Cargando…

Benefits of Massive Open Online Course Participation: Deductive Thematic Analysis

BACKGROUND: Massive open online courses (MOOCs), as originally conceived, promised to provide educational access to anyone with an internet connection. However, the expansiveness of MOOC education has been found to be somewhat limited. Nonetheless, leading universities continue to offer MOOCs, inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blum, Elizabeth R, Stenfors, Terese, Palmgren, Per J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7381083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32672680
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17318
_version_ 1783562971888222208
author Blum, Elizabeth R
Stenfors, Terese
Palmgren, Per J
author_facet Blum, Elizabeth R
Stenfors, Terese
Palmgren, Per J
author_sort Blum, Elizabeth R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Massive open online courses (MOOCs), as originally conceived, promised to provide educational access to anyone with an internet connection. However, the expansiveness of MOOC education has been found to be somewhat limited. Nonetheless, leading universities continue to offer MOOCs, including many in the health sciences, on a number of private platforms. Therefore, research on online education must include thorough understanding of the role of MOOCs. To date, studies on MOOC participants have focused mainly on learners’ assessment of the course. It is known that MOOCs are not reaching the universal audiences that were predicted, and much knowledge has been gained about learners’ perceptions of MOOCs. However, there is little scholarship on what learners themselves gain from participating in MOOCs. OBJECTIVE: As MOOC development persists and expands, scholars and developers should be made aware of the role of MOOCs in education by examining what these courses do offer their participants. The objective of this qualitative synthesis of a set of MOOC evaluation studies was to explore outcomes for MOOC learners, that is, how the learners themselves benefit from participating in MOOCs. METHODS: To explore MOOC learners’ outcomes, we conducted a qualitative synthesis in the form of a deductive thematic analysis, aggregating findings from 17 individual studies selected from an existing systematic review of MOOC evaluation methods. We structured our inquiry using the Kirkpatrick model, considering Kirkpatrick levels 2, 3, and 4 as potential themes in our analysis. RESULTS: Our analysis identified six types of Kirkpatrick outcomes in 17 studies. Five of these outcomes (learning/general knowledge, skills, attitudes, confidence, and commitment) fit into Kirkpatrick Level 2, while Kirkpatrick Level 3 outcomes concerning behavior/application were seen in four studies. Two additional themes were identified outside of the Kirkpatrick framework: culture and identity outcomes and affective/emotional outcomes. Kirkpatrick Level 4 was not represented among the outcomes we examined. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings point to some gains from MOOCs. While we can expect MOOCs to persist, how learners benefit from the experience of participating in MOOCs remains unclear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7381083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73810832020-08-07 Benefits of Massive Open Online Course Participation: Deductive Thematic Analysis Blum, Elizabeth R Stenfors, Terese Palmgren, Per J J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Massive open online courses (MOOCs), as originally conceived, promised to provide educational access to anyone with an internet connection. However, the expansiveness of MOOC education has been found to be somewhat limited. Nonetheless, leading universities continue to offer MOOCs, including many in the health sciences, on a number of private platforms. Therefore, research on online education must include thorough understanding of the role of MOOCs. To date, studies on MOOC participants have focused mainly on learners’ assessment of the course. It is known that MOOCs are not reaching the universal audiences that were predicted, and much knowledge has been gained about learners’ perceptions of MOOCs. However, there is little scholarship on what learners themselves gain from participating in MOOCs. OBJECTIVE: As MOOC development persists and expands, scholars and developers should be made aware of the role of MOOCs in education by examining what these courses do offer their participants. The objective of this qualitative synthesis of a set of MOOC evaluation studies was to explore outcomes for MOOC learners, that is, how the learners themselves benefit from participating in MOOCs. METHODS: To explore MOOC learners’ outcomes, we conducted a qualitative synthesis in the form of a deductive thematic analysis, aggregating findings from 17 individual studies selected from an existing systematic review of MOOC evaluation methods. We structured our inquiry using the Kirkpatrick model, considering Kirkpatrick levels 2, 3, and 4 as potential themes in our analysis. RESULTS: Our analysis identified six types of Kirkpatrick outcomes in 17 studies. Five of these outcomes (learning/general knowledge, skills, attitudes, confidence, and commitment) fit into Kirkpatrick Level 2, while Kirkpatrick Level 3 outcomes concerning behavior/application were seen in four studies. Two additional themes were identified outside of the Kirkpatrick framework: culture and identity outcomes and affective/emotional outcomes. Kirkpatrick Level 4 was not represented among the outcomes we examined. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings point to some gains from MOOCs. While we can expect MOOCs to persist, how learners benefit from the experience of participating in MOOCs remains unclear. JMIR Publications 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7381083/ /pubmed/32672680 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17318 Text en ©Elizabeth R Blum, Terese Stenfors, Per J Palmgren. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 08.07.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Blum, Elizabeth R
Stenfors, Terese
Palmgren, Per J
Benefits of Massive Open Online Course Participation: Deductive Thematic Analysis
title Benefits of Massive Open Online Course Participation: Deductive Thematic Analysis
title_full Benefits of Massive Open Online Course Participation: Deductive Thematic Analysis
title_fullStr Benefits of Massive Open Online Course Participation: Deductive Thematic Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Benefits of Massive Open Online Course Participation: Deductive Thematic Analysis
title_short Benefits of Massive Open Online Course Participation: Deductive Thematic Analysis
title_sort benefits of massive open online course participation: deductive thematic analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7381083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32672680
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17318
work_keys_str_mv AT blumelizabethr benefitsofmassiveopenonlinecourseparticipationdeductivethematicanalysis
AT stenforsterese benefitsofmassiveopenonlinecourseparticipationdeductivethematicanalysis
AT palmgrenperj benefitsofmassiveopenonlinecourseparticipationdeductivethematicanalysis