Cargando…
The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is used to optimize oxygenation by preventing alveolar collapse. However, PEEP can potentially decrease cardiac output through cardiopulmonary interactions. The effect of PEEP on cardiac output during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is not know...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32712733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-020-00330-2 |
_version_ | 1783563220410171392 |
---|---|
author | Levenbrown, Yosef Hossain, Md Jobayer Keith, James P. Burr, Katlyn Hesek, Anne Shaffer, Thomas |
author_facet | Levenbrown, Yosef Hossain, Md Jobayer Keith, James P. Burr, Katlyn Hesek, Anne Shaffer, Thomas |
author_sort | Levenbrown, Yosef |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is used to optimize oxygenation by preventing alveolar collapse. However, PEEP can potentially decrease cardiac output through cardiopulmonary interactions. The effect of PEEP on cardiac output during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is not known. METHODS: This was a preclinical randomized, controlled, animal study conducted in an animal research facility on 25 Landrace-Yorkshire pigs. After inducing cardiac arrest, CPR was performed with LUCAS 3. During CPR, pigs were ventilated at a PEEP of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 cmH(2)O (randomly determined via lottery) for 9 min. Cardiac output, obtained via ultrasound dilution, and PaO(2) were measured, and oxygen delivery calculated for each PEEP. RESULTS: A mixed-effects repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the baseline value adjusted mean cardiac output, PaO(2), and oxygen delivery between PEEP groups. Least significant difference test was used to conduct pairwise comparisons between PEEP groups. To determine optimum PEEP, Gaussian mixture model was applied to the adjusted means of cardiac output and oxygen delivery. Increasing PEEP to 10 and higher resulted in significant declines in cardiac output. A PEEP of 15 and higher resulted in significant declines in oxygen delivery. As PEEP was increased from 0 to 20, PaO(2) increased significantly. Gaussian mixture model identified the 0–5 PEEP group as providing optimal cardiac output and oxygen delivery, with PEEP of 5 providing the highest oxygen delivery. CONCLUSIONS: A PEEP of 0–5 resulted in the optimal oxygen delivery and cardiac output during CPR, with PEEP of 5 resulting in higher oxygen delivery, and a slightly lower, statistically insignificant cardiac output than PEEP of 0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7382317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73823172020-07-28 The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation Levenbrown, Yosef Hossain, Md Jobayer Keith, James P. Burr, Katlyn Hesek, Anne Shaffer, Thomas Intensive Care Med Exp Research BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is used to optimize oxygenation by preventing alveolar collapse. However, PEEP can potentially decrease cardiac output through cardiopulmonary interactions. The effect of PEEP on cardiac output during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is not known. METHODS: This was a preclinical randomized, controlled, animal study conducted in an animal research facility on 25 Landrace-Yorkshire pigs. After inducing cardiac arrest, CPR was performed with LUCAS 3. During CPR, pigs were ventilated at a PEEP of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 cmH(2)O (randomly determined via lottery) for 9 min. Cardiac output, obtained via ultrasound dilution, and PaO(2) were measured, and oxygen delivery calculated for each PEEP. RESULTS: A mixed-effects repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the baseline value adjusted mean cardiac output, PaO(2), and oxygen delivery between PEEP groups. Least significant difference test was used to conduct pairwise comparisons between PEEP groups. To determine optimum PEEP, Gaussian mixture model was applied to the adjusted means of cardiac output and oxygen delivery. Increasing PEEP to 10 and higher resulted in significant declines in cardiac output. A PEEP of 15 and higher resulted in significant declines in oxygen delivery. As PEEP was increased from 0 to 20, PaO(2) increased significantly. Gaussian mixture model identified the 0–5 PEEP group as providing optimal cardiac output and oxygen delivery, with PEEP of 5 providing the highest oxygen delivery. CONCLUSIONS: A PEEP of 0–5 resulted in the optimal oxygen delivery and cardiac output during CPR, with PEEP of 5 resulting in higher oxygen delivery, and a slightly lower, statistically insignificant cardiac output than PEEP of 0. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7382317/ /pubmed/32712733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-020-00330-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Levenbrown, Yosef Hossain, Md Jobayer Keith, James P. Burr, Katlyn Hesek, Anne Shaffer, Thomas The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
title | The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
title_full | The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
title_fullStr | The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
title_short | The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
title_sort | effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32712733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-020-00330-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levenbrownyosef theeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT hossainmdjobayer theeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT keithjamesp theeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT burrkatlyn theeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT hesekanne theeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT shafferthomas theeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT levenbrownyosef effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT hossainmdjobayer effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT keithjamesp effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT burrkatlyn effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT hesekanne effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation AT shafferthomas effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation |