Cargando…

Challenges and shifting treatment strategies in the surgical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer

The current standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in Korea and Western countries is a multimodal approach incorporating preoperative long‐course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy. This approach has significantly impr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Ho Seung, Kim, Nam Kyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32724881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12349
_version_ 1783563241024126976
author Kim, Ho Seung
Kim, Nam Kyu
author_facet Kim, Ho Seung
Kim, Nam Kyu
author_sort Kim, Ho Seung
collection PubMed
description The current standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in Korea and Western countries is a multimodal approach incorporating preoperative long‐course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy. This approach has significantly improved local control and reduced recurrence rates; however, the overall survival benefit has not been established. Although LCRT is a good option, there remain challenging unresolved problems for colorectal surgeons. We focused on four challenging issues in this review article. The first is LARC with resectable liver metastases, for which there has been no consensus regarding optimal management and practice thus far. The second is cancer progression at the time of restaging after completion of preoperative LCRT. To date, there have been few reports on this issue. The third is early recurrence after TME following preoperative LCRT, the reason for which is thought to be the delayed systemic chemotherapy in the preoperative LCRT protocol. The fourth is cost‐effectiveness. The preoperative LCRT protocol takes 5 weeks. After a 6‐8‐week waiting period, surgery is performed. Therefore, it is more time‐consuming than short‐course chemoradiotherapy. To overcome these issues, total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) modalities, performed using various protocols, have been conducted globally based on cumulative experience. We also attempted to discuss previous TNT protocols in this article. One treatment strategy is not sufficient for patients with varying clinical characteristics. Therefore, we should revisit current treatment strategies based on recent clinical experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7382439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73824392020-07-27 Challenges and shifting treatment strategies in the surgical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer Kim, Ho Seung Kim, Nam Kyu Ann Gastroenterol Surg Review Articles The current standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in Korea and Western countries is a multimodal approach incorporating preoperative long‐course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy. This approach has significantly improved local control and reduced recurrence rates; however, the overall survival benefit has not been established. Although LCRT is a good option, there remain challenging unresolved problems for colorectal surgeons. We focused on four challenging issues in this review article. The first is LARC with resectable liver metastases, for which there has been no consensus regarding optimal management and practice thus far. The second is cancer progression at the time of restaging after completion of preoperative LCRT. To date, there have been few reports on this issue. The third is early recurrence after TME following preoperative LCRT, the reason for which is thought to be the delayed systemic chemotherapy in the preoperative LCRT protocol. The fourth is cost‐effectiveness. The preoperative LCRT protocol takes 5 weeks. After a 6‐8‐week waiting period, surgery is performed. Therefore, it is more time‐consuming than short‐course chemoradiotherapy. To overcome these issues, total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) modalities, performed using various protocols, have been conducted globally based on cumulative experience. We also attempted to discuss previous TNT protocols in this article. One treatment strategy is not sufficient for patients with varying clinical characteristics. Therefore, we should revisit current treatment strategies based on recent clinical experience. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7382439/ /pubmed/32724881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12349 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Kim, Ho Seung
Kim, Nam Kyu
Challenges and shifting treatment strategies in the surgical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer
title Challenges and shifting treatment strategies in the surgical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer
title_full Challenges and shifting treatment strategies in the surgical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer
title_fullStr Challenges and shifting treatment strategies in the surgical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Challenges and shifting treatment strategies in the surgical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer
title_short Challenges and shifting treatment strategies in the surgical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer
title_sort challenges and shifting treatment strategies in the surgical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32724881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12349
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhoseung challengesandshiftingtreatmentstrategiesinthesurgicaltreatmentoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT kimnamkyu challengesandshiftingtreatmentstrategiesinthesurgicaltreatmentoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer