Cargando…
Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities
Autonomous acoustic recorders are an increasingly popular method for low‐disturbance, large‐scale monitoring of sound‐producing animals, such as birds, anurans, bats, and other mammals. A specialized use of autonomous recording units (ARUs) is acoustic localization, in which a vocalizing animal is l...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7381569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32724552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6216 |
_version_ | 1783563070204805120 |
---|---|
author | Rhinehart, Tessa A. Chronister, Lauren M. Devlin, Trieste Kitzes, Justin |
author_facet | Rhinehart, Tessa A. Chronister, Lauren M. Devlin, Trieste Kitzes, Justin |
author_sort | Rhinehart, Tessa A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Autonomous acoustic recorders are an increasingly popular method for low‐disturbance, large‐scale monitoring of sound‐producing animals, such as birds, anurans, bats, and other mammals. A specialized use of autonomous recording units (ARUs) is acoustic localization, in which a vocalizing animal is located spatially, usually by quantifying the time delay of arrival of its sound at an array of time‐synchronized microphones. To describe trends in the literature, identify considerations for field biologists who wish to use these systems, and suggest advancements that will improve the field of acoustic localization, we comprehensively review published applications of wildlife localization in terrestrial environments. We describe the wide variety of methods used to complete the five steps of acoustic localization: (1) define the research question, (2) obtain or build a time‐synchronizing microphone array, (3) deploy the array to record sounds in the field, (4) process recordings captured in the field, and (5) determine animal location using position estimation algorithms. We find eight general purposes in ecology and animal behavior for localization systems: assessing individual animals' positions or movements, localizing multiple individuals simultaneously to study their interactions, determining animals' individual identities, quantifying sound amplitude or directionality, selecting subsets of sounds for further acoustic analysis, calculating species abundance, inferring territory boundaries or habitat use, and separating animal sounds from background noise to improve species classification. We find that the labor‐intensive steps of processing recordings and estimating animal positions have not yet been automated. In the near future, we expect that increased availability of recording hardware, development of automated and open‐source localization software, and improvement of automated sound classification algorithms will broaden the use of acoustic localization. With these three advances, ecologists will be better able to embrace acoustic localization, enabling low‐disturbance, large‐scale collection of animal position data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7381569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73815692020-07-27 Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities Rhinehart, Tessa A. Chronister, Lauren M. Devlin, Trieste Kitzes, Justin Ecol Evol Reviews Autonomous acoustic recorders are an increasingly popular method for low‐disturbance, large‐scale monitoring of sound‐producing animals, such as birds, anurans, bats, and other mammals. A specialized use of autonomous recording units (ARUs) is acoustic localization, in which a vocalizing animal is located spatially, usually by quantifying the time delay of arrival of its sound at an array of time‐synchronized microphones. To describe trends in the literature, identify considerations for field biologists who wish to use these systems, and suggest advancements that will improve the field of acoustic localization, we comprehensively review published applications of wildlife localization in terrestrial environments. We describe the wide variety of methods used to complete the five steps of acoustic localization: (1) define the research question, (2) obtain or build a time‐synchronizing microphone array, (3) deploy the array to record sounds in the field, (4) process recordings captured in the field, and (5) determine animal location using position estimation algorithms. We find eight general purposes in ecology and animal behavior for localization systems: assessing individual animals' positions or movements, localizing multiple individuals simultaneously to study their interactions, determining animals' individual identities, quantifying sound amplitude or directionality, selecting subsets of sounds for further acoustic analysis, calculating species abundance, inferring territory boundaries or habitat use, and separating animal sounds from background noise to improve species classification. We find that the labor‐intensive steps of processing recordings and estimating animal positions have not yet been automated. In the near future, we expect that increased availability of recording hardware, development of automated and open‐source localization software, and improvement of automated sound classification algorithms will broaden the use of acoustic localization. With these three advances, ecologists will be better able to embrace acoustic localization, enabling low‐disturbance, large‐scale collection of animal position data. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7381569/ /pubmed/32724552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6216 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Rhinehart, Tessa A. Chronister, Lauren M. Devlin, Trieste Kitzes, Justin Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities |
title | Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities |
title_full | Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities |
title_fullStr | Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities |
title_full_unstemmed | Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities |
title_short | Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities |
title_sort | acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: current practices and future opportunities |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7381569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32724552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rhineharttessaa acousticlocalizationofterrestrialwildlifecurrentpracticesandfutureopportunities AT chronisterlaurenm acousticlocalizationofterrestrialwildlifecurrentpracticesandfutureopportunities AT devlintrieste acousticlocalizationofterrestrialwildlifecurrentpracticesandfutureopportunities AT kitzesjustin acousticlocalizationofterrestrialwildlifecurrentpracticesandfutureopportunities |