Cargando…

A Comparative Study Between Two Support Surfaces for Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Healing in ICU Patients

Objective The aim of this research was to compare the effectiveness of two mattresses used in intensive care unit (ICU) high-risk patients in terms of pressure ulcers (PUs) prevention and healing. Materials and Methods The studied sample consisted of 70 consecutive patients aged 18 to 65 years hospi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marvaki, Aikaterini, Kourlaba, Georgia, Kadda, Olga, Vasilopoulos, Georgios, Rovina, Nikoleta, Koutsoukou, Antonia, Kotanidou, Anastasia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7381843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32724736
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8785
_version_ 1783563130898481152
author Marvaki, Aikaterini
Kourlaba, Georgia
Kadda, Olga
Vasilopoulos, Georgios
Rovina, Nikoleta
Koutsoukou, Antonia
Kotanidou, Anastasia
author_facet Marvaki, Aikaterini
Kourlaba, Georgia
Kadda, Olga
Vasilopoulos, Georgios
Rovina, Nikoleta
Koutsoukou, Antonia
Kotanidou, Anastasia
author_sort Marvaki, Aikaterini
collection PubMed
description Objective The aim of this research was to compare the effectiveness of two mattresses used in intensive care unit (ICU) high-risk patients in terms of pressure ulcers (PUs) prevention and healing. Materials and Methods The studied sample consisted of 70 consecutive patients aged 18 to 65 years hospitalized in two ICUs of a general hospital in Athens, Greece. Virtuoso Mattress System (LINET, Slaný, Czech Republic) was used in 35 patients, and standard memory foam mattress was used in the rest of participants. Patients were firstly assessed on enrollment and then every 72 hours in order to record the appearance or not of PUs, location of PUs, and stage of PUs, with the maximum follow-up not exceeding the 21 days. A number of clinical and biochemical factors, medical treatment, and vital signs were also recorded at each time point. Results Of the 70 patients, 40 (57.1%) were men, and the mean ± standard deviation age of the sample was 46.1 ± 14.5 years. The most common area of PUs was the buttocks (34.3%) followed by the shoulders (22.3%), with no statistically significant difference detected between the two groups. Moreover, the proportion of patients having PUs at stage 2 or higher was 23.8% on the third day after admission and 61.1% on the sixth day, with no difference detected between the two groups. Cox proportional hazard model revealed that the Virtuoso mattress was associated with almost 56% lower risk of developing PUs compared with standard foam mattress (HR [95% CI]: 0.44 [0.20-0.93]). The percentage of patients healed using the Virtuoso mattress was significantly lower compared with the standard foam mattress at all time points, with the results reaching statistical significance only on the 12th day after admission (7.7% vs. 66.7%; p < 0.05). Conclusions The Virtuoso mattress seems to be more effective compared with standard foam mattresses in the prevention of PUs, whereas the standard foam mattresses are more effective in PU healing process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7381843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73818432020-07-27 A Comparative Study Between Two Support Surfaces for Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Healing in ICU Patients Marvaki, Aikaterini Kourlaba, Georgia Kadda, Olga Vasilopoulos, Georgios Rovina, Nikoleta Koutsoukou, Antonia Kotanidou, Anastasia Cureus Internal Medicine Objective The aim of this research was to compare the effectiveness of two mattresses used in intensive care unit (ICU) high-risk patients in terms of pressure ulcers (PUs) prevention and healing. Materials and Methods The studied sample consisted of 70 consecutive patients aged 18 to 65 years hospitalized in two ICUs of a general hospital in Athens, Greece. Virtuoso Mattress System (LINET, Slaný, Czech Republic) was used in 35 patients, and standard memory foam mattress was used in the rest of participants. Patients were firstly assessed on enrollment and then every 72 hours in order to record the appearance or not of PUs, location of PUs, and stage of PUs, with the maximum follow-up not exceeding the 21 days. A number of clinical and biochemical factors, medical treatment, and vital signs were also recorded at each time point. Results Of the 70 patients, 40 (57.1%) were men, and the mean ± standard deviation age of the sample was 46.1 ± 14.5 years. The most common area of PUs was the buttocks (34.3%) followed by the shoulders (22.3%), with no statistically significant difference detected between the two groups. Moreover, the proportion of patients having PUs at stage 2 or higher was 23.8% on the third day after admission and 61.1% on the sixth day, with no difference detected between the two groups. Cox proportional hazard model revealed that the Virtuoso mattress was associated with almost 56% lower risk of developing PUs compared with standard foam mattress (HR [95% CI]: 0.44 [0.20-0.93]). The percentage of patients healed using the Virtuoso mattress was significantly lower compared with the standard foam mattress at all time points, with the results reaching statistical significance only on the 12th day after admission (7.7% vs. 66.7%; p < 0.05). Conclusions The Virtuoso mattress seems to be more effective compared with standard foam mattresses in the prevention of PUs, whereas the standard foam mattresses are more effective in PU healing process. Cureus 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7381843/ /pubmed/32724736 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8785 Text en Copyright © 2020, Marvaki et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Internal Medicine
Marvaki, Aikaterini
Kourlaba, Georgia
Kadda, Olga
Vasilopoulos, Georgios
Rovina, Nikoleta
Koutsoukou, Antonia
Kotanidou, Anastasia
A Comparative Study Between Two Support Surfaces for Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Healing in ICU Patients
title A Comparative Study Between Two Support Surfaces for Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Healing in ICU Patients
title_full A Comparative Study Between Two Support Surfaces for Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Healing in ICU Patients
title_fullStr A Comparative Study Between Two Support Surfaces for Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Healing in ICU Patients
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study Between Two Support Surfaces for Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Healing in ICU Patients
title_short A Comparative Study Between Two Support Surfaces for Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Healing in ICU Patients
title_sort comparative study between two support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention and healing in icu patients
topic Internal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7381843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32724736
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8785
work_keys_str_mv AT marvakiaikaterini acomparativestudybetweentwosupportsurfacesforpressureulcerpreventionandhealinginicupatients
AT kourlabageorgia acomparativestudybetweentwosupportsurfacesforpressureulcerpreventionandhealinginicupatients
AT kaddaolga acomparativestudybetweentwosupportsurfacesforpressureulcerpreventionandhealinginicupatients
AT vasilopoulosgeorgios acomparativestudybetweentwosupportsurfacesforpressureulcerpreventionandhealinginicupatients
AT rovinanikoleta acomparativestudybetweentwosupportsurfacesforpressureulcerpreventionandhealinginicupatients
AT koutsoukouantonia acomparativestudybetweentwosupportsurfacesforpressureulcerpreventionandhealinginicupatients
AT kotanidouanastasia acomparativestudybetweentwosupportsurfacesforpressureulcerpreventionandhealinginicupatients
AT marvakiaikaterini comparativestudybetweentwosupportsurfacesforpressureulcerpreventionandhealinginicupatients
AT kourlabageorgia comparativestudybetweentwosupportsurfacesforpressureulcerpreventionandhealinginicupatients
AT kaddaolga comparativestudybetweentwosupportsurfacesforpressureulcerpreventionandhealinginicupatients
AT vasilopoulosgeorgios comparativestudybetweentwosupportsurfacesforpressureulcerpreventionandhealinginicupatients
AT rovinanikoleta comparativestudybetweentwosupportsurfacesforpressureulcerpreventionandhealinginicupatients
AT koutsoukouantonia comparativestudybetweentwosupportsurfacesforpressureulcerpreventionandhealinginicupatients
AT kotanidouanastasia comparativestudybetweentwosupportsurfacesforpressureulcerpreventionandhealinginicupatients