Cargando…

Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities

Autonomous acoustic recorders are an increasingly popular method for low‐disturbance, large‐scale monitoring of sound‐producing animals, such as birds, anurans, bats, and other mammals. A specialized use of autonomous recording units (ARUs) is acoustic localization, in which a vocalizing animal is l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rhinehart, Tessa A., Chronister, Lauren M., Devlin, Trieste, Kitzes, Justin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7381569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32724552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6216
_version_ 1783563070204805120
author Rhinehart, Tessa A.
Chronister, Lauren M.
Devlin, Trieste
Kitzes, Justin
author_facet Rhinehart, Tessa A.
Chronister, Lauren M.
Devlin, Trieste
Kitzes, Justin
author_sort Rhinehart, Tessa A.
collection PubMed
description Autonomous acoustic recorders are an increasingly popular method for low‐disturbance, large‐scale monitoring of sound‐producing animals, such as birds, anurans, bats, and other mammals. A specialized use of autonomous recording units (ARUs) is acoustic localization, in which a vocalizing animal is located spatially, usually by quantifying the time delay of arrival of its sound at an array of time‐synchronized microphones. To describe trends in the literature, identify considerations for field biologists who wish to use these systems, and suggest advancements that will improve the field of acoustic localization, we comprehensively review published applications of wildlife localization in terrestrial environments. We describe the wide variety of methods used to complete the five steps of acoustic localization: (1) define the research question, (2) obtain or build a time‐synchronizing microphone array, (3) deploy the array to record sounds in the field, (4) process recordings captured in the field, and (5) determine animal location using position estimation algorithms. We find eight general purposes in ecology and animal behavior for localization systems: assessing individual animals' positions or movements, localizing multiple individuals simultaneously to study their interactions, determining animals' individual identities, quantifying sound amplitude or directionality, selecting subsets of sounds for further acoustic analysis, calculating species abundance, inferring territory boundaries or habitat use, and separating animal sounds from background noise to improve species classification. We find that the labor‐intensive steps of processing recordings and estimating animal positions have not yet been automated. In the near future, we expect that increased availability of recording hardware, development of automated and open‐source localization software, and improvement of automated sound classification algorithms will broaden the use of acoustic localization. With these three advances, ecologists will be better able to embrace acoustic localization, enabling low‐disturbance, large‐scale collection of animal position data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7381569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73815692020-07-27 Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities Rhinehart, Tessa A. Chronister, Lauren M. Devlin, Trieste Kitzes, Justin Ecol Evol Reviews Autonomous acoustic recorders are an increasingly popular method for low‐disturbance, large‐scale monitoring of sound‐producing animals, such as birds, anurans, bats, and other mammals. A specialized use of autonomous recording units (ARUs) is acoustic localization, in which a vocalizing animal is located spatially, usually by quantifying the time delay of arrival of its sound at an array of time‐synchronized microphones. To describe trends in the literature, identify considerations for field biologists who wish to use these systems, and suggest advancements that will improve the field of acoustic localization, we comprehensively review published applications of wildlife localization in terrestrial environments. We describe the wide variety of methods used to complete the five steps of acoustic localization: (1) define the research question, (2) obtain or build a time‐synchronizing microphone array, (3) deploy the array to record sounds in the field, (4) process recordings captured in the field, and (5) determine animal location using position estimation algorithms. We find eight general purposes in ecology and animal behavior for localization systems: assessing individual animals' positions or movements, localizing multiple individuals simultaneously to study their interactions, determining animals' individual identities, quantifying sound amplitude or directionality, selecting subsets of sounds for further acoustic analysis, calculating species abundance, inferring territory boundaries or habitat use, and separating animal sounds from background noise to improve species classification. We find that the labor‐intensive steps of processing recordings and estimating animal positions have not yet been automated. In the near future, we expect that increased availability of recording hardware, development of automated and open‐source localization software, and improvement of automated sound classification algorithms will broaden the use of acoustic localization. With these three advances, ecologists will be better able to embrace acoustic localization, enabling low‐disturbance, large‐scale collection of animal position data. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7381569/ /pubmed/32724552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6216 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Rhinehart, Tessa A.
Chronister, Lauren M.
Devlin, Trieste
Kitzes, Justin
Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities
title Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities
title_full Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities
title_fullStr Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities
title_full_unstemmed Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities
title_short Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities
title_sort acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: current practices and future opportunities
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7381569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32724552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6216
work_keys_str_mv AT rhineharttessaa acousticlocalizationofterrestrialwildlifecurrentpracticesandfutureopportunities
AT chronisterlaurenm acousticlocalizationofterrestrialwildlifecurrentpracticesandfutureopportunities
AT devlintrieste acousticlocalizationofterrestrialwildlifecurrentpracticesandfutureopportunities
AT kitzesjustin acousticlocalizationofterrestrialwildlifecurrentpracticesandfutureopportunities