Cargando…
Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits
The objective of this in vivo study was to compare bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) values of a new implant, designed to be inserted without bone preparation, using two different preparation protocols: no site preparation and prior limited cortical perforation, v...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7381624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32709971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69455-4 |
_version_ | 1783563082569613312 |
---|---|
author | Folkman, Merav Becker, Alina Meinster, Isabelle Masri, Mahmoud Ormianer, Zeev |
author_facet | Folkman, Merav Becker, Alina Meinster, Isabelle Masri, Mahmoud Ormianer, Zeev |
author_sort | Folkman, Merav |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this in vivo study was to compare bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) values of a new implant, designed to be inserted without bone preparation, using two different preparation protocols: no site preparation and prior limited cortical perforation, versus the values of a control implant using a conventional drilling protocol. Forty-one implants were inserted in 13 rabbits. Thirteen test implants with a new thread design were inserted using no bone preparation (NP), 14 test implants were inserted with limited cortical perforation (CP), and 14 conventional implants served as control. Five animals were sacrificed after 21 days and eight animals after 42 days. Histomorphometric analysis was performed and percentage of BIC and BAFO values were measured. ANOVA with Tukey post hoc and Mann–Whitney nonparametric tests were calculated to compare between the groups. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in the measured values between any of the groups, neither compered by implant nor by compered day. The results demonstrated that biological osseointegration parameters of implant that was inserted without any bone preparation was non-inferior compared to conventional preparation. The clinical relevance is that novel implant designs may not require bone preparation prior to placement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7381624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73816242020-07-28 Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits Folkman, Merav Becker, Alina Meinster, Isabelle Masri, Mahmoud Ormianer, Zeev Sci Rep Article The objective of this in vivo study was to compare bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) values of a new implant, designed to be inserted without bone preparation, using two different preparation protocols: no site preparation and prior limited cortical perforation, versus the values of a control implant using a conventional drilling protocol. Forty-one implants were inserted in 13 rabbits. Thirteen test implants with a new thread design were inserted using no bone preparation (NP), 14 test implants were inserted with limited cortical perforation (CP), and 14 conventional implants served as control. Five animals were sacrificed after 21 days and eight animals after 42 days. Histomorphometric analysis was performed and percentage of BIC and BAFO values were measured. ANOVA with Tukey post hoc and Mann–Whitney nonparametric tests were calculated to compare between the groups. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in the measured values between any of the groups, neither compered by implant nor by compered day. The results demonstrated that biological osseointegration parameters of implant that was inserted without any bone preparation was non-inferior compared to conventional preparation. The clinical relevance is that novel implant designs may not require bone preparation prior to placement. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7381624/ /pubmed/32709971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69455-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Folkman, Merav Becker, Alina Meinster, Isabelle Masri, Mahmoud Ormianer, Zeev Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits |
title | Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits |
title_full | Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits |
title_fullStr | Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits |
title_short | Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits |
title_sort | comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7381624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32709971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69455-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT folkmanmerav comparisonofbonetoimplantcontactandbonevolumearoundimplantsplacedwithorwithoutsitepreparationahistomorphometricstudyinrabbits AT beckeralina comparisonofbonetoimplantcontactandbonevolumearoundimplantsplacedwithorwithoutsitepreparationahistomorphometricstudyinrabbits AT meinsterisabelle comparisonofbonetoimplantcontactandbonevolumearoundimplantsplacedwithorwithoutsitepreparationahistomorphometricstudyinrabbits AT masrimahmoud comparisonofbonetoimplantcontactandbonevolumearoundimplantsplacedwithorwithoutsitepreparationahistomorphometricstudyinrabbits AT ormianerzeev comparisonofbonetoimplantcontactandbonevolumearoundimplantsplacedwithorwithoutsitepreparationahistomorphometricstudyinrabbits |