Cargando…
Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Logistic Regression for 30-days Survival Prediction of Cancer Patients
INTRODUCTION: A machine learning technique that imitates neural system and brain can provide better than traditional methods like logistic regression for survival prediction and create an algorithm by determining influential factors. AIM: To determine the influential factors on survival time of pall...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academy of Medical sciences
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32742062 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2020.28.108-113 |
_version_ | 1783563314892111872 |
---|---|
author | Arkin, Funda Secik Aras, Gulfidan Dogu, Elif |
author_facet | Arkin, Funda Secik Aras, Gulfidan Dogu, Elif |
author_sort | Arkin, Funda Secik |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: A machine learning technique that imitates neural system and brain can provide better than traditional methods like logistic regression for survival prediction and create an algorithm by determining influential factors. AIM: To determine the influential factors on survival time of palliative care cancer patients and to compare two statistical methods for better prediction of survival. METHODS: One-year data is gathered from the patients that we followed in the palliative care clinic of our hospital (2017-2018) (n = 189). All data were retrospectively evaluated. After descriptive statistics, we used Pearson and Spearman correlations for parametric and non-parametric variables. The Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and logistic regression model were applied to parameters which have a significant correlation with short survival. RESULTS: Significantly correlated variables with short survival were Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), brain, liver, and distant metastasis, hemogram parameters, cero-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin (ALB). ANN model showed 89.3% prediction accuracy while the logistic regression model showed 73.0%. ANN model achieved a better AUC value of 0.86 than logistic regression model (0.76). DISCUSSION: There are several prognostic evaluation tools such as PPS, KPS, CRP, albumin, leukocytes, neutrophil were reported several studies as survival-related parameters in logistic regression models, also. Many studies compare ANN with logistic regression. When we evaluated these parameters totally, we observed the same relations with survival then we used the same parameters in the ANN model. The effectivity of the survival prediction models can be improved with the use of ANN. CONCLUSION: ANN provides a more accurate estimation than logistic regression. ANN model is an important statistical method for survival prediction of cancer patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7382770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Academy of Medical sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73827702020-07-31 Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Logistic Regression for 30-days Survival Prediction of Cancer Patients Arkin, Funda Secik Aras, Gulfidan Dogu, Elif Acta Inform Med Original Paper INTRODUCTION: A machine learning technique that imitates neural system and brain can provide better than traditional methods like logistic regression for survival prediction and create an algorithm by determining influential factors. AIM: To determine the influential factors on survival time of palliative care cancer patients and to compare two statistical methods for better prediction of survival. METHODS: One-year data is gathered from the patients that we followed in the palliative care clinic of our hospital (2017-2018) (n = 189). All data were retrospectively evaluated. After descriptive statistics, we used Pearson and Spearman correlations for parametric and non-parametric variables. The Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and logistic regression model were applied to parameters which have a significant correlation with short survival. RESULTS: Significantly correlated variables with short survival were Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), brain, liver, and distant metastasis, hemogram parameters, cero-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin (ALB). ANN model showed 89.3% prediction accuracy while the logistic regression model showed 73.0%. ANN model achieved a better AUC value of 0.86 than logistic regression model (0.76). DISCUSSION: There are several prognostic evaluation tools such as PPS, KPS, CRP, albumin, leukocytes, neutrophil were reported several studies as survival-related parameters in logistic regression models, also. Many studies compare ANN with logistic regression. When we evaluated these parameters totally, we observed the same relations with survival then we used the same parameters in the ANN model. The effectivity of the survival prediction models can be improved with the use of ANN. CONCLUSION: ANN provides a more accurate estimation than logistic regression. ANN model is an important statistical method for survival prediction of cancer patients. Academy of Medical sciences 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7382770/ /pubmed/32742062 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2020.28.108-113 Text en © 2020 Funda Secik Arkin, Gulfidan Aras, Elif Dogu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Arkin, Funda Secik Aras, Gulfidan Dogu, Elif Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Logistic Regression for 30-days Survival Prediction of Cancer Patients |
title | Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Logistic Regression for 30-days Survival Prediction of Cancer Patients |
title_full | Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Logistic Regression for 30-days Survival Prediction of Cancer Patients |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Logistic Regression for 30-days Survival Prediction of Cancer Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Logistic Regression for 30-days Survival Prediction of Cancer Patients |
title_short | Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Logistic Regression for 30-days Survival Prediction of Cancer Patients |
title_sort | comparison of artificial neural networks and logistic regression for 30-days survival prediction of cancer patients |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32742062 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2020.28.108-113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arkinfundasecik comparisonofartificialneuralnetworksandlogisticregressionfor30dayssurvivalpredictionofcancerpatients AT arasgulfidan comparisonofartificialneuralnetworksandlogisticregressionfor30dayssurvivalpredictionofcancerpatients AT doguelif comparisonofartificialneuralnetworksandlogisticregressionfor30dayssurvivalpredictionofcancerpatients |