Cargando…

Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits

The objective of this in vivo study was to compare bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) values of a new implant, designed to be inserted without bone preparation, using two different preparation protocols: no site preparation and prior limited cortical perforation, v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Folkman, Merav, Becker, Alina, Meinster, Isabelle, Masri, Mahmoud, Ormianer, Zeev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7381624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32709971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69455-4
_version_ 1783563082569613312
author Folkman, Merav
Becker, Alina
Meinster, Isabelle
Masri, Mahmoud
Ormianer, Zeev
author_facet Folkman, Merav
Becker, Alina
Meinster, Isabelle
Masri, Mahmoud
Ormianer, Zeev
author_sort Folkman, Merav
collection PubMed
description The objective of this in vivo study was to compare bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) values of a new implant, designed to be inserted without bone preparation, using two different preparation protocols: no site preparation and prior limited cortical perforation, versus the values of a control implant using a conventional drilling protocol. Forty-one implants were inserted in 13 rabbits. Thirteen test implants with a new thread design were inserted using no bone preparation (NP), 14 test implants were inserted with limited cortical perforation (CP), and 14 conventional implants served as control. Five animals were sacrificed after 21 days and eight animals after 42 days. Histomorphometric analysis was performed and percentage of BIC and BAFO values were measured. ANOVA with Tukey post hoc and Mann–Whitney nonparametric tests were calculated to compare between the groups. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in the measured values between any of the groups, neither compered by implant nor by compered day. The results demonstrated that biological osseointegration parameters of implant that was inserted without any bone preparation was non-inferior compared to conventional preparation. The clinical relevance is that novel implant designs may not require bone preparation prior to placement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7381624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73816242020-07-28 Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits Folkman, Merav Becker, Alina Meinster, Isabelle Masri, Mahmoud Ormianer, Zeev Sci Rep Article The objective of this in vivo study was to compare bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) values of a new implant, designed to be inserted without bone preparation, using two different preparation protocols: no site preparation and prior limited cortical perforation, versus the values of a control implant using a conventional drilling protocol. Forty-one implants were inserted in 13 rabbits. Thirteen test implants with a new thread design were inserted using no bone preparation (NP), 14 test implants were inserted with limited cortical perforation (CP), and 14 conventional implants served as control. Five animals were sacrificed after 21 days and eight animals after 42 days. Histomorphometric analysis was performed and percentage of BIC and BAFO values were measured. ANOVA with Tukey post hoc and Mann–Whitney nonparametric tests were calculated to compare between the groups. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in the measured values between any of the groups, neither compered by implant nor by compered day. The results demonstrated that biological osseointegration parameters of implant that was inserted without any bone preparation was non-inferior compared to conventional preparation. The clinical relevance is that novel implant designs may not require bone preparation prior to placement. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7381624/ /pubmed/32709971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69455-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Folkman, Merav
Becker, Alina
Meinster, Isabelle
Masri, Mahmoud
Ormianer, Zeev
Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits
title Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits
title_full Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits
title_fullStr Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits
title_short Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits
title_sort comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7381624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32709971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69455-4
work_keys_str_mv AT folkmanmerav comparisonofbonetoimplantcontactandbonevolumearoundimplantsplacedwithorwithoutsitepreparationahistomorphometricstudyinrabbits
AT beckeralina comparisonofbonetoimplantcontactandbonevolumearoundimplantsplacedwithorwithoutsitepreparationahistomorphometricstudyinrabbits
AT meinsterisabelle comparisonofbonetoimplantcontactandbonevolumearoundimplantsplacedwithorwithoutsitepreparationahistomorphometricstudyinrabbits
AT masrimahmoud comparisonofbonetoimplantcontactandbonevolumearoundimplantsplacedwithorwithoutsitepreparationahistomorphometricstudyinrabbits
AT ormianerzeev comparisonofbonetoimplantcontactandbonevolumearoundimplantsplacedwithorwithoutsitepreparationahistomorphometricstudyinrabbits