Cargando…

Individual differences determine the strength of ecological interactions

Biotic interactions are central to both ecological and evolutionary dynamics. In the vast majority of empirical studies, the strength of intraspecific interactions is estimated by using simple measures of population size. Biologists have long known that these are crude metrics, with experiments and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griffiths, Jason I., Childs, Dylan Z., Bassar, Ronald D., Coulson, Tim, Reznick, David N., Rees, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32631995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2000635117
_version_ 1783563215459844096
author Griffiths, Jason I.
Childs, Dylan Z.
Bassar, Ronald D.
Coulson, Tim
Reznick, David N.
Rees, Mark
author_facet Griffiths, Jason I.
Childs, Dylan Z.
Bassar, Ronald D.
Coulson, Tim
Reznick, David N.
Rees, Mark
author_sort Griffiths, Jason I.
collection PubMed
description Biotic interactions are central to both ecological and evolutionary dynamics. In the vast majority of empirical studies, the strength of intraspecific interactions is estimated by using simple measures of population size. Biologists have long known that these are crude metrics, with experiments and theory suggesting that interactions between individuals should depend on traits, such as body size. Despite this, it has been difficult to estimate the impact of traits on competitive ability from ecological field data, and this explains why the strength of biotic interactions has empirically been treated in a simplistic manner. Using long-term observational data from four different populations, we show that large Trinidadian guppies impose a significantly larger competitive pressure on conspecifics than individuals that are smaller; in other words, competition is asymmetric. When we incorporate this asymmetry into integral projection models, the predicted size structure is much closer to what we see in the field compared with models where competition is independent of body size. This difference in size structure translates into a twofold difference in reproductive output. This demonstrates how the nature of ecological interactions drives the size structure, which, in turn, will have important implications for both the ecological and evolutionary dynamics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7382284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73822842020-07-30 Individual differences determine the strength of ecological interactions Griffiths, Jason I. Childs, Dylan Z. Bassar, Ronald D. Coulson, Tim Reznick, David N. Rees, Mark Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences Biotic interactions are central to both ecological and evolutionary dynamics. In the vast majority of empirical studies, the strength of intraspecific interactions is estimated by using simple measures of population size. Biologists have long known that these are crude metrics, with experiments and theory suggesting that interactions between individuals should depend on traits, such as body size. Despite this, it has been difficult to estimate the impact of traits on competitive ability from ecological field data, and this explains why the strength of biotic interactions has empirically been treated in a simplistic manner. Using long-term observational data from four different populations, we show that large Trinidadian guppies impose a significantly larger competitive pressure on conspecifics than individuals that are smaller; in other words, competition is asymmetric. When we incorporate this asymmetry into integral projection models, the predicted size structure is much closer to what we see in the field compared with models where competition is independent of body size. This difference in size structure translates into a twofold difference in reproductive output. This demonstrates how the nature of ecological interactions drives the size structure, which, in turn, will have important implications for both the ecological and evolutionary dynamics. National Academy of Sciences 2020-07-21 2020-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7382284/ /pubmed/32631995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2000635117 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Biological Sciences
Griffiths, Jason I.
Childs, Dylan Z.
Bassar, Ronald D.
Coulson, Tim
Reznick, David N.
Rees, Mark
Individual differences determine the strength of ecological interactions
title Individual differences determine the strength of ecological interactions
title_full Individual differences determine the strength of ecological interactions
title_fullStr Individual differences determine the strength of ecological interactions
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences determine the strength of ecological interactions
title_short Individual differences determine the strength of ecological interactions
title_sort individual differences determine the strength of ecological interactions
topic Biological Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32631995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2000635117
work_keys_str_mv AT griffithsjasoni individualdifferencesdeterminethestrengthofecologicalinteractions
AT childsdylanz individualdifferencesdeterminethestrengthofecologicalinteractions
AT bassarronaldd individualdifferencesdeterminethestrengthofecologicalinteractions
AT coulsontim individualdifferencesdeterminethestrengthofecologicalinteractions
AT reznickdavidn individualdifferencesdeterminethestrengthofecologicalinteractions
AT reesmark individualdifferencesdeterminethestrengthofecologicalinteractions