Cargando…

The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is used to optimize oxygenation by preventing alveolar collapse. However, PEEP can potentially decrease cardiac output through cardiopulmonary interactions. The effect of PEEP on cardiac output during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is not know...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levenbrown, Yosef, Hossain, Md Jobayer, Keith, James P., Burr, Katlyn, Hesek, Anne, Shaffer, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32712733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-020-00330-2
_version_ 1783563220410171392
author Levenbrown, Yosef
Hossain, Md Jobayer
Keith, James P.
Burr, Katlyn
Hesek, Anne
Shaffer, Thomas
author_facet Levenbrown, Yosef
Hossain, Md Jobayer
Keith, James P.
Burr, Katlyn
Hesek, Anne
Shaffer, Thomas
author_sort Levenbrown, Yosef
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is used to optimize oxygenation by preventing alveolar collapse. However, PEEP can potentially decrease cardiac output through cardiopulmonary interactions. The effect of PEEP on cardiac output during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is not known. METHODS: This was a preclinical randomized, controlled, animal study conducted in an animal research facility on 25 Landrace-Yorkshire pigs. After inducing cardiac arrest, CPR was performed with LUCAS 3. During CPR, pigs were ventilated at a PEEP of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 cmH(2)O (randomly determined via lottery) for 9 min. Cardiac output, obtained via ultrasound dilution, and PaO(2) were measured, and oxygen delivery calculated for each PEEP. RESULTS: A mixed-effects repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the baseline value adjusted mean cardiac output, PaO(2), and oxygen delivery between PEEP groups. Least significant difference test was used to conduct pairwise comparisons between PEEP groups. To determine optimum PEEP, Gaussian mixture model was applied to the adjusted means of cardiac output and oxygen delivery. Increasing PEEP to 10 and higher resulted in significant declines in cardiac output. A PEEP of 15 and higher resulted in significant declines in oxygen delivery. As PEEP was increased from 0 to 20, PaO(2) increased significantly. Gaussian mixture model identified the 0–5 PEEP group as providing optimal cardiac output and oxygen delivery, with PEEP of 5 providing the highest oxygen delivery. CONCLUSIONS: A PEEP of 0–5 resulted in the optimal oxygen delivery and cardiac output during CPR, with PEEP of 5 resulting in higher oxygen delivery, and a slightly lower, statistically insignificant cardiac output than PEEP of 0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7382317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73823172020-07-28 The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation Levenbrown, Yosef Hossain, Md Jobayer Keith, James P. Burr, Katlyn Hesek, Anne Shaffer, Thomas Intensive Care Med Exp Research BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is used to optimize oxygenation by preventing alveolar collapse. However, PEEP can potentially decrease cardiac output through cardiopulmonary interactions. The effect of PEEP on cardiac output during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is not known. METHODS: This was a preclinical randomized, controlled, animal study conducted in an animal research facility on 25 Landrace-Yorkshire pigs. After inducing cardiac arrest, CPR was performed with LUCAS 3. During CPR, pigs were ventilated at a PEEP of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 cmH(2)O (randomly determined via lottery) for 9 min. Cardiac output, obtained via ultrasound dilution, and PaO(2) were measured, and oxygen delivery calculated for each PEEP. RESULTS: A mixed-effects repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the baseline value adjusted mean cardiac output, PaO(2), and oxygen delivery between PEEP groups. Least significant difference test was used to conduct pairwise comparisons between PEEP groups. To determine optimum PEEP, Gaussian mixture model was applied to the adjusted means of cardiac output and oxygen delivery. Increasing PEEP to 10 and higher resulted in significant declines in cardiac output. A PEEP of 15 and higher resulted in significant declines in oxygen delivery. As PEEP was increased from 0 to 20, PaO(2) increased significantly. Gaussian mixture model identified the 0–5 PEEP group as providing optimal cardiac output and oxygen delivery, with PEEP of 5 providing the highest oxygen delivery. CONCLUSIONS: A PEEP of 0–5 resulted in the optimal oxygen delivery and cardiac output during CPR, with PEEP of 5 resulting in higher oxygen delivery, and a slightly lower, statistically insignificant cardiac output than PEEP of 0. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7382317/ /pubmed/32712733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-020-00330-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Levenbrown, Yosef
Hossain, Md Jobayer
Keith, James P.
Burr, Katlyn
Hesek, Anne
Shaffer, Thomas
The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
title The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
title_full The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
title_fullStr The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
title_full_unstemmed The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
title_short The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
title_sort effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac output and oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32712733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-020-00330-2
work_keys_str_mv AT levenbrownyosef theeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT hossainmdjobayer theeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT keithjamesp theeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT burrkatlyn theeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT hesekanne theeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT shafferthomas theeffectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT levenbrownyosef effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT hossainmdjobayer effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT keithjamesp effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT burrkatlyn effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT hesekanne effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT shafferthomas effectofpositiveendexpiratorypressureoncardiacoutputandoxygendeliveryduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation