) is a major source of organs for transplantation. A potential cDCD donor poses considerable challenges in terms of identification of those dying within the predefined time frame of warm ischemia after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) to circulatory arrest. Several attempts have been made to develop models predicting the time between treatment withdrawal and circulatory arrest. This time window determines whether organ donation can occur and influences the quality of the donated organs. However, the selected patients used for these models were not always restricted to potential cDCD donors (eg, patients with cancer or severe infections were also included). This severely limits the generalizability of those data. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study are the following: (1) to develop a model predicting time to death within 60 minutes in potential cDCD patients; (2) to validate and update previous prediction models on time to death after WLST; (3) to determine timing and patient characteristics that are associated with prognostication and the decision-making process that leads to initiating end-of-life care; (4) to evaluate the impact of timing of family approach on organ donation approval; and (5) to assess the influence of variation in WLST processes on postmortem organ donor potential and actual postmortem organ donors. METHODS: In this multicenter observational prospective cohort study, all patients admitted to the intensive care unit of 3 university hospitals and 3 teaching hospitals who met the criteria of the cDCD protocol as defined by the Dutch Transplant Foundation were included. The target of enrolment was set to 400 patients. Previously developed models will be refitted in our data set. To further update previous prediction models, we will apply least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) as a tool for efficient variable selection to develop the multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: This protocol was funded in August 2014 by the Dutch Transplant Foundation. We expect to have the results of this study in July 2020. Patient enrolment was completed in July 2018 and data collection was completed in April 2020. CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide a robust multimodal prediction model, based on clinical and physiological parameters, that can predict time to circulatory arrest in cDCD donors. In addition, it will add valuable insight in the process of WLST in cDCD donors and will fill an important knowledge gap in this essential field of health care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04123275; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04123275 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/16733
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7380979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73809792020-08-06 Prediction Model for Timing of Death in Potential Donors After Circulatory Death (DCD III): Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study Kotsopoulos, Angela M M Vos, Piet Jansen, Nichon E Bronkhorst, Ewald M van der Hoeven, Johannes G Abdo, Wilson F JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) is a major source of organs for transplantation. A potential cDCD donor poses considerable challenges in terms of identification of those dying within the predefined time frame of warm ischemia after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) to circulatory arrest. Several attempts have been made to develop models predicting the time between treatment withdrawal and circulatory arrest. This time window determines whether organ donation can occur and influences the quality of the donated organs. However, the selected patients used for these models were not always restricted to potential cDCD donors (eg, patients with cancer or severe infections were also included). This severely limits the generalizability of those data. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study are the following: (1) to develop a model predicting time to death within 60 minutes in potential cDCD patients; (2) to validate and update previous prediction models on time to death after WLST; (3) to determine timing and patient characteristics that are associated with prognostication and the decision-making process that leads to initiating end-of-life care; (4) to evaluate the impact of timing of family approach on organ donation approval; and (5) to assess the influence of variation in WLST processes on postmortem organ donor potential and actual postmortem organ donors. METHODS: In this multicenter observational prospective cohort study, all patients admitted to the intensive care unit of 3 university hospitals and 3 teaching hospitals who met the criteria of the cDCD protocol as defined by the Dutch Transplant Foundation were included. The target of enrolment was set to 400 patients. Previously developed models will be refitted in our data set. To further update previous prediction models, we will apply least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) as a tool for efficient variable selection to develop the multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: This protocol was funded in August 2014 by the Dutch Transplant Foundation. We expect to have the results of this study in July 2020. Patient enrolment was completed in July 2018 and data collection was completed in April 2020. CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide a robust multimodal prediction model, based on clinical and physiological parameters, that can predict time to circulatory arrest in cDCD donors. In addition, it will add valuable insight in the process of WLST in cDCD donors and will fill an important knowledge gap in this essential field of health care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04123275; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04123275 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/16733 JMIR Publications 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7380979/ /pubmed/32459638 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16733 Text en ©Angela M M Kotsopoulos, Piet Vos, Nichon E Jansen, Ewald M Bronkhorst, Johannes G van der Hoeven, Wilson F Abdo. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 23.06.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Kotsopoulos, Angela M M
Vos, Piet
Jansen, Nichon E
Bronkhorst, Ewald M
van der Hoeven, Johannes G
Abdo, Wilson F
Prediction Model for Timing of Death in Potential Donors After Circulatory Death (DCD III): Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title Prediction Model for Timing of Death in Potential Donors After Circulatory Death (DCD III): Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title_full Prediction Model for Timing of Death in Potential Donors After Circulatory Death (DCD III): Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title_fullStr Prediction Model for Timing of Death in Potential Donors After Circulatory Death (DCD III): Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Prediction Model for Timing of Death in Potential Donors After Circulatory Death (DCD III): Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title_short Prediction Model for Timing of Death in Potential Donors After Circulatory Death (DCD III): Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study
title_sort prediction model for timing of death in potential donors after circulatory death (dcd iii): protocol for a multicenter prospective observational cohort study
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32459638
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16733
work_keys_str_mv AT kotsopoulosangelamm predictionmodelfortimingofdeathinpotentialdonorsaftercirculatorydeathdcdiiiprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT vospiet predictionmodelfortimingofdeathinpotentialdonorsaftercirculatorydeathdcdiiiprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT jansennichone predictionmodelfortimingofdeathinpotentialdonorsaftercirculatorydeathdcdiiiprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT bronkhorstewaldm predictionmodelfortimingofdeathinpotentialdonorsaftercirculatorydeathdcdiiiprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT vanderhoevenjohannesg predictionmodelfortimingofdeathinpotentialdonorsaftercirculatorydeathdcdiiiprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT abdowilsonf predictionmodelfortimingofdeathinpotentialdonorsaftercirculatorydeathdcdiiiprotocolforamulticenterprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy