Cargando…

Efficiency of Sensory Substitution Devices Alone and in Combination With Self-Motion for Spatial Navigation in Sighted and Visually Impaired

Human adults can optimally combine vision with self-motion to facilitate navigation. In the absence of visual input (e.g., dark environments and visual impairments), sensory substitution devices (SSDs), such as The vOICe or BrainPort, which translate visual information into auditory or tactile infor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jicol, Crescent, Lloyd-Esenkaya, Tayfun, Proulx, Michael J., Lange-Smith, Simon, Scheller, Meike, O'Neill, Eamonn, Petrini, Karin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7381305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32754082
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01443
_version_ 1783563022286979072
author Jicol, Crescent
Lloyd-Esenkaya, Tayfun
Proulx, Michael J.
Lange-Smith, Simon
Scheller, Meike
O'Neill, Eamonn
Petrini, Karin
author_facet Jicol, Crescent
Lloyd-Esenkaya, Tayfun
Proulx, Michael J.
Lange-Smith, Simon
Scheller, Meike
O'Neill, Eamonn
Petrini, Karin
author_sort Jicol, Crescent
collection PubMed
description Human adults can optimally combine vision with self-motion to facilitate navigation. In the absence of visual input (e.g., dark environments and visual impairments), sensory substitution devices (SSDs), such as The vOICe or BrainPort, which translate visual information into auditory or tactile information, could be used to increase navigation precision when integrated together or with self-motion. In Experiment 1, we compared and assessed together The vOICe and BrainPort in aerial maps task performed by a group of sighted participants. In Experiment 2, we examined whether sighted individuals and a group of visually impaired (VI) individuals could benefit from using The vOICe, with and without self-motion, to accurately navigate a three-dimensional (3D) environment. In both studies, 3D motion tracking data were used to determine the level of precision with which participants performed two different tasks (an egocentric and an allocentric task) and three different conditions (two unisensory conditions and one multisensory condition). In Experiment 1, we found no benefit of using the devices together. In Experiment 2, the sighted performance during The vOICe was almost as good as that for self-motion despite a short training period, although we found no benefit (reduction in variability) of using The vOICe and self-motion in combination compared to the two in isolation. In contrast, the group of VI participants did benefit from combining The vOICe and self-motion despite the low number of trials. Finally, while both groups became more accurate in their use of The vOICe with increased trials, only the VI group showed an increased level of accuracy in the combined condition. Our findings highlight how exploiting non-visual multisensory integration to develop new assistive technologies could be key to help blind and VI persons, especially due to their difficulty in attaining allocentric information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7381305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73813052020-08-03 Efficiency of Sensory Substitution Devices Alone and in Combination With Self-Motion for Spatial Navigation in Sighted and Visually Impaired Jicol, Crescent Lloyd-Esenkaya, Tayfun Proulx, Michael J. Lange-Smith, Simon Scheller, Meike O'Neill, Eamonn Petrini, Karin Front Psychol Psychology Human adults can optimally combine vision with self-motion to facilitate navigation. In the absence of visual input (e.g., dark environments and visual impairments), sensory substitution devices (SSDs), such as The vOICe or BrainPort, which translate visual information into auditory or tactile information, could be used to increase navigation precision when integrated together or with self-motion. In Experiment 1, we compared and assessed together The vOICe and BrainPort in aerial maps task performed by a group of sighted participants. In Experiment 2, we examined whether sighted individuals and a group of visually impaired (VI) individuals could benefit from using The vOICe, with and without self-motion, to accurately navigate a three-dimensional (3D) environment. In both studies, 3D motion tracking data were used to determine the level of precision with which participants performed two different tasks (an egocentric and an allocentric task) and three different conditions (two unisensory conditions and one multisensory condition). In Experiment 1, we found no benefit of using the devices together. In Experiment 2, the sighted performance during The vOICe was almost as good as that for self-motion despite a short training period, although we found no benefit (reduction in variability) of using The vOICe and self-motion in combination compared to the two in isolation. In contrast, the group of VI participants did benefit from combining The vOICe and self-motion despite the low number of trials. Finally, while both groups became more accurate in their use of The vOICe with increased trials, only the VI group showed an increased level of accuracy in the combined condition. Our findings highlight how exploiting non-visual multisensory integration to develop new assistive technologies could be key to help blind and VI persons, especially due to their difficulty in attaining allocentric information. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7381305/ /pubmed/32754082 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01443 Text en Copyright © 2020 Jicol, Lloyd-Esenkaya, Proulx, Lange-Smith, Scheller, O'Neill and Petrini. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Jicol, Crescent
Lloyd-Esenkaya, Tayfun
Proulx, Michael J.
Lange-Smith, Simon
Scheller, Meike
O'Neill, Eamonn
Petrini, Karin
Efficiency of Sensory Substitution Devices Alone and in Combination With Self-Motion for Spatial Navigation in Sighted and Visually Impaired
title Efficiency of Sensory Substitution Devices Alone and in Combination With Self-Motion for Spatial Navigation in Sighted and Visually Impaired
title_full Efficiency of Sensory Substitution Devices Alone and in Combination With Self-Motion for Spatial Navigation in Sighted and Visually Impaired
title_fullStr Efficiency of Sensory Substitution Devices Alone and in Combination With Self-Motion for Spatial Navigation in Sighted and Visually Impaired
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of Sensory Substitution Devices Alone and in Combination With Self-Motion for Spatial Navigation in Sighted and Visually Impaired
title_short Efficiency of Sensory Substitution Devices Alone and in Combination With Self-Motion for Spatial Navigation in Sighted and Visually Impaired
title_sort efficiency of sensory substitution devices alone and in combination with self-motion for spatial navigation in sighted and visually impaired
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7381305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32754082
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01443
work_keys_str_mv AT jicolcrescent efficiencyofsensorysubstitutiondevicesaloneandincombinationwithselfmotionforspatialnavigationinsightedandvisuallyimpaired
AT lloydesenkayatayfun efficiencyofsensorysubstitutiondevicesaloneandincombinationwithselfmotionforspatialnavigationinsightedandvisuallyimpaired
AT proulxmichaelj efficiencyofsensorysubstitutiondevicesaloneandincombinationwithselfmotionforspatialnavigationinsightedandvisuallyimpaired
AT langesmithsimon efficiencyofsensorysubstitutiondevicesaloneandincombinationwithselfmotionforspatialnavigationinsightedandvisuallyimpaired
AT schellermeike efficiencyofsensorysubstitutiondevicesaloneandincombinationwithselfmotionforspatialnavigationinsightedandvisuallyimpaired
AT oneilleamonn efficiencyofsensorysubstitutiondevicesaloneandincombinationwithselfmotionforspatialnavigationinsightedandvisuallyimpaired
AT petrinikarin efficiencyofsensorysubstitutiondevicesaloneandincombinationwithselfmotionforspatialnavigationinsightedandvisuallyimpaired